- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Georgia Governor signs "unprecedented" Gun Rights bill
Posted on 4/23/14 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 4/23/14 at 5:42 pm
quote:
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal (R) signed a sweeping gun rights bill on Wednesday.
House Bill 60, also known as The Safe Carry Protection Act, will allow licensed gun owners to carry their firearms into public places, including bars, nightclubs, schools, churches and government buildings.
LINK
Posted on 4/23/14 at 5:45 pm to deltaland
Looks like someone understands that
Gun free zone = killing zone
Gun free zone = killing zone
Posted on 4/23/14 at 5:45 pm to deltaland
I know the NRA is happy. Go Georgia
Posted on 4/23/14 at 5:47 pm to deltaland
quote:
bars, nightclubs
Won't cause any issues
Posted on 4/23/14 at 6:52 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Won't cause any issues
sigh...this is why we should abort the stupid. Private businesses can set whatever rules they like.
keep trying.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 7:03 pm to deltaland
I'm okay with what I've heard about the law except for not having to show your permit if requested.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 7:26 pm to deltaland
They're already preparing for me to move there in June.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 7:43 pm to deltaland
I don't see an issue with this.
The right to own and carry a gun should be protected and expanded.
The issue with "gun rights" activists is not that. It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection.
The right to own and carry a gun should be protected and expanded.
The issue with "gun rights" activists is not that. It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:02 pm to drizztiger
quote:
It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection.
And why shouldn't they?
Why shouldn't a law abiding citizen be allowed to own the same arms as the police force?
inb4 atomic bomb strawman
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:12 pm to drizztiger
quote:They should.
The issue with "gun rights" activists is not that. It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:22 pm to drizztiger
quote:
It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection.
Research "in common use" as it relates to firearms, specifically the case United States v. Miller.
As "assault rifles" are consistently the top selling type of rifle year after year, I'd say they're "in common use."
This post was edited on 4/23/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:42 pm to deltaland
Guns in bars and nightclubs is an extremely bad idea.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:46 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Guns in bars and nightclubs is an extremely bad idea.
Has been legal in TN for quite some time. So what is the problem?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News