- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I'm new to the QAnon Stuff
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:04 pm
So, as the title of the thread states, I'm new to this QAnon fella and have done a good bit of research. Obviously it quite often leads down a rabbit hole of craziness that I just don't have time to follow.
My question is simple, yet complicated all at the same time. How credible is the information Q puts out? Have there been "predictions" that have been accurate? I get there a ton of "coincidences", but just how deep does this thing go and what kind of credibility is there?
My question is simple, yet complicated all at the same time. How credible is the information Q puts out? Have there been "predictions" that have been accurate? I get there a ton of "coincidences", but just how deep does this thing go and what kind of credibility is there?
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:07 pm to ibleedprplngld
No one can give you a satisfactory answer. Unfortunately, much of the Q stuff requires a lot of long-term patience and attentiveness to verify. I, at least, have no idea whether it's a LARP, a psy-op, or /ourguy/.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:09 pm to ibleedprplngld
You couldn't read the four or so threads on this subject that have been started this week?
Let me sum it up for you. People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep). If that describes you, then dive right in.
Let me sum it up for you. People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep). If that describes you, then dive right in.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:12 pm to AUbused
quote:
People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep).
Republicans do it, too.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:13 pm to AUbused
quote:
People who are into Q also swear up and down that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep). If that describes you, then dive right in
This is not accurate at all. Not surprised you would get this wrong too.
Yes, some Q-followers are into fringe social-theories and more sinister ideas of the us vs. them.
But for the most part, most of us following Q are cautiously optimistic. Yes, he states a lot of crap that isn't close to being accurate.
Yes, he states some Captain Obvious stuff.
Yes, he has hit the nail on the head well before it could be labeled simply as a "lucky guess".
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:13 pm to HempHead
The point of Q is to hold those who we elect accountable.
Many republicans have "left office" too. And its all for the same corrupt bullshite. The dumbass Dem's are just to stupid to abandon ship.
They should all be hung
Many republicans have "left office" too. And its all for the same corrupt bullshite. The dumbass Dem's are just to stupid to abandon ship.
They should all be hung
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:14 pm to HempHead
quote:
Republicans do it, too.
Swear up and down or rape children in pizza restaurants?
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:14 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Swear up and down or rape children in pizza restaurants?
Rape up and down in swear restaurants.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:24 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:"Pizza" is a code word for underage children used for sex. It doesn't have to be in an actual pizza restaurant.
Swear up and down or rape children in pizza restaurants?
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:26 pm to ibleedprplngld
I was willing to listen to the talk of Q being sorta legit previously, but not after this week.
When Q pimped the kid in the Q shirt as something preplanned he gave himself away as a fraud.
If you watch the video Trump is clearly pointing at the woman in the red shirt.
Q got cocky and tried to play that too much.
Anybody that still listens to Q after that should be laughed at ruthlessly.
When Q pimped the kid in the Q shirt as something preplanned he gave himself away as a fraud.
If you watch the video Trump is clearly pointing at the woman in the red shirt.
Q got cocky and tried to play that too much.
Anybody that still listens to Q after that should be laughed at ruthlessly.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:27 pm to AUbused
quote:
that democrats rape children in non-existent pizza basements(see Bamarep).
That's not the story...that's the story MSM told you...
The real story is the coded language and symbols used by the industry (cabal, whatever you want to call it). The FBI had a code book out on it that was leaked in wikileaks.
Pizza is code for boy-lover...
That is the origin of pizzagate...then some Anons identified several restaurants that used the coded symbols and pointed it out...
So the MSM quickly diverted attention to those restaurants (which granted have WIERD shite GOING ON)...
Then an actor went into James Alefantes ' pizza place and put a couple holes in the walls.
The pedo language is real, and coded messages were found in JOHN PODESTA's emails that reflected this, and may be attributed to it.
Dems are not the only ones suspected... Dennis Hastert was an R and convicted of Pedo...it is a DC power and control thing, up and comers in government and finance are groomed and elevated.
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:33 pm to IceTiger
quote:
The real story is the coded language and symbols used by the industry (cabal, whatever you want to call it). The FBI had a code book out on it that was leaked in wikileaks. Pizza is code for boy-lover...
That is the origin of pizzagate...then some Anons identified several restaurants that used the coded symbols and pointed it out... So the MSM quickly diverted attention to those restaurants (which granted have WIERD shite GOING ON)... Then an actor went into James Alefantes ' pizza place and put a couple holes in the walls.
The pedo language is real, and coded messages were found in JOHN PODESTA's emails that reflected this, and may be attributed to it.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand there it is OP. Do I really need to say anything else folks?
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:35 pm to Salmon
quote:
Anybody that still listens to Q after that should be laughed at ruthlessly.
Womp womp.
Seriously, you're no fun.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:51 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
QAnon fella
bamarep posted a picture of "him"(?) at a Trump rally...he's not really a "fella". It looked more like a sexually ambiguous fatty: LINK
quote:
How credible is the information Q puts out?
As credible as:
This post was edited on 6/22/18 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:51 pm to ibleedprplngld
I only check the 2000+ pg Q thread once in a while, and don't otherwise follow Q at all. So, take what I say with a grain of salt.
First, I'll assume that those saying Q has predicted things ahead of time in a way would've been difficult without insider knowledge are correct. I can't back that up, but have gotten that impression from some of the posters in the Q thread. I'll accept that at face value.
It's also worth noting that some of the same posters that give credence to Q have stated that there is some wrong info in Q's posts... their take seems to be that this is intentional disinformation that makes it harder for deep state or enemy operatives to track Q down. Is this true? Who knows. But it directly suggests Q is sometimes wrong-- intentional or not. In fairness, no matter how good intel might be, developing situations tend to be fluid and subject to change depending on changing variables. So it's possible Q makes predictions based on good intel, but then a variable or two changes making the outcome not consistent with the prediction.
Bottom line: Based on casually following Q on the poliboard here only, the info (predictions) Q has provided has a less than 50% chance of coming to fruition or--in fairness-- has yet to come to fruition. This may be intentional or not, but it means any particular piece of info should be taken with a grain of salt.
On the face of it, this might sound negative. But I don't mean it that way. Q goes out on a limb... sort of like a home run hitter who hits it out the park a lot, but also strikes out a lot.
imho, the purpose of Q is to shed a little light on obscure events & players that have influence on world events. I don't think there's any harm at all in following him/her unless doing so would make you act irrationally in your day to day life. Assuming you're stable, Q can be at least entertaining, if not genuinely informative.
First, I'll assume that those saying Q has predicted things ahead of time in a way would've been difficult without insider knowledge are correct. I can't back that up, but have gotten that impression from some of the posters in the Q thread. I'll accept that at face value.
It's also worth noting that some of the same posters that give credence to Q have stated that there is some wrong info in Q's posts... their take seems to be that this is intentional disinformation that makes it harder for deep state or enemy operatives to track Q down. Is this true? Who knows. But it directly suggests Q is sometimes wrong-- intentional or not. In fairness, no matter how good intel might be, developing situations tend to be fluid and subject to change depending on changing variables. So it's possible Q makes predictions based on good intel, but then a variable or two changes making the outcome not consistent with the prediction.
Bottom line: Based on casually following Q on the poliboard here only, the info (predictions) Q has provided has a less than 50% chance of coming to fruition or--in fairness-- has yet to come to fruition. This may be intentional or not, but it means any particular piece of info should be taken with a grain of salt.
On the face of it, this might sound negative. But I don't mean it that way. Q goes out on a limb... sort of like a home run hitter who hits it out the park a lot, but also strikes out a lot.
imho, the purpose of Q is to shed a little light on obscure events & players that have influence on world events. I don't think there's any harm at all in following him/her unless doing so would make you act irrationally in your day to day life. Assuming you're stable, Q can be at least entertaining, if not genuinely informative.
Posted on 6/22/18 at 2:54 pm to Salmon
quote:
If you watch the video Trump is clearly pointing at the woman in the red shirt.
Q got cocky and tried to play that too much.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News