Started By
Message
locked post

Shocker: Judge Blocks Trump's Sanctuary City Ban

Posted on 11/21/17 at 6:54 am
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 6:54 am
LINK

quote:

U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick ruled that the White House does not have the authority to impose new conditions on spending already approved by Congress.


quote:

The judge’s ruling on Monday came after two California counties, San Francisco and Santa Clara, filed lawsuits against the Trump administration.


Can we get this shite to the Supreme Court already and just lump this in there with the travel ban?
This post was edited on 11/21/17 at 7:00 am
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29128 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 6:55 am to
yeah ... this sucks.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 6:59 am to
Why have we not sued these cities in court for their refusal to comply with federal law?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54252 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:02 am to
I would like to see the admin go ahead and honor their promise of withholding the money. Would give us good insight on if one man, a judge, has more policy influence than a whole branch of government.

Exactly what would happen if the admin defies the judge's order (he will be overturned as usual in CA)? Would this judge have the power to arrest someone within the admin?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67524 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:04 am to
Cali gonna Cali.....sucks for the country
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:08 am to
quote:

William Orrick


He's a regressive cocksmoker and Obama lapdog.
This post was edited on 11/21/17 at 7:11 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147957 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:10 am to
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:11 am to
It would be great if a lot of these judges (ESPECIALLY IN THE NINTH) got suddenly violently ill and could no longer do their jobs. frick them.
This post was edited on 11/21/17 at 7:12 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:13 am to
The federal judge — William Orrick — who just sided with the sanctuary city crowd and blocked President Donald Trump’s order to pull tax dollars from jurisdictions that insisted on breaking border laws happens to have a background that includes bundling donations for Barack Obama.
He’s not just an Obama fan, either. Orrick’s also raised campaign money for John Kerry during that Massachusetts senator’s 2004 try for the White House.

Orrick, according to an investigation from the Federalist conducted in July 2015, was not only nominated to his court position by Obama. He also served as a “major donor to and bundler for President Obama’s presidential campaign … [raising] at least $200,000 for Obama and [donating] $30,800 to committees supporting him,” the news outlet reported. LINK
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54252 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:14 am to
quote:

He's a regressive cocksmoker and Obama lapdog.


A little evidence to prove your point:

quote:

Federal Judge William Orrick III, who on Tuesday blocked President Trump's order to withhold federal funds from sanctuary cities, reportedly bundled hundreds of thousands of dollars for President Barack Obama.

Orrick, of the Northern District of California, issued an injunction against the Trump administration after the city of San Francisco and county of Santa Clara sued over the president's plan to withhold federal funds from municipalities that harbor illegal immigrants.

The same judge issued a restraining order in 2015 against the advocacy group responsible for undercover videos purporting to show Planned Parenthood employees plotting to sell baby organs.

At the time, The Federalist found that Orrick raised at least $200,000 for Obama and donated more than $30,000 to groups supporting him.


Posted by PeterPeterP
Member since Jan 2013
781 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:21 am to
This country is laughable. Only one in the world where there are safe zones for people who break laws.

Best part is the "undocumented" "Illegals" that stand out with signs protesting that they are in fact undocumented and illegal and "Aren't going anywhere". Slap in the face to people trying to come here legally. WE ARE A JOKE.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11086 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:22 am to
Muh 10th Amendment...
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20648 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:23 am to
There are other ways to deal with this. Just let it be known that US immigration laws aren’t being enforced in California and the federal government will let California handle this internally. Basically a hands off approach. Let California become a destination state for illegals across the US.

Federal government has the power to open/close military bases and can relocate a variety of federal offices that aren’t involved specifically in California. Just start moving stuff out however and wherever we can.

Can easily bring California to its knees so to speak. Much more effective ways to deal with California are available to Trump if he chooses to do so.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51064 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:23 am to
quote:

U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick ruled that the White House does not have the authority to impose new conditions on spending already approved by Congress.




That's comical right there. Juat because money is approved for a use does not mean it muat be spent for that use.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54252 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:31 am to
quote:

U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick


His dad served on the same court from 1974 until 2003. Died while in office. Was appointed by Tricky Dick.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12046 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:40 am to
Meh, making some more lawyers rich and just waiting until it reaches the right court where conservative judges will side with the administration. My money is still on POTUS & AG!!
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
25059 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Why have we not sued these cities in court for their refusal to comply with federal law?




The leaders pushing/allowing the breaking of the law should be arrested, fined and prosecuted.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12046 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:43 am to
Shocker.....NOT!
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43078 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 8:01 am to
quote:

power to open/close military bases


hmmm - not good for national security, but if we think about it politically (like the DEMs do with everything) then we should move those bases to states which are just marginally blue - or about to go blue. Another conservative factor in those states might tip the next election. Let California go 80% blue instead of just 75%.
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:15 am to
Is there an oath or law that requires local police to enforce federal laws?

Isn't that the job for the FBI and other federal organizations?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram