Started By
Message

re: Mickey Mantle hit a ball 565 feet

Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:52 pm to
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:52 pm to
Lol, 620. GTFO
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Don't make a frick either way. Players are juiced and the balls are juiced to the gills as well.


Which further proves my point. A juiced ball, plus a juiced athlete & mick could hit it 100 feet further? Yeah, uhhh no. Not to mention Canseco, McGwire, Sosa, Bonds, etc never came close to that either
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27340 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

And the Babe could hit it even further. I believe it. Those guys just knew how to hit.
You guys are so fricking gullible.

Is there any sport where records still stand from the 1930's?

Look at the track times from the 1930's. Do people get slower as time goes on? Of course not.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:57 pm to
Babe Ruth wouldn't make a roster today lol
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35730 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:59 pm to
Does Mantle look like a chump compared to today's hitters even though he wasn't on roids?

Does he?

I don't think so.

Human evolution doesn't work in one or two generations.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:02 pm to
6'0" 195. He's the size of an undersized 2nd baseman in today's game

No, HUMAN evolution doesn't happen that fast, but ATHLETIC evolution does
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27340 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Human evolution doesn't work in one or two generations.
Human evolution doesn't but the talent pool is way bigger today and athletes today take training way more seriously than back then.

I swear people get fricking retarded when talking about great players from a long time ago.

quote:

Does Mantle look like a chump compared to today's hitters even though he wasn't on roids?
He was 6'0" and 195 lbs. As a power hitter, yeah he really does.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:05 pm
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:03 pm to
Schmelly...I'm gonna say this nicely... take the cock out of your mouth. Everyone thinks you're a bitch.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Schmelly...I'm gonna say this nicely... take the cock out of your mouth. Everyone thinks you're a bitch.


You took a poll, douche canoe?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111235 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Human evolution doesn't work in one or two generations.

Watch some NBA highlights from the same timeframe Mantle played...
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17117 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:11 pm to


Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35730 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:18 pm to
And Bob Beamon's record stood for 25 years before it was broken (by 2 measly inches)...and Jesse Owens own long-jump record stood for 25 years before it was broken.

That's the advancement of sports.

Baby steps...baby steps...

To say Ruth or Mantle couldn't play today is absurd. Totally fricking absurd.

And if eyewitnesses and newspapers account for balls being hit out of stadiums in real live pitchers for real live games - speed plus force - not batting practice HR derby.

I know fake news is a thing now - but are we now going back and saying the media always just made shite up about Ruth and people like Mantle and that they sucked and fans were duped?
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:19 pm
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:22 pm to
Whatever man. Lol
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14526 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

To say Ruth or Mantle


I said Ruth, not Mantle
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27340 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Jesse Owens own long-jump record stood for 25 years before it was broken.
Jesse Owens would not even own the Texas high school boys record today. That's not hyperbole. The Texas high school record is longer than Jesse Owens' record setting jump.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:33 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48314 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:28 pm to
Mantle and Ruth hit more home runs than 99% of the players that play tday. They did it in much bigger ballparks and without steroids tdays strength and conditioning or diets plus they were out all night drinking and womanizing but it's impossible to think they hit long home runs? This generation has an obsession with revisionist history and competition instead of them having to surpass records it's easier for them to deface the records and move ahead by default instead of earning their place in history. It's the entire mindset of the modern age.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:33 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27340 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

They did it in much bigger ballparks
Lie. They were way shorter down the lines.

quote:

without steroids tdays strength and conditioning or diets plus they were out all night drinking and womanizing.
Yeah, so did the pitchers. They also threw with dead arms from pitching so much and didn't have near the stuff pitchers do today.

quote:

But it's impossible to think they hit long home runs?
Do you believe in fairy tales? You seem susceptible.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48314 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:34 pm to
Lmfao a lie? Wow the ignorance is palpable just because one ballpark on your Xbox was short in the corners doesn't mean they all were and how many of their home runs were 5-7 feet from the foul poles? It's not a fairy tale it's fact. Ballparks built today are specifically designed to promote home runs as opposed to the gigantic parks Mantle and Ruth played in try doing your homework next time. Polo grounds 500 feet in center when it opened, Yankees stadium 490 feet in center until 1923, tiger stadium 467 in center when it opened there isn't a park within 55 feet of any of those places now much less some of the other monster parks back in the day.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:47 pm
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22520 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Because 2 goliaths hitting BP could only hit 1 513.


the argument would be you hit a fastball farther than a can of corn from you 90 year old dixie league coach.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27340 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Lmfao a lie? Wow the ignorance is palpable just because one ballpark on your Xbox was short in the corners doesn't mean they all were and how many of their home runs were 5-7 feet from the foul poles? It's not a fairy tale it's fact. Ballparks built today are specifically designed to promote home runs as opposed to the gigantic parks Mantle and Ruth played in try doing your homework next time.
Name some old ballparks.

Polo Grounds: 279 to left and 258 to right.

Ebbets Field: 384 to center and 297 to right.

Original Yankee Stadium: 285 to left, 295 to right.



Yeah, some old ballparks were like 500+ feet to center, but nobody was hitting them out to center. They were short as shite down the lines.

I also wonder how many inside the park homeruns were hit back then if you hit it over the center fielder's head.
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 10:47 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram