- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:32 am to Janky
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:32 am to Janky
quote:
I don't like how someone can be charged with one thing and not be found guilty on that charge but on a lesser one.
I find that kind of sketchy too, but not as sketchy as the state withholding an aggravated assault with a firearm charge just so they have something to fall back on in case this trial goes bad. If he would have gotten a not guilty last night, then had to go through another trial for the same incident, I would have a problem with that. The state should lay all their cards out on the table from the beginning.
0
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:32 am to Gris Gris
quote:
If Hernandez hadn't been an idiot and Smith been drunk, no one would have been injured or died.
Or if Hayes hadn't smashed into the back of a vehicle? Let's remember there were more parties at fault here than just Hernandez and Smith.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:36 am to tigerpimpbot
Quit putting words in my mouth you bafroom. I was pumping guilty and guilty he was.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:58 am to King Teal
quote:
He shoulda got off sounds like he was just defending himself from a deranged ex-NFL player with road rage.
This is a victory for gun control advocates everywhere. Who says a man can't defend himself with fire when he's attacked? The NFL player starter shooting first is what I read in the Advocate.
Christ have mercy.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:59 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
Or if Hayes hadn't smashed into the back of a vehicle? Let's remember there were more parties at fault here than just Hernandez and Smith.
I've ran into the back of someone and it's happened to me twice. Amazingly, no one was shot or killed and there wasn't even a confrontation .
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:04 am to Chad504boy
Referring to the 2 that wanted murder charges:
Why or how??
quote:
Has to affect sentencing knowing that
Why or how??
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I've ran into the back of someone and it's happened to me twice. Amazingly, no one was shot or killed and there wasn't even a confrontation .
Did you slam into the person on purpose and exit your vehicle with a gun in your hand?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:14 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Mike Perlstein came back and said it wasn't unanimous after all. Said it was 10-2, the 2 wanting 2d degree Murder.
That says a lot. Not one person on the jury thought it was self defense.
Where all are the self defense posters that were on here last week saying Hayes feared for his life and acted in self defense?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:16 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
it's happened to me twice.
Color me shocked that you've been hit from the back.
Twice.
jk- hope you're neck and back's OKThis post was edited on 12/12/16 at 7:17 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:21 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I've ran into the back of someone and it's happened to me twice. Amazingly, no one was shot or killed and there wasn't even a confrontation .
Good job on not doing what Hayes did.
The victim blaming (not by you necessarily) now that the verdict has been decided on is absurd. Perhaps if Hernandez had been the one killed, I could understand it. But that's not what went down.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:24 am to LNCHBOX
Did Hayes or the evidence say if he shot Raquel on purpose?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:29 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:if I rennet right, he testified that he did not know he shot her. That's the only evidence regarding her shooting I recall at the moment.
Did Hayes or the evidence say if he shot Raquel on purpose?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:43 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I've ran into the back of someone and it's happened to me twice. Amazingly, no one was shot or killed and there wasn't even a confrontation .
Did you know that according to those here and an "expert" you did it intentionally because you didn't apply your brakes 30 seconds before impact?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:47 am to Janky
quote:
Did you know that according to those here and an "expert" you did it intentionally because you didn't apply your brakes 30 seconds before impact?
Literally no one has said anything like that.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:50 am to Janky
Janky are you here to say that justice has prevailed and the system worked? Or are you going to continue to whine like a baby that Hayes was acting in self defense?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:52 am to tgrbaitn08
I don't believe I ever said it was self defense. I was pretty indifferent on which way it went. However, I will continue to call bullshite on elements of the trial I believe to be.
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 7:56 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:55 am to Janky
quote:
However, I will continue to call bullshite on elements of the trial I believe to be.
Nothing in that last post of your was an element of the trial.
ETA: Or maybe I missed the testimony. Can you link me to where the expert said you had to hit the brakes 30 seconds prior to contact for the hit to not be intentional?
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 7:57 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:56 am to Janky
So you agree with the verdict?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:57 am to LNCHBOX
So, an expert did not says Hayes intentionally ran into Smith?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 7:57 am to Janky
quote:
So, an expert did not says Hayes intentionally ran into Smith?
You left out your bullshite number of 30 seconds.
Page 239 of 248
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News