Started By
Message

re: Georgia Governor signs "unprecedented" Gun Rights bill

Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:16 pm to
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

We have to suppress their right to vote...you're losing your focus



I'm not suppressing anything. Look at it as freeing them of their undue burden to participate in the tiresome political process.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90606 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Look at it as freeing them of their undue burden to participate in the tiresome political process.


Ah yes, they will finally be free from "voter lock". They can now pursue their dreams of child bearing and cooking dinner without worrying about needing to vote and waste time researching candidates.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Ah yes, they will finally be free from "voter lock". They can now pursue their dreams of child bearing and cooking dinner without worrying about needing to vote and waste time researching candidates.




That's better. Politics is all about semantics.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108359 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:29 pm to
There's one thing that this bill is retarded about, and its the fact that a cop can't ask to see your license for the sole purpose that you have a concealed weapon. Seriously, what's to stop some crazy dude from walking into a mall with an obviously concealed handgun, and then shooting up the place? I hate the cops, but I think they should know if you have a permit to carry around a lethal weapon of that caliber.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108359 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Guns in bars and nightclubs is an extremely bad idea.


Has been legal in TN for quite some time. So what is the problem?


....Have you ever been drunk before? Do you know how drunk people think? They act before they think and don't give a frick. It is a horrible, horrible idea for a drunk person to carry around a gun.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67910 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

I have yet to hear an argument that would make me believe average joe citizen needs an assault rifle.


It's like insurance. You don't need it, until you need it.
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10111 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:34 pm to
Haven't read the law but is there a bac limit? You know, like there is now at restaurants and such?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108359 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to call you a name, but why shouldn't a law abiding citizen have a M-16?



Why the frick would a civilian need an M-16? Do they expect an invasion of their house from several dozen armed men?
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Why the frick would a civilian need an M-16? Do they expect an invasion of their house from several dozen armed men?



BLM is a perfect example of why the 2nd Amendment exists.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

I own a 9mm and a 12 gauge, fwiw. IMO, the issue with gun rights isn't taking guns away from law abiding citizens, it's the proliferation of unnecessary weapons.

My AR, "Phoebe," says "frick you."
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

rapid assault rifle
Credibility gone.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

The issue with "gun rights" activists is not that. It's their idea that assault rifles should carry the same type of protection
Why shouldn't they? They function exactly the same. They just look different.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67910 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Credibility gone.




Amen!

I have a black powder muzzle loader.

If I hit drizz over the head with it, would he call it an "assault rifle"?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

an obviously concealed handgun
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

it's the proliferation of unnecessary weapons.
Define "necessary".
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8108 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Why the frick would a civilian need an M-16? Do they expect an invasion of their house from several dozen armed men?



Civilians can't buy new M-16s. We can buy semi-auto rifles that look like an M-16.

Now we have to prove a need before legally purchasing something?

quote:

Do they expect an invasion of their house from several dozen armed men?


I know you're trying to be clever, but an AR-15 is a legitimate self-defense tool. Nobody has a problem with a cop carrying an AR, because after all, he/she may have to deal with dangerous armed criminals. Do civilians not have to deal with these same assholes? Is there a group of exceptionally dangerous criminals that only fricks with cops, but leaves civilians alone? My brother's home was invaded by 5 armed robbers, so lets not pretend like encountering multiple assailants can't happen.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

I have yet to hear an argument that would make me believe average joe citizen needs an assault rifle.
The 2A is part of the Bill of Rights. Not the Bill of Needs.

Does joe citizen NEED a printing press?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57234 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Why the frick would a civilian need an M-16?
Where does one go to buy an M-16?
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

I know you're trying to be clever, but an AR-15 is a legitimate self-defense tool. Nobody has a problem with a cop carrying an AR, because after all, he/she may have to deal with dangerous armed criminals. Do civilians not have to deal with these same assholes? Is there a group of exceptionally dangerous criminals that only fricks with cops, but leaves civilians alone? My brother's home was invaded by 5 armed robbers, so lets not pretend like encountering multiple assailants can't happen.


Well. There it is.

Copy and paste that shite.
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8108 posts
Posted on 4/23/14 at 11:10 pm to


Phoebe, huh? I wouldn't expect something that trendy from you, brah.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram