CNN gonna CNN: Semantic deflection

quote:

---

Then, the semantic gymnastics of the Twitterati rationalize it like only they can do. (This type of stuff is what the media and the left do on a regular basis like some big circle jerk.)

---

If the intent was deception why would they also write that the ruling was 7-2?

They were all doing it. I'm just amazed at how many people willingly rub shite in their eyes so that they can't see the constant conflation and wordplay to score a win.

It was a "narrow" holding.

Woods is usually on point with his Tweets, but this wasn't one of them. The scope is what was narrow, not the vote.

I hate the MSM and CNN as much as the next guy, and i agree that their headline suggested the vote was close to the headline-only browsing American public, but reviewing other unrelated articles online....



“Why A Narrow Ruling For New Jersey Could Still Allow Sports Betting By Private Operators“ Forbes APR 23, 2018 @ 01:08 PM
——————————————
In the Wake of Stern: Supreme Court Issues Narrow Ruling in Executive Benefits and Grants Certiorari in Wellness International

American Bar Association Young Lawyer Division Bankruptcy Committee Newsletter
By Dana S. Katz

Originally published in the American Bar Association Young Lawyer Division Bankruptcy Committee Fall 2014 Newsletter, Vol. 1 No. 1. (c) 2014 by the American Bar Association.

In a narrow and unanimous decision entered on June 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States provided guidance to Bankruptcy Courts confronted with “Stern claims” – those “designated for final adjudication in the bankruptcy court as a statutory matter, but prohibited from proceeding in that way as a constitutional matter.”Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, 134 S.Ct. 2165, 2170, 573 U.S. __ (2014).