Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/11/15 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46631 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 7:58 pm to
You talk a lot of shite for a Saints fan
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73775 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

You talk a lot of shite for a Saints fan



I have gotten at least 10 text messages from Saints fans talking shite now that Dallas is out.

Posted by Texas_Boss
Central Texas
Member since Sep 2014
133 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:04 pm to
All I know is that it couldn't happen to a more deserving team or individual. Frick the Cowboys, karma fool!
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
34922 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:05 pm to
I'm a Saints fan moron
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 8:17 pm
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9154 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:09 pm to
How many of those calls do they really get right in the course of a game with no challenges? Probably not many.
Posted by Buck Magnum
Springdale
Member since Dec 2003
11659 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:12 pm to
Yes
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29364 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:12 pm to

Yes, it was a catch.
Posted by Chillini
Member since Sep 2012
3153 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:19 pm to
Yes, it was a catch. Just like Calvin Johnson's in Chicago a few years back.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111719 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

ctiger69
Hey, why'd you abandon that awesome thread you started about the officials favoring the Cowboys?

Just curious.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18136 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

And he never stretched.


You are really going to argue that he did not look dead at the goal post and reach out for it? I guess, he also didn't catch the ball with his left shoulder facing the endzone and then twisted his body towards the endzone. Must be a parallel universe that took place in.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
6324 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:40 pm to
From beginning I thought the to the ground rule should be applied to the quick tap of feet going down or out of bounds and definitely when not landing on feet but other part like shoulder and side, but I don't think it should be applied when a player takes two strides or more after securing ball whether going down or being tackled

Still I think after his second foot touches he advances football 2 or 3 yards (almost 4 or 5 from controlling ball) including after 2nd foot down got tangled with defender a last little shove with his 3rd foot down towards goal and including his right hand to ground attempting to stay up long enough to get ball across goal line. His arm just quickly collapsed and right forearm hit ground at 1/2 yard line as he started to extend, and then left hand with ball hit ground a little closer to goal line.

quote:

...c) maintains control of the ball long enough, after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, to enable him to perform any act common to the game (i.e., maintaining control long enough to pitch it, pass it, advance with it, or avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.).

Note 1: It is not necessary that he commit such an act, provided that he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77431 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

How is there even a debate? Under NFL rules, it's not a catch. No grey area.


This
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46631 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:43 pm to
I like how this argument has slowly progressed from "He didn't maintain control through to the ground" to "He didn't make a football move" to now" Well, it only LOOKED like he made a football move but he really wasn't trying to".



The attempts to defend the call slowly grow more absurd as poor argument after poor argument is flushed out. Four hours ago, a football move didn't matter. Now that it clearly has been shown it does, we've just decided that trying to read Dez Bryant's mind is more appropriate than letting the call stand.

The kind of person capable of looking at that video and saying he wasn't trying to extend the ball for a TD simply cannot be reasoned with. They are capable of believing literally anything.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18136 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

The fanboys and contrarians are going to see what they want to see, despite clear evidence. I mean there are people saying the ball never touched the ground for a Christ's sake, there's no convincing someone like that


The same could be said for you. You have yet to provide actual evidence that doesn't require x-Ray vision. You clearly are just as biased as those you object to.
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11326 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:45 pm to
I loathe the Cowboys but that was a catch
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29752 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:45 pm to
YES
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29364 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

I loathe the Cowboys but that was a catch



Ditto.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77431 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:49 pm to
This is a mind melt....there is no reality where that was a catch under the written rule
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82438 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:51 pm to
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18136 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

And the dive you keep alluding to didnt happen. He was falling down.



He dove when he pushed off with his left foot but that's beside the point the rule states that reaching out is considered a football move rendering it a catch. More so though the call on the field was a catch and no view shows visible evidence of the ball contacting the ground. Therefore, either the play stands or he didn't complete the catch until he was on his back in the endzone so it could have been ruled a touchdown though unlikely that would have been called.
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29 30 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram