- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump orders DOJ to ban bump stocks
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to BobBoucher
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to BobBoucher
Who gives a frick about bump stocks except the most diehard?
And why would anyone think Trump cares? He’s a New Yorker who doesn’t really care about this shite. He knows he has to toe the line on the 2nd but he will flex on stuff around the edges if it makes this issue go away. Only the dumbest most extreme motherfrickers care about some of this shite like bump stocks and Trump isn’t going to alienate the middle ground over it.
And why would anyone think Trump cares? He’s a New Yorker who doesn’t really care about this shite. He knows he has to toe the line on the 2nd but he will flex on stuff around the edges if it makes this issue go away. Only the dumbest most extreme motherfrickers care about some of this shite like bump stocks and Trump isn’t going to alienate the middle ground over it.
1
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Yeah, that's why I said to wait. A week or two should be enough for the fake concern to settle.
Serious question. Do you think that bump stocks should be legal for 2nd amendment reason or because it's so easy to do it using belt loops etc. that banning them doesn't do anything? Or is it the slippery slope issue?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to AUsteriskPride
Slide Fire stock for sale - $10,000
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to bamarep
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:10 pm to Iosh
quote:
Well then this seems pretty silly.
It is. Anyone who passed art in 1st grade can accomplish the same thing that a bump-fire stock does. Hell, you can make your own with a 3D printer.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:10 pm to Pesticide
quote:
Meh. I don't have an issue with it. No accuracy when firing full auto anyway.
Yep, and people think the issue is how quickly you can fire/how many rounds you can hold. Ban all you want, people will just get more creative. It's a fricking mental health issue, not the gun.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:13 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
He knows he has to toe the line on the 2nd but he will flex on stuff around the edges if it makes this issue go away. Only the dumbest most extreme motherfrickers care about some of this shite like bump stocks and Trump isn’t going to alienate the middle ground over it.
Yep - that's how politics works.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:17 pm to bamarep
Is this considered infringing on the 2nd Amendment?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:18 pm to AmericaOverParties
quote:I doubt SCOTUS would take the case. Heller and MacDonald stood for the basic right to own guns, but they explicitly declined to extend the rulings beyond that and so I don't see a right to every conceivable gun accessory.
Is this considered infringing on the 2nd Amendment?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:19 pm to bamarep
Guys I'm not trying to troll here but u do realize that eventually, down the road, this will happen again. Assault Weapons Ban The country is moving too far to the left for it not to.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:22 pm to AmericaOverParties
You think? I beg to differ.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:23 pm to BarberitosDawg
Do you stand on the prow and quote Quint?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:25 pm to bamarep
Are they going to ban belt loops on your pants too?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:32 pm to AmericaOverParties
quote:
this will happen again. Assault Weapons Ban
If it didn't happen under Obama with a supermajority in Congress, it's not going to happen.
The ban was not renewed because everyone saw it did absolutely nothing.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:32 pm to Haughton99
quote:
Do you think that bump stocks should be legal for 2nd amendment reason or because it's so easy to do it using belt loops etc. that banning them doesn't do anything?
I honestly don't personally care if they're legal or not. I already have an automatic weapon, and as we covered yesterday, I don't have much use for them anymore. My thought on it is that the NFA and GCA68 both need repealed. Bump-fire stocks become irrelevant at that point.
That said, I do think it's a pointless gesture. It's easy to modify a weapon to do exactly what a bump stock does, and you can make your own if you are that eager to own one.
quote:
Or is it the slippery slope issue?
Yes, this is probably true as well. Are you good with bump stocks and that's it? Or are you thinking about the next thing that can be banned?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:33 pm to bamarep
Mags
It’s a start
It’s a start
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:34 pm to asurob1
quote:
Mags
It’s a start
Yet another pointless idea.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:35 pm to Centinel
You believe those kids in Florida are the "Minority" of kids in this country? Those kids are coming up and I'll bet that assault weapon ban will be reinstated in the next 20 yrs. How much we betting?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:39 pm to AmericaOverParties
Do you have the same political views that you had when you were 14, or have you matured a bit as you've gained education and experience?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:45 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
Its a stupid "feel good" move.
I disagree. This is actually a common sense solution that can minimize casualties when crazies decide to shoot up a place.
Teenagers cutting class and marching is a stupid feel good move that accomplishes absolutely nothing.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News