- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:58 am to Srbtiger06
posts in legendary election results thread
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:08 pm to nosaj56
quote:lsu winning bumped bama up since they didn't play uga.
I cannot understand for the life of me how OSU went down in computer polls?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:08 pm to nosaj56
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:08 pm to nosaj56
7 3rd place votes must have went to Stanford. That is bull shite.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:11 pm to Colonel Flagg
west coast bias.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:12 pm to Meaux Bettah
By voting their west coast team they may have damned OSU.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:12 pm to Colonel Flagg
Only reason I can see OSU falling is the K-State ISU game. Before that game, ISU was over .500, after that game, they are .500. 
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:17 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
LSUFreek
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:17 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
Only reason I can see OSU falling is the K-State ISU game. Before that game, ISU was over .500, after that game, they are .500.
No they played both teams, Im fairly certain it is a wash.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:17 pm to Srbtiger06
I guess my logic only applies to "quality losses" though.
Alabama: Maybe a slight bump because their loss is now 13-0
OSU: Their loss WAS a team over .500, now they're AT .500
LSU: OU won this week, WVU won this week, and nobody else on our schedule played.
Does this mean we actually gave Bama a boost and dropped points ourselves because we won?
Alabama: Maybe a slight bump because their loss is now 13-0
OSU: Their loss WAS a team over .500, now they're AT .500
LSU: OU won this week, WVU won this week, and nobody else on our schedule played.
Does this mean we actually gave Bama a boost and dropped points ourselves because we won?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:18 pm to dgtiger3
quote:
No they played both teams, Im fairly certain it is a wash.
That's what I would think, but the ONLY reason I can see OSU actually losing points is because the team they lost to is no longer OVER .500. It makes zero sense though.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:19 pm to WavinWilly
I think this could be really close.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:22 pm to WikiTiger
quote:
that means Oklahoma State got 29.5% of the second place votes.
They might have gotten higher than that.
I am sure sure at least one person has them 4 or lower, negating some 2nd place votes
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:32 pm to Moots
When do they publish who each coach voted?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:34 pm to Volvagia
quote:
They might have gotten higher than that.
I am sure sure at least one person has them 4 or lower, negating some 2nd place votes
David Shaw and a couple of other PAC 12 coaches probably voted Oklahoma State behind Stanford.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:34 pm to VegasPro
quote:
When do they publish who each coach voted?
Later today.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:37 pm to trackfan
just as likely pro Bama people voted Stanford 3rd for a wedge.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:38 pm to Moots
I expected more from the Coaches. If their team had won a conference championship, they would want to play in the title game.
this vote is bogus
even the coaches do not care about conference titles
this vote is bogus
even the coaches do not care about conference titles
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News