Started By
Message
locked post

Prison Population Timeline in the US

Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:39 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
36340 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:39 pm

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69938 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
21057 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:48 pm to
The graph isn't clear on the 1920 number, but it looks to be around 150,000. The population of the United States in 1920 was 106.5 million, so about .001% of the population was incarcerated in 1920.

The number in 2014 looks to be about 2.4 million. The population of the United States in 2010 was 309.3 million. So, that's about .007% of the population.

Considering the amount of things you can go to jail for these days (i.e. drugs) it doesn't seem to be that huge of a jump to me.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
20175 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:49 pm to
Wow. That is a lot of drugs.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 8:50 pm to
Pretty clear the crack epidemic and the subsequent war on drugs lead to the explosion.
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 8:52 pm
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
24041 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:33 pm to
Alot less people are following the rules nowadays.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
42422 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 9:59 pm to
Does that correspond with single motherhood in the black community? I just assumed the first generation of kids growing up without dads we're starting to get arrested in the 80s
Posted by Loungefly85
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2016
7930 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 10:17 pm to
It took about 20 years to start seeing the damage from LBJ's great society and it's only getting worse.
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12138 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 10:34 pm to
Slapahoe's solution to our growing prison problems-

1. No sentence should be longer than 18 years. In 18 years we go from a crying infant to a completely independent human being; so that should be enough time for someone to change who they are. If you're willing to throw someone in prison for longer than that, then I say just strap them into Old Sparky and flip the switch.

2. Prison shouldn't be an opportunity for them to form gangs and such; work them from can see to can't. They should be so physically exhausted that all they want to do when they get back to the barracks is sleep. Prison should resemble the first 45 minutes of Full Metal Jacket, minus the guns.

I know some will just fold their arms and say "I ain't doing that." That's fine, don't feed them, don't clothe them, make them sleep outside in the weather ... eventually they'll either come around or die.

3. After a suitable length of time of the intensive "physical training" (however long it takes to mentally break someone), if they've been behaved, allow them to spend a couple of days a week indoors, without someone yelling in their ear constantly, as long as they spend that time learning a trade, getting a basic education, taking a civics course - so they may learn their place in society, and so on. As they do well, reward them with more study days and fewer physical training days.

4. Towards the end of their sentence (last six months or so) allow the prisoners to live in an environment that more closely resembles the outside. They should see what it is like to go to work, get a normal paycheck, pay bills, and spend their extra money/free time how they choose. Let the parole board observe them during this period to determine if they've learned enough to safely re enter society.

5. Anyone sent to prison for a gang related crime should not be released into the same region from whence they came, and no two members of the same gang should ever be housed together.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
54667 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 10:35 pm to
the increase in prison population is due to better police work and technology
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
36340 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:41 pm to
Initially thought to be a wonder drug, in the late 19th century cocaine was a key ingredient in medicines used to combat asthma, dysentery, sore nipples, syphilis and – ironically – to fight opium addiction.

Prohibition, however, created both a black market and a certain chic, the results of which remain with us now. From that point on, whatever temporary high cocaine gave to its users, its dealers got an incomparably greater financial buzz.


The stupendous riches to be made, and their attendant cost in crime, murder and blighted lives, means that the U.S. now spends $40?billion annually on its ‘war against drugs’.



Alcohol and Nicotine...America's biggest problem when it comes to health crisis and drain on healthcare and costs to other Americans.

Cocaine and Weed - almost neglible. No effect on taxpayers and health care systems but for the war on drugs. The only effect is over-crowding prisons - which takes money out of your pocket if you are a tax-payer.

You are being fleeced for no reason...when banning of alcohol would decrease crime and taxes 10X more than "illicit drugs."
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:42 pm
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 5:42 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/4/20 at 6:38 am
Posted by Rex Feral
Athens
Member since Jan 2014
12432 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 7:27 am to
Forget prisons. Send them all to Mexico and use the cash savings to big a bigger wall along the border. With a moat.
Posted by Thrawn
Huntsville, AL
Member since Sep 2017
194 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:19 am to
I wonder how much the prison population would go down over the next ten years with a widespread enacting of capital punishment.

Granted, we'd have to do something about the "can't give consent while drunk." problem or things would get really bad.
Posted by TennesseeFan25
Honolulu
Member since May 2016
8391 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:17 pm to
It's not like they had any methodology of catching criminals in the 1920's. If you committed a crime, no one saw it, good job, you got away with it.

Additionally, our population and culture are different now than then.
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 12:17 pm
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
58801 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 1:11 pm to
How does that graph correlate with population growth and the influence of technology? Security cameras/social media/etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram