Started By
Message

re: First human ancestors came from Europe not Africa 7.2 million-year-old fossils indicate

Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27350 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:20 pm to
The land of whitey is the cradle of civilization.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36571 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

The land of whitey is the cradle of civilization.



You people are weird.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

not Africa.


quote:

Sounds like this part is very important to you.


Why shouldn't it be important to me?
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35811 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:22 pm to
quote:


Was that desert even there back then? I know much of that area used to be good land.


They know Egypt was in Africa and south along the Nile river very lush and green - part of the fertile crescent. Rainfall was like India monsoons.

There was some cataclysm 10,000 years ago.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 5:23 pm
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44176 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

Just that millions of years ago the climate was very different in varied places.

Are you saying that Earth's climate can change naturally--not just by changes in greenhouse gas concentrations, sulfate aerosols, and soot?
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17114 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

They say it wasn't a desert back then, but rather a forest. Anyways, this evidence doesn't dispel the Out of Africa theory, it merely suggests that our ancestors were in Europe much sooner than previously thought. Big difference.


There's two questions:

1) Are the dates accurate?

2) Is this fossil an ancestor of humans (homo sapiens sapiens)?

Point 1 will be easy to verify. Point two will take more research and review by a lot of experts.

I agree it doesn't necessarily disprove OOA. It depends on (mostly) the second question.
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

This is what is so awesome about science. They update their conclusions based on available evidence.


Which is why it's dangerous to claim "the science is settled".
Posted by Dave Worth
Metairie
Member since Dec 2003
1831 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that Earth's climate can change naturally--not just by changes in greenhouse gas concentrations, sulfate aerosols, and soot?


Yep. I don't deny that climate change is happening today. I just don't know enough to say that it is or is not caused entirely or partially by man.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44176 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:28 pm to
I'm right there with you.
I was just being a passive-aggressive jackass.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36571 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

2) Is this fossil an ancestor of humans (homo sapiens sapiens)?



I'm reading the paper but it seems what is remarkable about this fossil is that it is distinct from a Ouranopithecus macedoniensis as well as being distinct from chimpanzees, meaning that there is a possibility that this fossil represents an early hominid. It doesn't do anything to suggest that the H. erectus theory from East Africa is incorrect.

This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 5:30 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:32 pm to
Some new studies suggest the Sahara Desert is at least 7 million years old.

LINK

quote:

The movement of tectonic plates that created the Mediterranean Sea and the Alps also sparked the drying of the Sahara some 7 million years ago, according to the latest computer simulations of Earth’s ancient climate.

Though North Africa is currently covered by the world’s largest non-polar desert, climate conditions in the region have not been constant there for the last several million years. Subtle changes in Earth’s tilt toward the sun periodically increase the amount of solar energy received by the Northern Hemisphere in summer, altering atmospheric currents and driving monsoon rains. North Africa also sees more precipitation when less of the planet’s water is locked up in ice. Such increases in moisture limit how far the Sahara can spread and can even spark times of a “green Sahara”, when the sparse desert is replaced by abundant lakes, plants and animals.

Before the great desert was born, North Africa had a moister, semiarid climate. A few lines of evidence, including ancient dune deposits found in Chad, had hinted that the arid Sahara may have existed at least 7 million years ago. But without a mechanism to explain how it emerged, few scientists thought that the desert we see today could really be that old. Instead, most scientists argue that the Sahara took shape just 2 to 3 million years ago. Terrestrial and marine evidence suggest that North Africa underwent a period of drying at that time, when the Northern Hemisphere started its most recent cycle of glaciation.


Now Zhongshi Zhang of the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research in Bergen, Norway, and colleagues have run simulations of climate change in North Africa over the last 30 million years. Their simulations take into account changes in Earth’s orbital position, atmospheric chemistry and the ratio of land to ocean as driven by tectonic forces. The models shows that precipitation in North Africa declined by more than half about 7 million years ago, causing the region to dry out. But this effect could not be explained by changes in vegetation, Earth’s tilt or greenhouse gas concentrations—leaving tectonic action.

About 250 million years ago, a huge body of water called the Tethys Sea separated the supercontinents of Laurasia to the north and Gondwana to the south. As those supercontinents broke apart and shuffled around, the African plate collided with the Eurasian plate, birthing the Alps and the Himalayas but closing off the bulk of the Tethys Sea. As the plates kept moving, the sea continued to shrink, eventually diminishing into the Mediterranean.

What set off the aridification in Africa was the replacement of the western arm of the Tethys Sea with the Arabian Peninsula around 7 to 11 million years ago. Replacing water with land, which reflects less sunlight, altered the region’s precipitation patterns. This created the desert and heightened its sensitivity to changes in Earth’s tilt, the researchers conclude in a study published today in Nature.

The emergence of the Sahara 7 million years ago would have affected the plants and animals in the region—and possibly the early ancestors of human beings.

This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 5:56 pm
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33974 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

1) Are the dates accurate?


The journal (PLOS One) is a good one. The data may even be posted online. At the very least, this article is transparent and peer-reviewed.

2) Is this fossil an ancestor of humans (homo sapiens sapiens)?[/quote]

That's what the article said, but that is probably based on a theoretical link, which could change with additional evidence.

quote:

It depends on (mostly) the second question.


Could be that the OOA theory is wrong. Could be that the timeline is pushed back and homonins left Africa earlier than we thought. I'm not an expert on this subject though.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110063 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


That's because the Sahara Desert wasn't formed until about 7,000 years ago. Humans had long left Africa before then.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:37 pm to
quote:


But the fossilised hominim is not necessarily our earliest ancestor 
why would you start a thread title that says the opposite of this
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24648 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:38 pm to
I've always wondered why intelligent humanoids/bipeds would choose an extremely hot climate like Africa over a lush place to live. This seems to make sense.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

1) Are the dates accurate?


Well I didn't see that they mentioned how they were dated. Potassium argon dating is relatively accurate, but its not absolutely perfect.
quote:

2) Is this fossil an ancestor of humans (homo sapiens sapiens)?


No, it is just an early hominin. So a human like creature. The family tree of hominins (and hominids) are really complex.
quote:

I agree it doesn't necessarily disprove OOA

It most certainly doesn't disprove OOA in any way shape or form. Australopithecines was form africa, as was homo erectus. And homo ergator.

Not to mention the oldest homo sapiens fossils were found in africa.

shite is complex, and we can't even comprehend of the time scales involved.
Posted by ThruThickandThin
The Zone
Member since Mar 2017
1445 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:39 pm to
No wonder I'm so smart
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69491 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:39 pm to
Our origins as human beings are not on this planet, or at least are not the result of processes of this world.

george noory has made compelling arguments that aliens used primate dna to form humans.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40257 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:39 pm to
I thought science was settled?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31067 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


Was it a desert that long ago?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram