- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best Arguments & Methods To Defend Ownership or Possession of High Capacity Mags
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:15 am
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:15 am
It seems the left definition of high capacity mags ranges from 5 to 10 round carrying capacity.
If that is the case, what are the best, most honest, and least emotional, defenses of the right to continue to purchase, sale or own mags of a greater capacity than 5 or 10?
What would the legal arguments be to defeat hypothetical legislation that limits mag capacity?
If that is the case, what are the best, most honest, and least emotional, defenses of the right to continue to purchase, sale or own mags of a greater capacity than 5 or 10?
What would the legal arguments be to defeat hypothetical legislation that limits mag capacity?
23
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:17 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
What would the legal arguments be to defeat hypothetical legislation that limits mag capacity?
"shall not be infringed."
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 10:17 am
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:18 am to DeltaDoc
The 2nd amendment was written within the context of the typical citizen being able to own and carry arms in defense of their life and liberty, specifically against the possibility of a tyrannical government that would seek to remove one or both from the citizenry. "High capacity magazines" allow an every day citizen a chance to fight back against tyranny if the need ever arises.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:18 am to DeltaDoc
That would outlaw many semi automatic pistols as well
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:20 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
Best Arguments & Methods To Defend Ownership or Possession of High Capacity Mags
Lots of hogs need killin'... Oh and the constitution.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:20 am to DeltaDoc
US, deadliest modern mass shootings
1 2017 Vegas, 58 killed
2 2016 Pulse 49
3 2007 VA Tech 32
4 2012 Sandy Hook 26
4 2017 Sutherland Springs 26
6 1991 Killeen 23
7 1984 San Ysidro 21
8 2018 Stoneman 17
9 1966 UT Austin 16
10 2015 San Bernardino 14
3 occurred in the past 5 mos
I think the best defense is to show how effective possession of high capacity mags have been. I mean look at this list!
1 2017 Vegas, 58 killed
2 2016 Pulse 49
3 2007 VA Tech 32
4 2012 Sandy Hook 26
4 2017 Sutherland Springs 26
6 1991 Killeen 23
7 1984 San Ysidro 21
8 2018 Stoneman 17
9 1966 UT Austin 16
10 2015 San Bernardino 14
3 occurred in the past 5 mos
I think the best defense is to show how effective possession of high capacity mags have been. I mean look at this list!
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am to FooManChoo
quote:ICYMI
The 2nd amendment was written within the context of the typical citizen being able to own and carry arms in defense of their life and liberty, specifically against the possibility of a tyrannical government that would seek to remove one or both from the citizenry. "High capacity magazines" allow an every day citizen a chance to fight back against tyranny if the need ever arises.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:21 am to Jyrdis
Competition shooting...
Wild Hog extermination...
Personal Defense...
Home Defense...
Hunting in general, especially when talking about 5...
"Shall not be infringed"...
Because I fricking want to, I am not a criminal, and the 2A says I can...
Wild Hog extermination...
Personal Defense...
Home Defense...
Hunting in general, especially when talking about 5...
"Shall not be infringed"...
Because I fricking want to, I am not a criminal, and the 2A says I can...
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:22 am to DeltaDoc
What good would it do? We’re protected in our right to keep and bear arms. The burden of providing a compelling argument is on you. Not me.
What are your best, honest, least emotional arguments for limiting mag size?
What are your best, honest, least emotional arguments for limiting mag size?
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:25 am to austintigerdad
quote:Great low-information graphic.
austintigerdad
We've already seen evidence in the last 100 years of what totalitarian governments have done to their unarmed people when they want to control every aspect of their lives (even its existence). Millions dead and liberty lost.
Also, you know why no tyrants have been overthrown in the U.S.? Because none have come to power precisely because of our constitution and the ability of our people to keep and bear arms.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:27 am to DeltaDoc
What size magazines do your SWAT buddies use?
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:27 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
If that is the case, what are the best, most honest, and least emotional, defenses of the right to continue to purchase, sale or own mags of a greater capacity than 5 or 10?
The Constitution says to frick off....end of argument.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:28 am to asurob1
quote:
US, deadliest modern mass shootings
1 2017 Vegas, 58 killed
2 2016 Pulse 49
3 2007 VA Tech 32
4 2012 Sandy Hook 26
4 2017 Sutherland Springs 26
6 1991 Killeen 23
7 1984 San Ysidro 21
8 2018 Stoneman 17
9 1966 UT Austin 16
10 2015 San Bernardino 14
3 occurred in the past 5 mos
Cigarettes will kill close to 500,000 Americans annually. Should we ban cigarettes? Maybe we should only allow a pack to contain 2 cigarettes at a time.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:28 am to DeltaDoc
Thats an easy one, use their own mantra.
“The Russians are coming”
“The Russians are coming”
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:28 am to DeltaDoc
The only emotional argument is the argument to restrict.
The best, most honest argument for is simple personal liberty.
The best, most honest argument for is simple personal liberty.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:30 am to UpToPar
quote:
"shall not be infringed."
couldn't one argue that banning fully automatic and bazookas is a type of infringement that is allowed. Serious question. Not trolling.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:31 am to HoopyD
quote:
couldn't one argue that banning fully automatic and bazookas is a type of infringement that is allowed. Serious question. Not trolling.
It absolutely is infringement
Posted on 2/15/18 at 10:32 am to HoopyD
quote:
fully automatic and bazookas
quote:
Serious question. Not trolling.
anytime someone brings up bazookas I assume you are trolling.
I draw the line at explosives.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News