- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Chavis thoughts on LSU offense
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:13 pm
34
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:15 pm to texasaggie08
He should have been more concerned with Auburn's offense.
What a goof.
Check back in a year.
What a goof.
Check back in a year.
This post was edited on 1/4/15 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:16 pm to texasaggie08
Jennings made him quit. 
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:16 pm to texasaggie08
Well, that is interesting on a number of levels.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:17 pm to texasaggie08
what was the fat frick's excuse last season?
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:17 pm to texasaggie08
Whatever Chief. Your defense failed so many times when that shifty offense gave you the lead with under 2 minutes to play. 
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:17 pm to texasaggie08
I can understand the frustration.
At the same time, his defenses won't be near as good at ATM for 2 reasons. Lack of front 7 talent in Texas on an annual basis (lots of soft defenders in the state), and ATM's offense will keep his D on the field the same amount and probably more than it was at LSU.
At the same time, his defenses won't be near as good at ATM for 2 reasons. Lack of front 7 talent in Texas on an annual basis (lots of soft defenders in the state), and ATM's offense will keep his D on the field the same amount and probably more than it was at LSU.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:18 pm to texasaggie08
Can't really blame him if true. But he had his fair share of frick-ups. I think he allowed about 10 game winning drives.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:18 pm to texasaggie08
TBH I don't blame him being irritated. I would
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:18 pm to BilJ
Excuse for what?
How many championships would CLM if the O kept pace with the D?
How many championships would CLM if the O kept pace with the D?
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:18 pm to texasaggie08
What a retard.
He blows it with a fantastic offense in 2013, then goes to a team that he shut down and beat 4 times?
He's full of shite.
He blows it with a fantastic offense in 2013, then goes to a team that he shut down and beat 4 times?
He's full of shite.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:20 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
and ATM's offense will keep his D on the field the same amount and probably more than it was at LSU.
LSU was top 10 in time of possession. A&M was 125
This post was edited on 1/4/15 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:22 pm to Choctaw
My point exactly. LSU could control the ball. With ATM, there will be scoring, but lots of quick series as well.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:24 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Lack of front 7 talent in Texas on an annual basis (lots of soft defenders in the state)
here's the big issue, A&M fans are tickled pink with this hire...but man this could be a disaster of a marriage.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:25 pm to texasaggie08
Well if that article is indeed somewhat true, then some of us posters on here and I will include myself need to STFU about the Miles clause, Money matters and say Alleva caoused Chavis to leave. Obviously according to that article if any semblance of truth puts it squarely on the offense and seems to make sense based upon what he said to the Houston reporters once landing over there.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:25 pm to gatordmb89
This reminds me of when Muschamp was introduced at AU. He said something like "I'm proud to be at a place that can compete for Championships". I was thinking "you controlled your own destiny at UF and failed, that's YOUR fault."
Chavis' defenses were good at LSU, but he was handed a ton of talent as well.
Chavis' defenses were good at LSU, but he was handed a ton of talent as well.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:28 pm to gatordmb89
And we will continue to possess the ball and run all over A&M. With the talent he had here we gave up close to 150 rushing yards a game.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:29 pm to texasaggie08
While I can understand his frustration but at least he was at a place that had the talent to make him look good.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:29 pm to texasaggie08
BOOM no surprises there. chavis is as loyal as they come. he was sick of miles and his archaic 70's offense and lack of a QB.
Posted on 1/4/15 at 10:30 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
This reminds me of when Muschamp was introduced at AU. He said something like "I'm proud to be at a place that can compete for Championships". I was thinking "you controlled your own destiny at UF and failed, that's YOUR fault." Chavis' defenses were good at LSU, but he was handed a ton of talent as well.
Muschamp's comments weren't a shot at UF. He was asked why he didn't take a lower tier HC job (like Houston which he was rumored for). He'd rather be a DC at An SEC school than a HC at a bottom feeder
The only shot at Florida he took was the comment about the housing
This post was edited on 1/4/15 at 10:31 pm
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News