Started By
Message
locked post

7 Quick Takeaways from America's New Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico

Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:10 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:10 pm
Simply posting this because none of you will. Don't shoot the messenger. Send the author an email if you want.

quote:


The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA): 7 Questions Answered
Consumers are the biggest losers in the new trade agreement.
Monday, October 01, 2018


Joe Carter

Economics Trade Agreement NAFTA Protectionism

What just happened?

Shortly before midnight on September 30, the United States and Canada agreed to a deal to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The new trilateral trade agreement is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

When does it take effect?

Before it can take effect, leaders from each of the three countries must sign it and get it approved by their nations' legislatures. Because this process is expected to take several months, the main provisions of USMCA won’t take effect until 2020.

Is this a free trade agreement?

No. Unlike NAFTA, this latest agreement makes no pretense to be about free trade (or even freer trade). It’s a protectionist agreement imposed by the U.S. on the other two countries.

Who benefits from the agreement?

The primary beneficiaries of the agreement are labor unions, U.S. dairy farmers, U.S. drug manufacturers, and companies that provide automation for manufacturers (e.g., robot makers).

The agreement will require at least 30 percent of cars (rising to 40 percent by 2023) to be made by workers earning $16 an hour. This will force more cars to be produced in the U.S. and Canada since the typical manufacturing wage in Mexico is only about $5 per hour. The agreement also requires Mexico to make it easier for workers to form unions, which will make them less competitive against more productive unionized workers in the U.S. and Canada.

U.S. dairy farmers will also gain greater access to the Canadian market. Because of new restrictions on how much dairy Canada can export, there is the potential for U.S. dairy to gain a greater market share in foreign countries.

U.S. drug companies will also be able to sell pharmaceuticals in Canada for 10 years (rather than eight) before facing generic competition.

Because the agreement makes human labor in the three countries somewhat more costly, companies that create robots and other automation will likely be the long-term beneficiaries.

Who are the biggest losers in this agreement?

As with almost all protectionist trade agreements, consumers are the ones who will be hurt the most.

As the Washington Post notes, economists and auto experts think USMCA is going to cause car prices in the U.S. to “rise and the selection to go down, especially on small cars that used to be produced in Mexico but may not be able to be brought across the border duty-free anymore.”

Because the restrictions on Canadian steel and aluminum also remain in place, businesses that use those materials in manufacturing will pay inflated prices, and their products will be less competitive on the global market.




LINK
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 9:17 pm
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
19115 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:13 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:52 pm
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:13 pm to
This time you have convinced me! LOL loser
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24147 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

No. Unlike NAFTA, this latest agreement makes no pretense to be about free trade (or even freer trade). It’s a protectionist agreement imposed by the U.S. on the other two countries.


Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12441 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:15 pm to
Thanks Free Trade Jesus.
Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
7929 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:15 pm to
I'm reading this spin, but even spun, it still sounds pretty good for the US, so it must be really fkn good for the US in actuality.

Cool
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:17 pm to
Well the messenger is right in that tariffs

1) are harmful to the economy
2) are bad for consumers because they result in higher prices
3) create more corruption in government as bureaucrats pick winners and losers


AND the messenger is right when he says there is no evidence in any numbers of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to support the claim that our trade deficits have resulted in fewer jobs in the US economy.

No intelligent person can deny those points.
This post was edited on 10/2/18 at 9:19 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78236 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:18 pm to
Despite using the boogeymen of pharmaceutical companies and even my hated unions, I'm trying to find the problem.
Posted by blowmeauburn
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
8050 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:19 pm to
Lol so the Christian thing to do is to support the indentured servitude of mexicans? We are helping them get higher wages in the short term.

Posted by cusoonkpd
Big Mamou
Member since Apr 2015
1828 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:19 pm to
Are all liberals insane?
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26330 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:20 pm to
Isn't there a provision in this deal and the deal with Europe to limit or restrict imports from China in some way?

If my memory serves me right, these deals will really help hinder China's ability to resist Trumps terms on our trade deal with them.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46245 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

As with almost all protectionist trade agreements, consumers are the ones who will be hurt the most.

As the Washington Post notes,


Stopped reading right there.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
14300 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:20 pm to
Trump.

Promises made. Promises kept.

How uniquely refreshing!

EU, Mexico, Canada, and China next!
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:20 pm to
Paul Krugman sees no problems with higher taxes on consumers either. You and him appear in agreement.
Posted by PickupAutist
Member since Sep 2018
3038 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:21 pm to
Only IB Freeman could try to spin a trade deal with Canada where the US made absolutely zero concessions and got all the benefit as the bad thing.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100689 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:21 pm to
They fail to mention how it benefits Mexican workers who will make more money, reducing the need for them to immigrate here. Less immigration means a tighter job market, which means rising wages. This helps offset the rise in costs of goods.

The tariffs on steel and aluminum is to keep China from using the loophole by dumping substandard steel in Canada and having it shipped here from Canada
Posted by TigerMikeAtl
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
1974 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:21 pm to
Did you come out of the womb this way or did you experience a horrible accident early in life?
Posted by Johnpettigrew
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2017
1744 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:21 pm to
You are just pissed they have not come to an agreement with the Chinese yet. Mardi Gras around the corner and it’s time for you to get that bead business in high gear.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78236 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:22 pm to
That's what I was thinking. This makes US labor more competitive, while US dairy farmers gain market share in Canada and US pharmaceutical companies get an additional two years of revenue from their brand name products. What's the problem besides "Trump?"
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23405 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:22 pm to
So is the article stating that regulations the US put on US industry are bad since they are trying to say those same regulations should not be done in Canada and Mexico?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram