- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump tells SK they need to pay for missle defense
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:32 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:32 am
LINK
LINK
but SK say no chance
art of the deal??
winning?
LINK
but SK say no chance
quote:
SEOUL, South Korea — President Trump’s comment that he wants South Korea to pay for a missile defense system being set up in the country jolted its presidential race on Friday and surprised the government, leaving it scrambling to figure out the intentions of a close ally.In an interview with Reuters on Thursday, Mr. Trump said that he wanted South Korea to pay for the system, known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, whose cost he estimated at $1 billion
quote:
Contrary to Mr. Trump’s remarks, South Korea has repeatedly said that it would provide the land and build the base needed for the Thaad missile battery and that the United States would pay for the deployment, operation and maintenance of the system, which was purchased from Lockheed Martin.
quote:
On Friday, the South Korean Defense Ministry said it was not changing that stance. Some wondered whether the government had made a secret agreement under which South Korea would help pay for the system. The government must clarify whether Mr. Trump’s comments reflect his “unilateral wishful thinking” or whether there is such a deal that has not been shared with the public, Son Kum-ju, a spokesman of the opposition People’s Party, said on Friday.
art of the deal??
winning?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
but SK say no chance
Why would they want to pay? better for us to subsidize another top 20 economy.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
"You have a nice country here, be a shame if anything happened to it"
The man basically goes out of his way to alienate long-term allies.
The man basically goes out of his way to alienate long-term allies.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 11:34 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
The President that negotiated this should be lauded or criticized for paying $1B to defend SK when they could have participated in the cost to defend themselves.
Who negotiated us spending $1B on this defense system?
If it was O, I have no problem trying to re-negotiate.
If it was Trump, then he should have thought about that earlier.
Who was it?
Who negotiated us spending $1B on this defense system?
If it was O, I have no problem trying to re-negotiate.
If it was Trump, then he should have thought about that earlier.
Who was it?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
What is the problem in trying to make them pay for it?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:39 am to StraightCashHomey21
They have a presidential election in a week or so. I wonder how stuff like this affects the race.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 11:42 am
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:44 am to StraightCashHomey21
I wonder if he has the balls to say the same thing to Israel.
I doubt it though
I doubt it though
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:48 am to StraightCashHomey21
I am with Trump on this.
Samsung BY ITSELF could easily pay for this.
Samsung BY ITSELF could easily pay for this.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:53 am to StraightCashHomey21
Liberals: reeee why are we spending so much on the military
Trump: ok Korea needs to start paying us for protection
Liberals: reeee you can't say that! They need us!
Trump: ok Korea needs to start paying us for protection
Liberals: reeee you can't say that! They need us!
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:00 pm to StraightCashHomey21
He's doing what he said he'd do. We offer protection for many of our allies and aren't getting compensated for it. Why shouldn't we pull out entirely and say "let us know when you need help in combat" instead of spending countless dollars placing troops and arms in their backyards?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 pm to StraightCashHomey21
THAAD is there mainly protect the US troops and people in the US mainland. It would be in America's best interests to have THAAD. THAAD does not protect South Korea...North Korea could destroy Seoul in minutes and THAAD can't protect against those type of missiles. SK does pay the US troops to be in SK, so It's not like they're getting everything for free.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:25 pm to StraightCashHomey21
If they don't give a frick about missile defense why should we. frick em. Let NK fire away.
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:31 pm to StraightCashHomey21
South Korea is among the worst free riders out there. Make em pay.
They have the ability to pay and should.
Why would anyone have a problem with making them pay?
They have the ability to pay and should.
Why would anyone have a problem with making them pay?
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:35 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I have no problem with Trump telling SK that, "Those Chinese televisions and hand held devices are really looking good, right now. Maybe they'd prefer we pull out and sell us their crap? What do you think?"
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:47 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Someone will pay one way or another because Lockheed has some of the best lobbyists in the world. They won't get screwed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News