- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rolling Stones or Beatles?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:26 pm to Tigertown in ATL
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:26 pm to Tigertown in ATL
Stones all day.....and it's not even close
1
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:34 pm to Tigertown in ATL
Half of the beatles music is terrible from the first half the 60s. Most overrated band of all time.
The rolling stones are the real deal.
The rolling stones are the real deal.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:35 pm to Blue Velvet
Beatles and it ain't even close
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:41 pm to Tigertown in ATL
Beatles
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:42 pm to Burt Reynolds
do these two bands get played at parties though?
that's all i want to know
that's all i want to know
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:44 pm to monsterballads
I used to crank the frick out of "Can't you hear me knocking" at my house parties.
Point, Stones
Point, Stones
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:44 pm to monsterballads
quote:
do these two bands get played at parties though?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:53 pm to monsterballads
quote:
do these two bands get played at parties though?
do you even twist and shout?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:55 pm to LSUTygerFan
BREAUX, no one plays the Beatles at parties...It just doesn't happen
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:56 pm to monsterballads
Rolling stones is played at parties. The beatles arent.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 3:59 pm to Spaulding Smails
quote:That's like the second line of the MB Deceleration of Independence right after WSP SUX
no one plays the Beatles at parties
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:01 pm to monsterballads
quote:
do these two bands get played at parties though? that's all i want to know
Nothing gets a party shaking like "Yellow Submarine" and "Rocky Raccoon".
Stones all day, every day!
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:05 pm to danman6336
quote:
MB Deceleration of Independence
Can someone actually write this up...I think that would probably be hysterical
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:06 pm to EA6B
Yeah I mean the Stones have some cringe worthy songs too, but the Beatles have more laughably horrible ones.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:08 pm to Melvin
The Stones came out with a really shitty album while at the height of thier powers with Their Satanic Majesties Request, which was really just a lame attempt to copy the Beatles
The Beatles never released a bad album, except Let it Be, but that was Phil Spector's fault, not the Beatles
Beatles > Stones
The Beatles never released a bad album, except Let it Be, but that was Phil Spector's fault, not the Beatles
Beatles > Stones
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:10 pm to CaptainPanic
quote:The Beatles were notorious for their live shows dating back to Hamburg and the Cavern Club. Playing for live audiences became a problem for them due to crowd noise. Their rooftop concert is evidence enough for me to conclude they still knew how to play for an audience.
I'd pick a Rolling Stones concert over a Beatles concert any day at any point of their careers. Live music = good music
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:11 pm to danman6336
quote:
Stones > Beatles
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:12 pm to Blue Velvet
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:16 pm to Burt Reynolds
It depends on what you want from a band. I want hard-drivin' rock n roll, so the Stones.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 4:18 pm to Burt Reynolds
Bro, do you even math?
90% of the Stones songs are awesome
40% of the Beatles songs are listenable
/thread
90% of the Stones songs are awesome
40% of the Beatles songs are listenable
/thread
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News