- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules low-income renters can access more affluent neighborhoods
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:01 am to saintkenn
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:01 am to saintkenn
quote:
how about we take a few rich libs and sprinkle them and their families in to section 8 areas and schools. see if it has the same effect in reverse.
It’s actually more effective. Gentrification. We should be paying decent people to move to bad neighborhoods.
2
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:01 am to starsandstripes
quote:
In CA they are going to cut down trees between a golf course and a housing area because the trees were put there to keep housing values down in a racist move, since the housing area was black. So, trees lower value so situation must be eradicated.
Uh.. what? What do the hippie tree hugging version of Californians think of this?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:02 am to SSpaniel
They're OK with it because of racism.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:03 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
It’s actually more effective. Gentrification. We should be paying decent people to move to bad neighborhoods.
Yes, but it only works if the bad people in the bad neighborhoods are forced out.
Hence bad neighborhoods being bad because of bad people.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:08 am to Havoc
It bears repeating.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:13 am to TheMidasTouch
quote:
making it easier for poor people to afford apartments in middle-class neighborhoods
So much for equality. Where's the move to get the ghetto into UPPER FRICKIN' class neighborhoods?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:17 am to TheMidasTouch
quote:
better schools
OK, sure.
quote:
lower crime rates
Yup.
quote:
more job opportunities.
Ah, horseshite. Many crap areas are close enough to economic centers so as to allow residents walking distance or public transit.
Chattanooga has a HUD tower smack in the middle of business district, but instead of working service industry gigs, the residents just lay about on the plaza all day long. The true value of the property isn't realized because instead of condos or lofts, we have Sec 8.
People in bedroom communities have to drive through blight all the damn time in order to get to work.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:22 am to TheMidasTouch
so all the existing section 8 neighborhoods were already crime filled run down nesses before the people who o cupy then showed uo, right? had nothing to do with the quality of character. if we just give them more free shite maybe theyll like us!?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:23 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
It’s actually more effective. Gentrification.
Not when the poors can't afford the new higher property taxes.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:25 am to Aristo
quote:
Not when the poors can't afford the new higher property taxes
Govt is what runs poor people out of d cent areas?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:26 am to Dawgfanman
Cost.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:31 am to Damone
quote:
If Obama made the rule, then Trump should go ahead and make another.
Trump needs to keep this rule but pick the cities, starting with DC and the northern VA suburbs. Then move on to San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and other liberal strongholds. They are the ones who support this so they shouldn't mind.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:32 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
San Francisco
Liberal San Fran has effectively taxed the poor out of any opportunity for home ownership.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:35 am to TigerB8
quote:
quote:
What makes the school good is the kids attending it.
Not exactly....it's parental involvement. When parents dont show to meetings, dont take part in what their kids are doing, the school slacks and you get a shite education. This is why the district my kids go to is good. Heck, the one next to us has asians, indians and persians from all over moving here to put their kids in this high school. And because of that, the house values are ridiculous.
pretty sure the poster you quoted understands good kids come from good parents ... it's the same thing ...
but, yes, the misnomer "good schools" is exasperating to hear ... teachers & staff, by and large, do not a good school/district make ...
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:39 am to ShortyRob
quote:
What makes the school good is the kids attending it.
This partially true.
What is more true is that what makes the school good is the parents of the kids attending it.
Every teacher will confirm this - you may have to polygraph them - but ultimately, you will get 100% concurrence on this point.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:49 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
What is more true is that what makes the school good is the parents of the kids attending it.
Well. Of course
My point is simply that school quality is a function of the population feeding it, not the school itself
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:53 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
Obama appointee doing the work she was called to do.
It's possible that this will not be all bad. The liberals want those poor people to live better...fine. Let them move in close to you and have a lot of their friends visit and hang out in front of their houses.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:54 am to upgrayedd
quote:
So bring shite bags into neighborhoods where people have worked their asses off to get what they have and the reward is lower property values and shitty kids destroying nice schools. Awesome.
ALMIGHTY FEDGOV IS BRINGING CULTURE TO YOUR NEXT-DOOR RESIDENTS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!
So predictable that FedGov would do such a thing.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:56 am to Champagne
is it a regulation or a piece of legislation? or a court ordered regulation?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 11:59 am to tiderider
quote:
is it a regulation or a piece of legislation? or a court ordered regulation?
It's policy implemented by HUD under Obama. The mistake was in not scrapping it immediately. Ben Carson announced he was delaying the policy for two years and this left it open for an activist judge to step in.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News