Started By
Message
locked post

Raging debate with a friend of mine. Please offer insight!

Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:19 pm
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
7592 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:19 pm
Could guys like Red Grange start in the NFL today. Could Babe Ruth start on a baseball team today, etc. You get the gist. I say no.
Posted by RaphsDoublePlay
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
92 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:19 pm to
No
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35618 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:21 pm to
No.
advances in nutrition and the level of competition are totally different.
Some could compete, but not dominate by any means.
Posted by Creamer
louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
2817 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:21 pm to
Those guys did not workout or do any conditioning.babe Ruth wouldn't even know the pitch had passed him by.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
28601 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:22 pm to
No they suck.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36588 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:22 pm to
Yes, Babe Ruth could play today.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27139 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:22 pm to
No
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89851 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Could guys like Red Grange start in the NFL today.




Red grange wouldn't start for an NAIA team today
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128473 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:23 pm to
If Babe Ruth was given the same advantages as modern athletes, yes.

Red Grange, I seriously doubt it.
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
45372 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Raging debate


How raging?
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36588 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

If Babe Ruth was given the same advantages as modern athletes, yes.

Red Grange, I seriously doubt it.





Ruth used bats up to 54 ounces and played in parks that are bigger than today's parks. He'd do fine
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:27 pm to
Any baseball player from a past era who "dominated" during there playing years could certainly play today, but probably would be average to low level by today's standards.

Football, because of the size and speed of today's athletes would dominate players from the 60's.
Posted by Richard Castle
St. George, La.
Member since Nov 2012
1896 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

No
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52520 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Could guys like Red Grange start in the NFL today. Could Babe Ruth start on a baseball team today, etc. You get the gist. I say no
No. They have inferior genetics compared to today's athletes
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

No. They have inferior genetics compared to today's athletes
Racist
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10696 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:36 pm to
Translated for their respective eras to today? Not a chance.

But, for sake of debate, there's no reason to say that they wouldn't be a the top of today's game had they been born in a different era. If that makes sense.
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:39 pm to
Absolutely not. For one thing, an entire race of people were excluded in Ruth's day. For that matter, a couple of races were excluded. Strictly based on the fact that Ruth wasn't even playing against the best athletes of his OWN day, as far as I'm concerned, removes him from the conversation of could he compete against the best athletes 4 score years later.

Think Ruth would have put up big numbers against Mariano Rivera? Swatted home runs off of Fernando Valenzuela? Or would ol' Harold Grange do a bunch of ghostly galloping over Lawrence Taylor? Pffft. Guys like Taylor, Ronnie Lott, or Dirty 30 himself would sent him back to the sidelines in tears.

I've heard it said that Billy Cannon could have played in today's game. That he was as big, fast, and strong as the running backs of today. Having been born in a time that precluded me from seeing him play - and it's the same way with those mentioned in the thread title - I honestly can't give an opinion worth much. I will say though I'd find it hard to believe that ANY of the old legends would have been as good as they were had everyone been allowed to play. Not because I'm a race apologist though. It's because the basic laws of math say so.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36588 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Absolutely not. For one thing, an entire race of people were excluded in Ruth's day. For that matter, a couple of races were excluded. Strictly based on the fact that Ruth wasn't even playing against the best athletes of his OWN day, as far as I'm concerned, removes him from the conversation of could he compete against the best athletes 4 score years later.




Name 10 current black MLB players off the top of your head.
This post was edited on 6/10/15 at 5:50 pm
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59025 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:50 pm to
Negative bro
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29620 posts
Posted on 6/10/15 at 5:53 pm to
I don't watch baseball and could only think of three.

I thought he meant the Puerto Ricans.

Can you imagine the babe on HGH and pther PEDs.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram