Started By
Message

re: Whiplash is the best movie of the year...

Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:03 am to
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:03 am to
Just saw it tonight. Thought it was great, but I do take issue with the last scene. Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO. Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18989 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:46 am to
quote:

Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
Best actor is only for the lead. Teller was the lead not SImmons
Posted by JaxTiger10
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2014
3893 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:52 am to
The rest of the band knew the song. Andrew didnt.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15741 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:37 am to
quote:

Also Interstellar was the best film of the year.



Wow.

Whiplash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interstellar
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15741 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:40 am to
quote:

hought it was great, but I do take issue with the last scene. Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO


Rest of the band were professionals and knew the song. They could play it with Fletcher leading even with the drummer farting around.

quote:

Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.


He did win best supporting actor, which is what he was
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31667 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 5:10 am to
quote:

Interstellar was the best film of the year.





Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37483 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 9:49 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35251 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO. Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
Meh. Fletcher was already well-established and respected. I think the other musicians were pretty well-regarded as it was, but regardless, Fletcher is pretty egotistical and self-centered (not to care too much about the other's reputations).

I think Fletcher had it planned out well. If Andrew had continued to look that poorly throughout the rest of the set, Fletcher would have pointed out that the rest of the band played well, and Andrew was the outlier; Andrew is that much more isolated. He would have been the single flaw--and a astoundingly glaring flaw at that--in an otherwise flawless performance. Fletcher and the rest of the band would maintain their reputation, and Andrew would be remembered as the pariah that ruined perfection.

Andrew wouldn't have looked like a small fish in a big pond, he would have looked like a fish that didn't belong in any jazz pond.
This post was edited on 3/8/15 at 10:00 am
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 11:05 am to
Yeah, that's not how it works. Dude was a complete ego maniac. Not even bringing that kid down would be worth frickimg up that whole show for himself and the other musicians. It doesn't really matter if everyone plays great besides the drummer, had his plan worked, it would have been a disaster and embarrassment for them all on the biggest stage, and he would have been blackballed by the entire music community.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35251 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

had his plan worked, it would have been a disaster and embarrassment for them all on the biggest stage, and he would have been blackballed by the entire music community
Why though? Fletcher wasn't there to prove himself; he was invited because he was already well-respected and well-known in the Jazz community. I think everybody would have put the blame on the one person that screwed up.

I mean if Nick Saban or Urban Meyer was asked to coach a team for one game, and one player just absolutely bombed (e.g., forgetting plays, looks completely lost), but everybody else played well; however, that player cost them the game. Do you think they would blackball them from coaching, or put the blame on that one player?
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31667 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:59 pm to
It's called film man. Suspend belief for a few hours
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

It's called film man. Suspend belief for a few hours


This. Besides, his actions were in every way consistent with his character.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:23 pm to
Haha, I know. I loved the film.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:26 pm to
If the player that bombed in the football game came out after the game and told everyone that Saban called a bunch of plays that he had never practiced on purpose to make him look bad, yeah Saban would look like a total idiot, and no one would ever want to play for him again. Good analogy.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

best movie of the year



Nightcrawler.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35251 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

If the player that bombed in the football game came out after the game and told everyone that Saban called a bunch of plays that he had never practiced on purpose to make him look bad, yeah Saban would look like a total idiot, and no one would ever want to play for him again. Good analogy.
Who would they believe though; the one with an established reputation (e.g., Saban or Meyer) or the random unknown player that was the only one to bomb?

In addition, Andrew had attacked Fletcher, which would be publicly known, while Andrew's testimony would not be publicly known. Therefore, the publicly available information about their relationship--which we know would have been an inaccurate portrayal--would make it seem that Andrew was the unstable one with an ax to grind with Fletcher. Fletcher was invited to direct despite his removal from the school; his reputation was already established. It's easier to dismiss an unknown entity, who may only known for his incident of attacking Fletcher, who had the only poor performance than the known entity, who had a solid reputation.
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4170 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 7:11 pm to
Here ya go,

If Fletcher thought that the kid would really quit and walk off the stage for good, why was a backup drummer not there. (or was there?)
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

If Fletcher thought that the kid would really quit and walk off the stage for good, why was a backup drummer not there. (or was there?)

Fletcher's whole schtick was "YOU will not make me look bad!" It was completely out of character for him to pull that stunt. He had recently been fired from the conservatory. His reputation was good enough to get him that gig, but was not unquestionable at all.
Posted by Indigold
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2013
1703 posts
Posted on 3/21/15 at 8:37 am to
Watched this finally last night. Absolutely loved it. A lot of people have talked about the final scene and was he sabotaging him yada yada.

To me, the entire movie was his cymbal throw. Especially when they are talking in the jazz club. He tells Andrew that he was trying to make the next Charlie Parker, but that the truth was, he never had one. That's the worst thing Andrew could've heard, because that's what he wanted to be.

So he invites him to play with his band, knowing Andrew got him fired, planning out the finale of his cymbal throw. He fricks him over with Upswingin', you know the rest.

The point to Fletcher was that he tried. If he gets discouraged and leaves, like others have said, Neiman looks like a fool and will probably never play again. But if it works, he'll play the best f**king drum solo the world has ever heard.
Posted by Indigold
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2013
1703 posts
Posted on 3/21/15 at 9:08 am to
Also, did anyone else think that at some point in the movie, Fletcher would reveal that he took the music folder at the first performance? I was still wondering about that the rest of the movie..
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram