Started By
Message
locked post

Can we all agree this is a bad idea???

Posted on 10/20/17 at 1:57 pm
Posted by acrossenemylinesmofo
Member since Sep 2016
91 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 1:57 pm
Congress debating whether to cap 401k contributions to $2400 to increase tax revenue.

LINK
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29031 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Can we all agree this is a bad idea???



quote:

Congress


yep.
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32673 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 1:59 pm to
Yes. There will be a time in my lifetime when they come for 401k monies in entirety and not just try to cap allowable contributions.

It's already been floated a few times as a trial balloon.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134938 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:00 pm to
So now the folks that are supposedly for small govt now want you to depend on the govt for your retirement.
Posted by GeauxLax
Roswell, GA
Member since Apr 2016
288 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:00 pm to
Yes
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20521 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Congress debating whether to cap 401k contributions to $2400 to increase tax revenue.


If these frickers would quit spending more than the U.S. government takes in they wouldn't be trying to trick frick everyone at every turn.

Hate these sorry bastards. ALL of them.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9054 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:08 pm to
I would like to think that if anything like this began gaining serious traction, people in their 30s and 40s would turn out in droves to vote out every incumbent member of congress.

Wishful thinking, of course.
Posted by DabosDynasty
Member since Apr 2017
5179 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:08 pm to
Yep. It would serve to increase the reliance on a bankrupt Social Security. Just trying to create more “give me more for free” voters.
This post was edited on 10/20/17 at 2:10 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11834 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

increase tax revenue.


Not the issue.... issue is they spend more then they take in. give them more they will just spend more


also, if we raised taxes to match spending we will need to raise taxes again next year because entitlement spending is growing faster then rate of GDP....


we have a spending problem....plain and simple
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68362 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

increase tax revenue


I thought revenues were at all-time highs?

Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
5479 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:11 pm to
I'd be willing to bet that Trump signs this if it gets passed.
Posted by cameronml
Member since Oct 2007
1909 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:11 pm to
And this tax deal continues to look more and more like a gigantic F-You to the middle class.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32719 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 2:13 pm to
That is a massive reduction. Even modest company matches would have to change.

Company Can't match 6% if you can only contribute 2.5%
This post was edited on 10/20/17 at 2:14 pm
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32763 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:21 pm to
I thought this whole thing was about the middle class? Getting rid of this deduction would be a huge blow to the middle class. FWIW I’m ok with getting rid of basically all deductions and just slashing the tax rates/simplifying the tax code.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27327 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:52 pm to
It's fricking ridiculous. They can't help but look for more ways to reach into people's pockets.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 3:58 pm to
It's a matter of time before liberals get their hands on 401K money. The average American doesn't give a frick about promises made to people previously. It's why I find Roth IRA is to be somewhat suspect. Eventually there's going to be a bunch of people with large accounts in Congress is going to have something that sounds really cool and free for everybody else or at the least they'll justify the theft in the name of avoiding some pain.

Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Congress debating whether to cap 401k contributions


Time to 100% privatize under a different name
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30048 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 4:27 pm to
Take your old age money to give to people without money so they can live to old age and continue to siphon of you when you get to be old. frick the government
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63259 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Congress debating whether to cap 401k contributions to $2400 to increase tax revenue.



That would fricking suck.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36719 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 8:19 pm to
It's a bad idea.

But as long as they stay away from Roth, I'm selfishly ok with it
This post was edited on 10/20/17 at 8:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram