Started By
Message
locked post

Just watched "The Hunger Games" ---- wow

Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:32 am
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:32 am
What an abysmally stupid movie, and I'm guessing it's because the source material is stupid. Somebody please tell me there's a better story within the books than the crap that I just witnessed. No sense, whatsoever, of any social desperation or fear or hysteria or dementia that would allow such an event... no sense of history that would lead to such a point... no sense of outrage or protest, as one would expect, from at least a small segment of the population... a story with no sense, whatsoever.

I couldn't help but compare it to "The Running Man"... was it a ripoff thereof? Couldn't touch it... couldn't match the depravity of the audience or the genius of Richard Dawson... nor the exhilaration in the fights. Hell, even "The Truman Show" was miles better in depicting the character and motives and emotions of its live public audience.

"1984" this wasn't.

And maybe I missed something... it was only a small part of my dissatisfaction, anyway... but how is it that holograms can actually eat people?


Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66467 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:33 am to
2nd worse cinematography ever behind the 30 minutes I saw of Contraband
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:33 am to
Yeah it was pretty boring
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31973 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:37 am to
The book is much better. The first book is actually pretty good, parts of the second are too. Third one is terrible
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:37 am to
quote:

What an abysmally stupid movie, and I'm guessing it's because the source material is stupid. Somebody please tell me there's a better story within the books than the crap that I just witnessed. No sense, whatsoever, of any social desperation or fear or hysteria or dementia that would allow such an event... no sense of history that would lead to such a point... no sense of outrage or protest, as one would expect, from at least a small segment of the population... a story with no sense, whatsoever.



Yeah, the book actually explains all that. The movie is just completely rushed all the way through and removes some key elements. It was very disappointing to me.

This is a pretty spot on review of what is wrong with the movie: LINK
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:43 am to
The movie is a watered-down version of the book. It removed some of the novel's more violent and adult themes to secure a PG-13 rating.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33964 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 1:11 am to
A movie so shitty that even Jennifer Lawrence's acting couldn't save it.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11924 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 2:51 am to
quote:

I couldn't help but compare it to "The Running Man"

Same here. I didn't think Hunger Games was bad but I didn't read the books so I have no clue how true it is/was.
Posted by poncho villa
DALLAS
Member since Jul 2010
17732 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 2:53 am to
like someone else already said, the first two books are pretty good. The last one is probably one of the worst books in terms of trying to understand what the frick is going on.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64365 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:54 am to
Nah the books are horrendously written. I actually thought the movie was significantly better.
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10512 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:56 am to
It was a dumb plot to begin with. If the movie was that bad I don't see how a book could make it better.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78062 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:59 am to
Is Hunger Games the new cool movie to hate on now?
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22211 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 8:23 am to
Yeah, I thought you were going to be a good wow and now I am happy. It did suck and I hated the shaky arse camera work. Almost made me
Posted by ArtooDetoo
Tatooine
Member since Feb 2013
179 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 8:45 am to
Of course you hated Hunger Games...it was aimed at pre-teens, not dirty old hippies wearing dog costumes.

These movies/books are marketed to kids, if you're a 40 year old professional then it likely won't appeal to you. That is like reading a Dr. Seuss book and saying, "wow! That can't even touch the genius of Charles Dickens. What a load of shite!" If you learn to tailor your expectations to a more reasonable standard, you won't go through life so miserable all the time. For example, when you start a thread, I know it is going to absolutely suck...thus, I don't expect much and am never disappointed.

That being said, I can see how kids would dig Hunger Games. Violence, sparkly things, awkward sexual tension etc. I thought it was ok, didn't blow my mind but didn't make me regret seeing it. Oh and Jennifer Lawrence was
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Just watched "The Hunger Games" ---- wow


It was bad but then it was pretty much what I expected from B movie material. Jennifer Lawrence makes it worth one watch.
Posted by Wooly
Member since Feb 2012
13851 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 9:14 am to


she looks better as a brunette.... thats why i stuck with it
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 9:30 am to
the book is better, but it still isn't very well written
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12268 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 9:48 am to
I thought it blew Battle Royale out of the fricking water. That movie sucked arse. Yeah, I said it.

Though the casting of Peeta was fricking abysmal. The "strong man" can't be smaller than the leading lady. That's just dumb.
This post was edited on 3/18/13 at 9:50 am
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13616 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 11:27 am to
quote:

What an abysmally stupid movie, and I'm guessing it's because the source material is stupid.


I read all 3 books just to tell people they were fricking idiots when they claimed the books were great. The writing, storyline, character development, and pretty much everything else that makes a good story were fricking terrible. For fantasy, it is terrible. For sci-fi it was fricking terrible. As a children's book, it is abyssmal with absolutely zero good messages for young adults. Also, it was a complete rip-off of "the running man," "the most dangerous game," and "the lottery."
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36634 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:00 pm to
I never read the books, but the 1st movie kinda turned me off on giving it a chance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram