- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:59 am to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:59 am to tgrbaitn08
I don't know. I don't know the definition of manslaughter. I do have a problem with him being charged with one thing and when the state can't prove that charge they can fall back on something else.
To me you should only charge what you can prove, if you fail then get better at your job.
To me you should only charge what you can prove, if you fail then get better at your job.
1
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:00 am to LNCHBOX
I was being sarcastic, dumbass.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:01 am to LNCHBOX
Nobody on the jury bought that bs. Not 1
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:04 am to Janky
quote:
I was being sarcastic, dumbass.
So according to you, I need to shut where frick up. But whatever bullshite you spout out is OK? Nice.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:04 am to diat150
quote:
Nobody on the jury bought that bs. Not 1
Link?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:04 am to diat150
On another note, was he sentenced yet? If not, when will he be?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:05 am to diat150
quote:
Nobody on the jury bought that bs. Not 1
Didn't realize you had inside sources in the jury. Regardless, not one person said what Janky claimed.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:05 am to Janky
2/17 but I thought u knew everything already
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:06 am to LNCHBOX
Count 1 nit guilty
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:06 am to diat150
was that charge specifically for the damage to the vehicle?
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 8:08 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:07 am to diat150
You sure know a lot about nothing
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:07 am to Chad504boy
Never claimed to know everything. In fact, I have stated several times that I don't know much about this. That is why I ask so many questions. However, I also get to have an opinion and I believe the call that the collision was intentional is bullshite.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:19 am to Janky
I followed the whole trial mostly through this thread and I think the corrrct conviction was reached. Obviously I did not hear everything that was said but I think this was a classic case of "when keeping it real goes wrong"
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:32 am to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Did you slam into the person on purpose and exit your vehicle with a gun in your hand?
No, because the other person was not acting aggressively
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:36 am to LSUTANGERINE
The big bad white boy with no shirt calling you a **** scares you?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:36 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No, because the other person was not acting aggressively
Had they been acting aggressively, would you have gotten out of your vehicle brandishing a gun? Or stayed in vehicle and called police, possibly holding gun for your protection?
Not trying to be a smartass, real question.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:51 am to tgrbaitn08
quote:
You sure know a lot about nothing
I know BS when I see it.
quote:
The jurors, who deliberated for 5 hours and 40 minutes, also voted 10-2 to convict Hayes of attempted manslaughter for shooting Racquel Smith, but unanimously acquitted Hayes of aggravated criminal damage to property, deciding he didn't intentionally ram the Smiths' Mercedes-Benz SUV with his Hummer H2, after contending that a drunken Smith rear-ended him first on Magazine Street.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 8:52 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:53 am to Chad504boy
quote:The only unanimous verdict was that of not guilty for the criminal intent to damage
Link?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:54 am to Festus
quote:
Had they been acting aggressively, would you have gotten out of your vehicle brandishing a gun? Or stayed in vehicle and called police, possibly holding gun for your protection?
Not trying to be a smartass, real question.
He would have been in a much better position had he stayed in his vehicle. Same can be said for Will Smith. If you believe someone rammed you intentionally why would you ever leave the protection of your vehicle, especially if you have a gun.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 8:55 am to tgrbaitn08
quote:Dude you are becoming worse than chad with withholding facts to fit a narrative. he didnt just call him a n****, he said "i'm going TO KILL YOU N****"
The big bad white boy with no shirt calling you a **** scares you?
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 8:55 am
Page 240 of 248
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News