Started By
Message
locked post

Attorney General Jeff Session's Going After FBI - U1 Style

Posted on 12/21/17 at 7:48 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19821 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 7:48 am
quote:

Department of Justice (DOJ) officials are asking FBI investigators at Attorney General Jeff Session's request to describe evidence uncovered in an investigation into a uranium deal several years ago that has become known as Uranium One, NBC News reported early Thursday.


LINK
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 7:51 am to
It's happening

[on] off
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38355 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 7:52 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29996 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 7:53 am to
frick the Clintons. I hope they die in squalor and Chelse is forced to turn tricks and make porn for people with a horse-teeth fetish.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:01 am to
quote:

frick the Clintons. I hope they die in squalor and Chelse is forced to turn tricks and make porn for people with a horse-teeth fetish.


Damn..... Ill allow it.
Posted by cypressbrake3
Member since Oct 2014
3681 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:04 am to
Does anyone believe Sessions won't weanie out in the end?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Chelse is forced to turn tricks 



Webb will take care of his little girl.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:07 am to
I'm not sure. I was a big fan of Sessions as a senator but his action - or lack of action = as Attorney General has been a major disappointment. He has basically surrendered control of the department to Rosenstein.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
26051 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:11 am to
Lock her up!
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147361 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:11 am to
quote:

The sale was subject to approval by a nine-agency panel, which included the State Department. The State Department official who was part of the agency's approval said Clinton did not interfere in the dealings, NBC News noted.
NBC makes a good defense attorney. First time I have heard this load of crap. So the most corrupt Obama ordered appointees fromNINE agencies all said treason is groovy. Nothing to see here, move the frick along...
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17514 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:13 am to
quote:

frick the Clintons. I hope they die in squalor and Chelse is forced to turn tricks and make porn for people with a horse-teeth fetish.


Would watch, only for the hatred boner
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10224 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:14 am to
Once again... These 3 paragraphs from the original NYT U1 article say it all:

quote:

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month.


LINK
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35009 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:15 am to
quote:

I'm not sure. I was a big fan of Sessions as a senator but his action - or lack of action = as Attorney General has been a major disappointment. He has basically surrendered control of the department to Rosenstein.


Same here, Boat...but that I'll withhold judgment until the OIG Report due in mid-January. The evidence therein (or either the omission of it) will give Sessions an ultimatum. Either do His job...or let somebody who will take the helm.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147361 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:24 am to
Attention Everyone. Politifact says, there is nothing to see here move along. The approval for the sale of uranium was approved by lower levels of the State Dept. that HRC didn't know about...

quote:

As PolitiFact has laid out in great detail, there is no direct evidence of a quid pro quo among Clinton, the State Department, Rosatom and the Clinton Foundation donors with ties to Uranium One. Clinton has repeatedly denied any involvement in the State Department’s approval of the Uranium One sale, insisting that such approval was granted at lower levels of the department and would not have crossed the secretary’s desk.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99168 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I'm not sure. I was a big fan of Sessions as a senator but his action - or lack of action = as Attorney General has been a major disappointment


He is being VERY cautious (overly so, perhaps), but unlike Mueller, he want to avoid ANY appearances that could taint the results of any of his efforts.
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:26 am to
Merry Christmas
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147361 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:35 am to
quote:

On the orders of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Justice Department prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain the evidence they found in a now dormant criminal investigation into a controversial uranium deal that critics have linked to Bill and Hillary Clinton, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News.

The interviews with FBI agents are part of the Justice Department's effort to fulfill a promise an assistant attorney general made to Congress last month to examine whether a special counsel was warranted to look into what has become known as the Uranium One deal, a senior Justice Department official said.

At issue is a 2010 transaction in which the Obama Administration allowed the sale of U.S. uranium mining facilities to Russia's state atomic energy company. Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time, and the State Department was one of nine agencies that agreed to approve the deal after finding no threat to U.S. national security.

A senior law enforcement official who was briefed on the initial FBI investigation told NBC News there were allegations of corruption surrounding the process under which the U.S. government approved the sale. But no charges were filed.

As the New York Times reported in April 2015, some of the people associated with the deal contributed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. And Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a Moscow speech by a Russian investment bank with links to the transaction.

Hillary Clinton has denied playing any role in the decision by the State Department to approve the sale, and the State Department official who approved it has said Clinton did not intervene in the matter. That hasn't stopped some Republicans, including President Trump, from calling the arrangement corrupt — and urging that Clinton be investigated.

In a letter to Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Stephen Boyd said Justice Department lawyers would make recommendations to Sessions about whether an investigation should be opened or expanded, or whether a special counsel should be appointed to probe a number of issues of concern to Republicans.

In recent weeks, FBI agents who investigated the case have been asked by Justice Department prosecutors to describe the results of their probe. The agents also have been asked if there was any improper effort to squash a prosecution, the law enforcement sources say.

The senior Justice Department official said the questions were part of an effort by the Sessions team to get up to speed on the controversial case, in the face of allegations from Congressional Republicans that it was mishandled.

An FBI spokesman declined to comment.

On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement to sell a majority stake to the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

At the time, Uranium One's two licensed mining operations in Wyoming amounted to about 20 percent of all uranium mining production capacity in the U.S, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (That figure has since decreased.)

Because enriched uranium is a component of nuclear weapons, the deal required a national security review by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, The New York Times reported, Uranium One's Canadian chairman, Ian Telfer, used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the foundation, the Times reported, despite a promise to publicly identify all donors. The foundation later said it made a mistake.

Others associated with Uranium One also donated to the Clinton Foundation, according to the Times.

Sen John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, raised objections to the sale, saying it would "give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America's uranium production capacity."

The U.S. ambassador to Kazakhstan also raised concerns in cables to Clinton's State Department that Rosatom was acting on behalf of Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU, to gobble up uranium mines after Russia felt "squeezed" by having their uranium imports limited by other countries.

Nonetheless, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, known as CFIUS, approved the deal by a unanimous vote, according to public reports. Clinton was just one member of the nine member CFIUS by virtue of her role as Secretary of State. The other eight members of CFIUS came from Treasury, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Office of Science & Technology, and the Justice Department.
BTW: the CFIUS committee is appointed by the POTUS.
This post was edited on 12/21/17 at 8:40 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19821 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:35 am to
quote:

quote:
I'm not sure. I was a big fan of Sessions as a senator but his action - or lack of action = as Attorney General has been a major disappointment


He is being VERY cautious (overly so, perhaps), but unlike Mueller, he want to avoid ANY appearances that could taint the results of any of his efforts.


This appears to be the approach. DOJ under Sessions has been playing the long game. It looks like '18 could be explosive with with the release of the IG report and a separate report that was developed in secret by a portion of the HIC.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
26051 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton. The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said. Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month.


That’s gold Jerry. NYT doing work.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73548 posts
Posted on 12/21/17 at 8:39 am to
quote:

This appears to be the approach. DOJ under Sessions has been playing the long game. It looks like '18 could be explosive with with the release of the IG report and a separate report that was developed in secret by a portion of the HIC.


3 months before the midterms.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram