- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NCAA Football 13
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:13 am to hg
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:13 am to hg
quote:I wish they just left recruiting for the offseason.
Recruiting still takes way to fricking long. I'm fine with it the first year in dynasty but the years after I dread it and can't wait to just play a game.
Recruiting in dynasty is a drag.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:15 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:No doubt.
They need to either completely redo the RTG or just get rid of it.
If you are a defensive player, CPU calls the play and runs/passes away from you.
If you are a QB/WR, you get nothing but running plays called. . .opposite for RB's.
shite's embarrassing. . .and it has been that way since RTG was created.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:28 am to Roaad
Jae would frick your shite up at this game
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:45 am to Roaad
They need to add in All-American showcase games for recruiting too. Kids and move up or down a star depending on how they do their senior year, etc. The #1 recruit shouldn't be a WR or HB every single damn year.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 12:59 am to sbr2
Most major problems could be fixed if they used an engine that could apply realistic physics to all elements of the game. 9.8 m/s^2 to LB, WR would eliminate rocket catches and linebacker rocket packs. It would also make height/weight relevant. Collision detection with a force multiplier (F=MA) would give power runners vs agile runners a better feel. Football would travel realistically. Etc,etc, etc.
This post was edited on 2/13/12 at 1:17 am
Posted on 2/13/12 at 1:01 am to Rick Rickles
I totally agree man, but that is a huge change. Hopefully we get that with the next-gen jump, but I doubt that.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 2:10 am to Rick Rickles
quote:
Most major problems could be fixed if they used an engine that could apply realistic physics to all elements of the game.
Last EA game I bought was 5 years ago, and I've pledged never to buy their shite again until they install something similar to this.
Until people stop throwing $60 at EA every year for a game that's 95% like the one from a year ago, I don't expect to see this change any time soon.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 2:15 am to Roaad
quote:
Nobody else does, because you keep paying for this shite.
This smacks of some high horseness.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 3:21 am to HornsTiger07
They need to make the whole coaching carousel process more meaningful. Maybe add salaries in the game? Where you can make more based on your prestige level and the schools. (Like you can make more as an offensive coordinator at lsu than head coach at say arkansas state).
Then also change jobs in the middle of a contract. Which would effect your recruting poorly and also youd have to use your money to buy out of current.
Maybe something like that, just anything to make the coaching carousel or changing process bigger.
Then also change jobs in the middle of a contract. Which would effect your recruting poorly and also youd have to use your money to buy out of current.
Maybe something like that, just anything to make the coaching carousel or changing process bigger.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 6:23 am to Indfanfromcol
Program the CPU to call plays based on down and distance rather then what I have 2 RBs rated 93 and 91 in my dynasty. I am a power running team. On first and ten I call an I-Form Tight with 1 WR - it was play action pass. Guess what the CPU called? A fricking cover 3. I mean come on, give me a damn break
LBs that don't jump 50 feet in the air
DL who are better at intercepting passes than anyone in the secondary
Recruiting that isn't a pain in the arse - why does the CPU recruit like shite? I just came off a national championship with LSU and I figured the CPU would do a good job since I just won it - nope I had the 25th ranked class with like 4 4* players.
LBs that don't jump 50 feet in the air
DL who are better at intercepting passes than anyone in the secondary
Recruiting that isn't a pain in the arse - why does the CPU recruit like shite? I just came off a national championship with LSU and I figured the CPU would do a good job since I just won it - nope I had the 25th ranked class with like 4 4* players.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 6:34 am to Roaad
quote:exactly how am I being a little bitch?
Quit being a little bitch.
quote:do good in practice and you can call your own plays...AMIRITE
If you are a defensive player, CPU calls the play and runs/passes away from you. If you are a QB/WR, you get nothing but running plays called. . .opposite for RB's. shite's embarrassing. . .and it has been that way since RTG was created.
This post was edited on 2/13/12 at 6:36 am
Posted on 2/13/12 at 6:34 am to Rick Rickles
I'm pretty sure they have gravity involved in the game, just like I'm pretty sure they have force vectors.
The code isn't bad, the problem is its written on a really, really shitty base. I was playing some Madden on my Gamecube the other day, and yes its not very realistic, but my god it was smooth. No rocket catches, no linebackers knocking everything down, a deep ball looked like a real deep ball. Ray Lewis had terrible face on him, but I'm willing to give that up for the base.
The code isn't bad, the problem is its written on a really, really shitty base. I was playing some Madden on my Gamecube the other day, and yes its not very realistic, but my god it was smooth. No rocket catches, no linebackers knocking everything down, a deep ball looked like a real deep ball. Ray Lewis had terrible face on him, but I'm willing to give that up for the base.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 6:38 am to Chimlim
CPU play calling Feds needs to be fixed. That shite has been broken for YEARS. They always know what play you picked
Posted on 2/13/12 at 7:08 am to JAE20
quote:insinuating that I demand a perfect product.
exactly how am I being a little bitch?
I don't expect NCAA to be perfect. I just expect the franchise to fix problems that already plague it, rather than add 7,678,657,654 new celebrations and pregame shite.
quote:You can call offensive plays on defense?
do good in practice and you can call your own plays...AMIRITE
As far as offense, you are correct. But that actually takes away from the realism. I want the coaches to call plays, just call plays that feature the player. . .especially if the player is an AA.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 7:09 am to Roaad
quote:Well, that narrows it down to every football player out there.
especially if the player is an AA.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 7:25 am to Roaad
I don't play Witt defensive players in rtg bit I'm sure it works the same play. RTG is just a snippet of the entire game which was a revamped this year, give them a break.
IMO its far from being terrible, and will only get better in 13'
EA sets budgets and time for each portion of the game. Almost positive the order of priority is
1. Gameplay
2. Dynasty
3. Rtg
As far as what your asking for in RTG; it's a valid argument but that would require them to write in a new play call selection algorithm and then have it THOROUGHLY tested. That would either require them to pull allocated time from another area or increase budget. 12's RTG is a lot better the 10,11, and 12's.
Sorry for sloppiness im walking to class and typing on my iPhone
IMO its far from being terrible, and will only get better in 13'
EA sets budgets and time for each portion of the game. Almost positive the order of priority is
1. Gameplay
2. Dynasty
3. Rtg
As far as what your asking for in RTG; it's a valid argument but that would require them to write in a new play call selection algorithm and then have it THOROUGHLY tested. That would either require them to pull allocated time from another area or increase budget. 12's RTG is a lot better the 10,11, and 12's.
Sorry for sloppiness im walking to class and typing on my iPhone
Posted on 2/13/12 at 8:14 am to Roaad
You actually sound like the bitch in here. It's not a terrible game, they changed more from 11 to 12 than the usual cod games do. Instead of bitchinghere, why don't you go tell EA your perfect game so they can make it for you. Or go work for them even.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 8:48 am to JAE20
quote:I will repeat.
IMO its far from being terrible, and will only get better in 13'
What is terrible is the fact that the same problems in 2013, will be the same things I was complaining about in 2008.
I used to defend it, as well. They fix things that aren't broken, and ignore things that fans have complained about for years.
quote:Actually, I'd say the priority is:
EA sets budgets and time for each portion of the game. Almost positive the order of priority is
1. Gameplay
2. Dynasty
3. Rtg
1) Graphics
2) Pregame stuff
3) TD celebrations
4) Online gameplay
5) Mascot mash-up
6) Offline Gameplay
7) Minigames
8) Team Creator
9) Cover Art
10) Dynasty Mode
11) Stickers on Packaging
12) Counting your Money
13) Tipping the Waitress
14) RTG
quote:Yeah, sounds like asking them to do their job.
it's a valid argument but that would require them to write in a new play call selection algorithm and then have it THOROUGHLY tested.
quote:It is exactly the same, with a coach's trust feature. That was a clever way to completely avoid fixing the logic.
12's RTG is a lot better the 10,11, and 12's.
I felt insulted.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 8:53 am to FleurDeLonestar
quote:You understand that everything I have brought up, has been brought up to EA for the last 5 years. . .and some much longer than that.
why don't you go tell EA your perfect game so they can make it for you.
They aren't listening, so I am talking to them with my wallet. It's the only language they seem to understand.
quote:They did what they usually do. Improved shite that wasn't broken, and prettied it up. Nothing is fixed.
It's not a terrible game
Would you keep paying for food from a restaurant if it was undercooked every time you ordered it?
quote:You are bitching about my criticism, so there you go.
You actually sound like the bitch in here.
quote:If my food is undercooked, must I become a chef to complain about it?
Or go work for them even.
Posted on 2/13/12 at 8:59 am to Roaad
You have really only stressed two things. The graphics aspect, and RTG. If you don't like RTG, don't play it. Not a hard concept. In this day and age, graphics sell. Of course they are going to prioritize it. This is not the same game that it was 5 years ago. Go play NCAA 10 even, you will see.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News