Started By
Message
locked post

Trump tells SK they need to pay for missle defense

Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:32 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125564 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:32 am
LINK

LINK



but SK say no chance

quote:

SEOUL, South Korea — President Trump’s comment that he wants South Korea to pay for a missile defense system being set up in the country jolted its presidential race on Friday and surprised the government, leaving it scrambling to figure out the intentions of a close ally.In an interview with Reuters on Thursday, Mr. Trump said that he wanted South Korea to pay for the system, known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, whose cost he estimated at $1 billion



quote:

Contrary to Mr. Trump’s remarks, South Korea has repeatedly said that it would provide the land and build the base needed for the Thaad missile battery and that the United States would pay for the deployment, operation and maintenance of the system, which was purchased from Lockheed Martin.


quote:

On Friday, the South Korean Defense Ministry said it was not changing that stance. Some wondered whether the government had made a secret agreement under which South Korea would help pay for the system. The government must clarify whether Mr. Trump’s comments reflect his “unilateral wishful thinking” or whether there is such a deal that has not been shared with the public, Son Kum-ju, a spokesman of the opposition People’s Party, said on Friday.


art of the deal??

winning?

Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:33 am to
quote:

but SK say no chance



Why would they want to pay? better for us to subsidize another top 20 economy.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:33 am to
"You have a nice country here, be a shame if anything happened to it"

The man basically goes out of his way to alienate long-term allies.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 11:34 am
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141558 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:35 am to
The President that negotiated this should be lauded or criticized for paying $1B to defend SK when they could have participated in the cost to defend themselves.

Who negotiated us spending $1B on this defense system?

If it was O, I have no problem trying to re-negotiate.

If it was Trump, then he should have thought about that earlier.

Who was it?
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:35 am to
What is the problem in trying to make them pay for it?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51518 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:39 am to
They have a presidential election in a week or so. I wonder how stuff like this affects the race.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 11:42 am
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23489 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:44 am to
I wonder if he has the balls to say the same thing to Israel.

I doubt it though
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17114 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:48 am to
I am with Trump on this.

Samsung BY ITSELF could easily pay for this.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18431 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 11:53 am to
Liberals: reeee why are we spending so much on the military
Trump: ok Korea needs to start paying us for protection
Liberals: reeee you can't say that! They need us!
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:00 pm to
He's doing what he said he'd do. We offer protection for many of our allies and aren't getting compensated for it. Why shouldn't we pull out entirely and say "let us know when you need help in combat" instead of spending countless dollars placing troops and arms in their backyards?
Posted by lilaznfish123
Arlington, VA
Member since Sep 2013
618 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 pm to
THAAD is there mainly protect the US troops and people in the US mainland. It would be in America's best interests to have THAAD. THAAD does not protect South Korea...North Korea could destroy Seoul in minutes and THAAD can't protect against those type of missiles. SK does pay the US troops to be in SK, so It's not like they're getting everything for free.
Posted by Sable Hat
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2017
26 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:25 pm to
If they don't give a frick about missile defense why should we. frick em. Let NK fire away.
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
6500 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:31 pm to
South Korea is among the worst free riders out there. Make em pay.

They have the ability to pay and should.

Why would anyone have a problem with making them pay?
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45968 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:35 pm to
I have no problem with Trump telling SK that, "Those Chinese televisions and hand held devices are really looking good, right now. Maybe they'd prefer we pull out and sell us their crap? What do you think?"
Posted by 8thyearsenior
Centennial, CO
Member since Mar 2006
4280 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:47 pm to
Someone will pay one way or another because Lockheed has some of the best lobbyists in the world. They won't get screwed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram