Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Self-Defense Ammo Expansion & Penetration Tests

Posted on 3/30/18 at 1:37 pm
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 1:37 pm
Ammo To Go has published the results of a pretty large batch of terminal ballistics testing, done with a pretty wide range of SD ammo.

The test involved 4 layers of clothing placed in front of blocks of 10% ballistics gel.

The interesting thing is that they used handguns with relatively short barrels -- 9mm Shield, Ruger LCP, M&P 40c and Ruger SR45. With the exception of the SR45 (4.5" barrel), all of the others had barrel lengths of 3.5" or shorter.

These tests don't perfectly replicate the FBI's test protocol (shorter barrels and different mix of clothing) but it looks to be an interesting, valid comparison.

Results of Terminal Ballistics Tests
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 1:49 pm to
This is a lot of data, very cool. thanks
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 2:40 pm to
Well there goes my afternoon.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27487 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:19 pm to
Before clicking, best performers are:

180 grain 10mm
185 grain .45
115 grain 9mm

In that order. The 240s, 220s, and 147s are meh.
Posted by Djhossfly
Member since Jan 2016
88 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:23 pm to
He said 147's are meh
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:30 pm to
Actually the 147 gr HST rounds did pretty well. They didn't test a lot of 115 gr but they tended to either not penetrate enough or not expand and then over-penetrate. However the Black Hills 115 gr +P did really well.

Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27487 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:38 pm to
115 grain rounds that consistently expand blow up and penetrate A LOT.

If the light is right, you can see 147s in flight
Posted by Timmayy
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:41 pm to
How is this much diffferent that’s the tests completed by lucky gunner?

Which test is better?

Sorry I’m truck so I can’t study like I want to but I am fascinated by bullet ballistics I’m oistols and I love the lucky gunner test
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27487 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:45 pm to
Holy shite, those Ranger talon 230s are insane!

Almost 1inch in diameter
Posted by Timmayy
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 4:55 pm to
Honestly after looking at it the lucky gunner one is much better. If not for its filtering options buts pictures that go along woh it. M
Unless this one has all that and it’s just not available to me on a mobile version
Posted by uptowntiger84
uptown
Member since Jul 2011
3929 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 5:08 pm to
I've had the Barnes tac-x for years in my glock 30.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Holy shite, those Ranger talon 230s are insane!

Yeah that was impressive.
Posted by Cajun367
S. Louisiana
Member since Oct 2017
1930 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 9:44 pm to
Used to get into stuff like this.

But the truth is, a person may survive multiple 9mm wounds, while the next is DRT (dead right there) from a single 22. The amount of variables is endless.

Pick a sealed primer hollow point of your choosing and practice, practice, practice.
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
11486 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 9:57 pm to
Like in dumb and dumber movie “what if he shot you in the face?”

Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 10:59 pm to
I just hate how they never include a 125gr sjhp full power 357 magnum in these tests for reference.

Im still not convinced a bonded bullet is the answer. A cup n core hollow point hauling arse was the answer for a long time.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16636 posts
Posted on 3/30/18 at 11:18 pm to
I've always thought heavy-for-caliber was the better overall choice for SD ammo. There are so many variables and "stopping power" being the myth that it is, I feel better sending more mass than less.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 3/31/18 at 12:07 am to
That’s all super tacti-cool

99.9% of gun owners know if you hit an intruder with hot lead it’s effective.
This post was edited on 3/31/18 at 9:53 am
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6818 posts
Posted on 3/31/18 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

I just hate how they never include a 125gr sjhp full power 357 magnum in these tests for reference.


Excellent point. Although the 357 Magnum 125 gr JHP was the gold standard self defense round for many years, many never even consider when talking about rounds for self defense.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 3/31/18 at 9:08 pm to
Its damn near impossible to find any comparable tests from a reputable source. I dont understand why.

I was clicking around while shopping for my most recent purchase and was reading about 357 sig vs mag. An ex cop said he shot a perp in the chest with a full size 357 mag with old school 125gr sjhp. He said there were pieces of copper and bad guy and shite several feet behind where the guy was standing. Bad guy was DRT. Most of the bullet didnt exit but it went all over the place. Piss poor performance by most modern standards but the results say otherwise.

What im getting at is im still skeptical that 100% weight retention is the answer. Id like to see some old school stuff vetted out to the extent that the new stuff is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram