Started By
Message

52% of women are now child free. Take that patriarchy!

Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:37 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82140 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:37 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46662 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:40 am to

They're going to end up making the dystopian Handmaid's Tale world they feared , only it'll be nothing like they imagined.
Posted by BarnHater
Member since May 2015
8766 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:45 am to
Women have forgot their place in society.

Most of them are disgusting, vile demons now. Finding one that understands their place is almost impossible.
Posted by PNW_TigerSaint
Member since Oct 2016
1369 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:47 am to
That seems pretty low. Id expect a very high % of women under 30 to be child free these days implying that a very high % of 30-39 do have children. This statistic doesn’t seem particularly alarming.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
13792 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:49 am to
They are single.
They are free.

They are buzzing
like a killer bee.

Flitting and flirting
from tree to tree.

But when they’re old
and not so bold;

They will question
what they’ve been told.

A family gives you love
from God above.

Open your heart
and be blessed.

That child you want
is why you nest.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20848 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:55 am to
The actual statistic is that they are childless, not child free. Meaning that the majority of child bearing women have not had kids YET.

Also, I found this exchange on Reddit pretty funny:

Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16857 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:01 am to
But also more women in their 40’s and late 30’s are having kids than ever.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59041 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:02 am to
Feminist at 20: Women are child-FREE!!!

Feminist at 45: Why can't I get pregnant?????

The anti-science crowd refuses to acknowledge that women -unlike men- have a timer on how long they can reproduce and Nature doesn't give a flying frick about whether they consider it to be "fair" or not.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82140 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:04 am to
quote:

But also more women in their 40’s and late 30’s are having kids than ever.


Which means they will likely only get one.

That's not replacement level production.

Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46915 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:06 am to
quote:

This statistic doesn’t seem particularly alarming.


If you understand math, it's alarming.

If the average age between generations moves from 20 to 35 years, what happens to populations?
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16857 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:07 am to
quote:

Which means they will likely only get one.

That's not replacement level production.


Idk why it’s such an issue.

The main concern people have about the population dipping are social programs.

AI will probably fill the void and take jobs the newer generations would’ve had anyways.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10989 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:11 am to
quote:

But also more women in their 40’s and late 30’s are having kids than ever.


So women in advanced maternal age having babies presents other issues I'm sure they weren't aware of in their 20s.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44083 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:13 am to
quote:

Idk why it’s such an issue. The main concern people have about the population dipping are social programs. AI will probably fill the void and take jobs the newer generations would’ve had anyways.


This makes sense on the surface.

Importing 10’s of millions of illegals simultaneously does not.
Posted by armtackledawg
Member since Aug 2017
14455 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:17 am to
As long as it is mostly liberal women not spreading their genetics, this is good
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82140 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:20 am to
quote:

As long as it is mostly liberal women not spreading their genetics, this is good


Except those same leftists women usher in millions of 3rd worlders.

They aren't not replacing themselves, they are replacing themselves with a much lower quality product.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 8:07 am
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4636 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:38 am to
From 2023 stats, the average age of a women in the US to have her first child is 27.5 years of age. For college educated women, it is 31.0 years of age. I would like to see the percentage of women who are child less from 30-39 yrs. of age. It may be more telling.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80593 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:41 am to
quote:

much lower quality product


quote:

leftists women


Are you sure it's a downgrade?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114960 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Feminist at 20: Women are child-FREE!!!

Feminist at 45: Why can't I get pregnant?????


Like the opening scenes from Idiocracy
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
3453 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:58 am to
Also 52% of women are Godless, brainwashed wastes.
Posted by Judnnc
Member since Jun 2025
610 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:00 am to
percentage of WHITE women probably much higher
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram