- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Whiplash is the best movie of the year...
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:03 am to CocomoLSU
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:03 am to CocomoLSU
Just saw it tonight. Thought it was great, but I do take issue with the last scene. Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO. Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:46 am to JuiceTerry
quote:Best actor is only for the lead. Teller was the lead not SImmons
Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:52 am to JuiceTerry
The rest of the band knew the song. Andrew didnt.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:37 am to Othello
quote:
Also Interstellar was the best film of the year.
Wow.
Whiplash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interstellar
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:40 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
hought it was great, but I do take issue with the last scene. Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO
Rest of the band were professionals and knew the song. They could play it with Fletcher leading even with the drummer farting around.
quote:
Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
He did win best supporting actor, which is what he was
Posted on 3/8/15 at 5:10 am to Othello
quote:
Interstellar was the best film of the year.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 9:59 am to JuiceTerry
quote:Meh. Fletcher was already well-established and respected. I think the other musicians were pretty well-regarded as it was, but regardless, Fletcher is pretty egotistical and self-centered (not to care too much about the other's reputations).
Doing what Fletcher did would have not only sabotaged the kid, but every other musician on that stage, himself included. It was not a believable action for him to take, IMO. Simmons was great, though, and should have won Best Actor.
I think Fletcher had it planned out well. If Andrew had continued to look that poorly throughout the rest of the set, Fletcher would have pointed out that the rest of the band played well, and Andrew was the outlier; Andrew is that much more isolated. He would have been the single flaw--and a astoundingly glaring flaw at that--in an otherwise flawless performance. Fletcher and the rest of the band would maintain their reputation, and Andrew would be remembered as the pariah that ruined perfection.
Andrew wouldn't have looked like a small fish in a big pond, he would have looked like a fish that didn't belong in any jazz pond.
This post was edited on 3/8/15 at 10:00 am
Posted on 3/8/15 at 11:05 am to Cockopotamus
Yeah, that's not how it works. Dude was a complete ego maniac. Not even bringing that kid down would be worth frickimg up that whole show for himself and the other musicians. It doesn't really matter if everyone plays great besides the drummer, had his plan worked, it would have been a disaster and embarrassment for them all on the biggest stage, and he would have been blackballed by the entire music community.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:38 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:Why though? Fletcher wasn't there to prove himself; he was invited because he was already well-respected and well-known in the Jazz community. I think everybody would have put the blame on the one person that screwed up.
had his plan worked, it would have been a disaster and embarrassment for them all on the biggest stage, and he would have been blackballed by the entire music community
I mean if Nick Saban or Urban Meyer was asked to coach a team for one game, and one player just absolutely bombed (e.g., forgetting plays, looks completely lost), but everybody else played well; however, that player cost them the game. Do you think they would blackball them from coaching, or put the blame on that one player?
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:59 pm to JuiceTerry
It's called film man. Suspend belief for a few hours
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:17 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
It's called film man. Suspend belief for a few hours
This. Besides, his actions were in every way consistent with his character.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:23 pm to WicKed WayZ
Haha, I know. I loved the film.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:26 pm to buckeye_vol
If the player that bombed in the football game came out after the game and told everyone that Saban called a bunch of plays that he had never practiced on purpose to make him look bad, yeah Saban would look like a total idiot, and no one would ever want to play for him again. Good analogy.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:39 pm to devils1854
quote:
best movie of the year
Nightcrawler.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 6:39 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:Who would they believe though; the one with an established reputation (e.g., Saban or Meyer) or the random unknown player that was the only one to bomb?
If the player that bombed in the football game came out after the game and told everyone that Saban called a bunch of plays that he had never practiced on purpose to make him look bad, yeah Saban would look like a total idiot, and no one would ever want to play for him again. Good analogy.
In addition, Andrew had attacked Fletcher, which would be publicly known, while Andrew's testimony would not be publicly known. Therefore, the publicly available information about their relationship--which we know would have been an inaccurate portrayal--would make it seem that Andrew was the unstable one with an ax to grind with Fletcher. Fletcher was invited to direct despite his removal from the school; his reputation was already established. It's easier to dismiss an unknown entity, who may only known for his incident of attacking Fletcher, who had the only poor performance than the known entity, who had a solid reputation.
Posted on 3/8/15 at 7:11 pm to buckeye_vol
Here ya go,
If Fletcher thought that the kid would really quit and walk off the stage for good, why was a backup drummer not there. (or was there?)
If Fletcher thought that the kid would really quit and walk off the stage for good, why was a backup drummer not there. (or was there?)
Posted on 3/9/15 at 6:58 pm to ScottFowler
quote:Fletcher's whole schtick was "YOU will not make me look bad!" It was completely out of character for him to pull that stunt. He had recently been fired from the conservatory. His reputation was good enough to get him that gig, but was not unquestionable at all.
If Fletcher thought that the kid would really quit and walk off the stage for good, why was a backup drummer not there. (or was there?)
Posted on 3/21/15 at 8:37 am to JuiceTerry
Watched this finally last night. Absolutely loved it. A lot of people have talked about the final scene and was he sabotaging him yada yada.
To me, the entire movie was his cymbal throw. Especially when they are talking in the jazz club. He tells Andrew that he was trying to make the next Charlie Parker, but that the truth was, he never had one. That's the worst thing Andrew could've heard, because that's what he wanted to be.
So he invites him to play with his band, knowing Andrew got him fired, planning out the finale of his cymbal throw. He fricks him over with Upswingin', you know the rest.
The point to Fletcher was that he tried. If he gets discouraged and leaves, like others have said, Neiman looks like a fool and will probably never play again. But if it works, he'll play the best f**king drum solo the world has ever heard.
To me, the entire movie was his cymbal throw. Especially when they are talking in the jazz club. He tells Andrew that he was trying to make the next Charlie Parker, but that the truth was, he never had one. That's the worst thing Andrew could've heard, because that's what he wanted to be.
So he invites him to play with his band, knowing Andrew got him fired, planning out the finale of his cymbal throw. He fricks him over with Upswingin', you know the rest.
The point to Fletcher was that he tried. If he gets discouraged and leaves, like others have said, Neiman looks like a fool and will probably never play again. But if it works, he'll play the best f**king drum solo the world has ever heard.
Posted on 3/21/15 at 9:08 am to Indigold
Also, did anyone else think that at some point in the movie, Fletcher would reveal that he took the music folder at the first performance? I was still wondering about that the rest of the movie..
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News