- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oh shite, somebody is leaking WAPO emails to WSJ regarding Ford story. Wapo in on smear?
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:26 pm
quote:
Kimberley Strassel
?Verified account @KimStrassel
1) More big breaking news, which further undercuts the Ford accusation, as well as media handling of it. A source has given me the email that WaPo reporter Emma Brown sent to Mark Judge, one person Ford claims was at the party. This email is dated Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018
2) The email wants a comment from him. The subsequent story would reveal Christine Ford's name, and give details of the supposed "assault."
3) One part of the email to Judge reads: "In addition to Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, whom she called acquaintances she knew from past socializing, she recalls that her friend Leland (last name then was Ingham, now Keyser) was at the house and a friend of the boys named PJ."
4) This matters for two big reasons--Ford's credibility and WaPo's. The subsequent WaPo story would go on to cite Ford's name and details, and also list notes from a therapist that Ford told this to in 2012. Read carefully what WaPo reports, the same day it emails Judge:
5) "The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.”
6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was "four boys,"even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was "four boys,"even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.
7) So first, huge problem: This was just a week ago, and we have Ford giving two different accounts of who was present. Four boys. No, three boys, one girl. Either way, therapist notes from 2012 definitively say four boys, which Ford didn't dispute. But now... a girl!
8) Other problem: WaPo's reporting. Reporter has for a week had the names of those Ford listed as present. One is a woman. Yet it writes a story saying FOUR BOYS. Why? Maybe a mistake. But if so, why did WaPo never correct that narrative?
9) What, you can't find Keyser? She has lived in the DC area a long time. The paper had no trouble tracking down the other two men (btw, who also denied such party). And why not publish Keyser's name? It published the other men's names.
10) In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: "Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware."
11) Wow. "Before her name became public, Ford told..." That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford's response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.
LEAKED EMAIL: WAPO KNEW LAST SUNDAY ABOUT FORD FEMALE FRIEND, DID NOT REPORT IT
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Everyone is getting caught in lies now. Wrap this shite up and toss it out.
Posted on 9/22/18 at 11:46 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What Kavanaugh did as an adolescent teen is irrelevant , slash thread and frick liberal democrats!
Posted on 9/23/18 at 6:19 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is what Grassley had.
He may have had it before Monday.
He may have had it before Monday.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 6:25 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Now the Republicans are leaking this after Christine Blasobitch-Ford has agreed in principle to testify.
Now that she’s agreed, they leak the girl involved and her denial. Christine Blasobitch-Ford now risks looking like a liar all along and backing out. Or going through with this and being a liar.
I wondered where PJ’s name came from. The Pubbies had it all along.
Now, let it be clearly shown that the WaPo had all these details all along. Internal inconsistencies to her story and early denials from her “witnesses.” They chose to participate in fabricating this story.
Washington Post is fake news. All you liberals crying about the “fake news” appellation. It works because it fits.
Now that she’s agreed, they leak the girl involved and her denial. Christine Blasobitch-Ford now risks looking like a liar all along and backing out. Or going through with this and being a liar.
I wondered where PJ’s name came from. The Pubbies had it all along.
Now, let it be clearly shown that the WaPo had all these details all along. Internal inconsistencies to her story and early denials from her “witnesses.” They chose to participate in fabricating this story.
Washington Post is fake news. All you liberals crying about the “fake news” appellation. It works because it fits.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 6:30 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
she recalls that her friend Leland (last name then was
Is this Leland a boy or girl? I think I read it was a girl. Weird name for a girl. Maybe the source of confusion.
Regardless, this Ford bitch must go down in a big way for her bullshite.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 6:58 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:It also establishes that the Washington Post knew from the outset the supposed house where this occurred belonged to none of the alleged attendees.
Wow. "Before her name became public, Ford told..." That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford's response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 7:00 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This might be the dems throwing Ford under the bus, seeing as the public is not sympathetic to her at the moment.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:22 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Man shite man I got mans. shite man they all get me band lnshdf ansndjhhgf the d themdamn denrart just desperate ndhrg man shift man dhf
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:23 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It’s very coincidental that WaPo was also in on a smear that took place in an Alabama election.
I always believed it was suspect that Roy’s women didn’t go to an Alabama newspaper.
I always believed it was suspect that Roy’s women didn’t go to an Alabama newspaper.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 11:15 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
The big take always are:
Why didn’t the so called WaPo journalist actually do the leg work and track down Keyser?
Nothing remarkable happened yet now Ford is claiming the event was so egregious that we should not seat a man that has people lining up to support him? Not sure about you guys but if this event had been so traumatic to Ford wouldn’t it be immediately obvious to all parties involved?
I am a pretty cut and dry guy. When something smells like shite I say it smells like shite. Couple all this with the fact that Keyser now has publicly claimed she does not know Judge Kavanaugh, this not only smell like, but looks like a hug pile of steaming shite!
quote:
What, you can't find Keyser? She has lived in the DC area a long time. The paper had no trouble tracking down the other two men (btw, who also denied such party). And why not publish Keyser's name? It published the other men's names.
Why didn’t the so called WaPo journalist actually do the leg work and track down Keyser?
quote:
In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: "Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware."
Nothing remarkable happened yet now Ford is claiming the event was so egregious that we should not seat a man that has people lining up to support him? Not sure about you guys but if this event had been so traumatic to Ford wouldn’t it be immediately obvious to all parties involved?
quote:
Wow. "Before her name became public, Ford told..." That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford's response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.
I am a pretty cut and dry guy. When something smells like shite I say it smells like shite. Couple all this with the fact that Keyser now has publicly claimed she does not know Judge Kavanaugh, this not only smell like, but looks like a hug pile of steaming shite!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News