- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Quidditch is the worst sport, fictional or real, that has ever been thought up.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:41 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:41 am
Ok, so I'm rereading the Harry Potter books because the last time I read them, I was 9. Overall, they hold up pretty well except for Harry is a fricking selfish tool half the time and it takes a certain suspension of disbelief the way certain stories play out, but that's a conversation for another day.
Quidditch is HORRIBLE sport. The 10 points per goal vs 150 for snitch differential ruins it. It makes it almost certain that whoever gets the snitch will win the game. It makes 6/7 players pretty much useless during most games. So that means, the only way that a team could win the game if they don't have the snitch is for them to absolutely dominate the other team, and therefore not an entertaining game to watch or the game takes forever, which isn't a good thing either.
Quidditch is HORRIBLE sport. The 10 points per goal vs 150 for snitch differential ruins it. It makes it almost certain that whoever gets the snitch will win the game. It makes 6/7 players pretty much useless during most games. So that means, the only way that a team could win the game if they don't have the snitch is for them to absolutely dominate the other team, and therefore not an entertaining game to watch or the game takes forever, which isn't a good thing either.
12
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:43 am to athenslife101
quote:
It makes 6/7 players pretty much useless during most games. So that means, the only way that a team could win the game if they don't have the snitch is for them to absolutely dominate the other team, and therefore not an entertaining game to watch or the game takes forever, which isn't a good thing either.
I think what was poorly communicated was that HP was supposed to be like a once in a generation Seeker. Apparently, in other games, most games even, the Snitch is never caught. Rowling could not help her self and had Harry catching snitches left and right.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 8:44 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:44 am to athenslife101
There has to be some way to make Harry the clear cause for winning a game and they don't have quarterbacks to use for the role.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:44 am to athenslife101
So it's kind of like Family Feud when the point values triple and the first few rounds don't matter, unless you dominate them all.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:47 am to athenslife101
Bulgaria catches the snitch in the Quidditch World Cup and still loses so....... I don't see the point of your rant.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:51 am to Hester Carries
quote:
Apparently, in other games, most games even, the Snitch is never caught.
I'm pretty sure that the game never ends until the snitch is caught. So the snitch has to be caught every game.
It was just a very poorly thought out game, and it's pretty fricking stupid.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:55 am to jackwoods4
Most games, the winner of the snitch wins. They say that in the first book. And if you catch the snitch and lose, it's a bad game. That means you're down by over 150 points at that moment that you caught it. That's a blowout and not a good game to be watching unless your a fan of the team doing the blowout.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:59 am to Hester Carries
quote:
I think what was poorly communicated was that HP was supposed to be like a once in a generation Seeker. Apparently, in other games, most games even, the Snitch is never caught. Rowling could not help her self and had Harry catching snitches left and right.
Not true. The game doesn't end until the snitch is caught.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:59 am to Peazey
quote:
I'm pretty sure that the game never ends until the snitch is caught. So the snitch has to be caught every game.
It was just a very poorly thought out game, and it's pretty fricking stupid.
pretty sure that aint right.
ETA: well i guess im wrong. In my defense, Quidditch scenes were given very little of my attention whilst reading.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:01 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 8:59 am to athenslife101
We haven't seen sudden death Quidditch since the Helsinki Episode of 1912, and i think we all remember how that turned out
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:01 am to fleaux
quote:
Helsinki Episode of 1912
1919, but yeah, a real barn-burner. Instant classic.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:04 am to athenslife101
the triwizard tournament is pretty dumb too. Have a huge distraction from school while these young kids might get to see a few of their classmates die? What could go wrong?
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:05 am to Hester Carries
quote:
1919, but yeah, a real barn-burner. Instant classic.
Haha i figured i got the year wrong, but all in all the best dodgeball match ever
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:08 am to fleaux
quote:
Haha i figured i got the year wrong, but all in all the best dodgeball match ever
have you ever actually read what the Helinski Incident really was? Crazy. And such a stupid, random reference. Love it.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:10 am to athenslife101
quote:
it takes a certain suspension of disbelief the way certain stories play out
I would love for you to explain where exactly a series about wizards crosses the disbelief line.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:13 am to Hester Carries
quote:
have you ever actually read what the Helinski Incident really was? Crazy. And such a stupid, random reference. Love it.
Just read it, that's insane! I figured it was a made up name for an old dodgeball match
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:18 am to magildachunks
quote:
I would love for you to explain where exactly a series about wizards crosses the disbelief line.
The line is crossed at the point where things don't make sense within the world that was built.
And there are a lot of those points in the Harry Potter series.
Their whole economy and caste system makes little to no sense at all. How could the Weasleys be poor if you can just magik up whatever you want? How does an economy survive when they only people that don't work for the government are bartenders and novelty store owners?
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:23 am to fleaux
Per google, there is no "Helsinki Incident of 1919." 
Also, of course the sport is weird and makes little sense...it was made up by a woman. Amirite?
Also, of course the sport is weird and makes little sense...it was made up by a woman. Amirite?
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:24 am to magildachunks
Everything's relative. In the world of the books, wizards exist. Nothing unbelievable about that. When things start happening counter to the logic of the built world, I find that unbelievable.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:28 am to ProjectP2294
quote:Because fricking magic, that's why.
Their whole economy and caste system makes little to no sense at all. How could the Weasleys be poor if you can just magik up whatever you want? How does an economy survive when they only people that don't work for the government are bartenders and novelty store owners?
Always trying to ruin fantasy stories. Next you are gonna tell me that Dottie didn't drop it on ourpose even though it's a fricking fantasy movie.
Women playing baseball. Yea, when pigs fly.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News