Started By
Message

re: 52% of women are now child free. Take that patriarchy!

Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:17 am to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82414 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Are you sure it's a downgrade?


Our leftist women are completely mis programmed but they still have a better genetic core processor than low IQ 3rd worlders.

Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
9026 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Feminist at 45: Why can't I find a man?????


spot on... See my page 3
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 10:20 am
Posted by IMSA_Fan
Member since Jul 2024
836 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I am not trying to be racist, but showing how some woman can be... I know a few white women that have said all their lives... "I only date Black men."

So in their 40's and about 4 kids later by 4 different baby daddies, I see them on Facebook saying: "How come I can't find a good man?"

Now I am not saying that Black men can't be good men. But when you personally choose to eliminate 87% of the USA population as your dating pool because of their skin color... Well. What you get is what you get.

But I also feel that a large portion of the females in this country have turned into blue haired liberal screaming twats, with a loud mouth know it all's, and I wouldn't date them if they were the last twats on earth.

If you are a White American Male.. Either find a Conservative girl or a Hispanic or Asian female... You will be better off.

Date a democrat and you will reap what you sew.

This is slightly dated but women aged 18-29 favored Harris to Trump 65%-30%. Thus, male's are cutting out 65%+ of the population if they only want to date conservative / Trump-supporting younger women.

LINK

In the most recent Economist / YouGov poll - Trump is 31 points underwater with women - so also like 65-35

LINK
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 10:23 am
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65544 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:28 am to
You can bet that white chicks make up a disproportionate percentage of that number.

The brainwashing worked.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50051 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:44 am to
There's been a plan ever since at least the 1970's to turn women into something that the overwhelming majority of them were never meant to be. Generally speaking, the plan was to make them act and behave more like men. Problem is, just like men make for very poor imitations of women, women were never created to act and behave like men.

The sad part? Their plan worked. Hence, all of the dysfunctional crap we see today.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50051 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:47 am to
Duplicate
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 10:48 am
Posted by Judnnc
Member since Jun 2025
631 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

There's been a plan ever since at least the 1970's to turn women into something that the overwhelming majority of them were never meant to be. Generally speaking, the plan was to make them act and behave more like men. Problem is, just like men make for very poor imitations of women, women were never created to act and behave like men.

The sad part? Their plan worked. Hence, all of the dysfunctional crap we see today.


yes
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
6583 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:50 am to
I'm so glad I'm older than that generation and found a good women.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50051 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

But also more women in their 40’s and late 30’s are having kids than ever.


Which is kind of scary. Not ideal, to say the least.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82414 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Generally speaking, the plan was to make them act and behave more like men.



The democrat party is the party of masculine women and feminine men.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28170 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:23 am to
quote:

That seems pretty low. Id expect a very high % of women under 30 to be child free these days implying that a very high % of 30-39 do have children. This statistic doesn’t seem particularly alarming.


Yeah, its not like our birth rates are cratering or anything.

Oh, wait...
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16913 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Yeah, I have a couple friends of mine from HS that just had their first baby at 46.. And thats a hard fricking pass for me.. My youngest child will graduate the same year i turn 50 that is A-ok with me.. Couldn't imagine having a newborn right now..


I understand what you’re saying, but what I think people don’t consider is future generations will live longer.

With the advancement of medical science, stem cells, and growth hormone/TRT, you will see the life expectancy increase in our generation.

There’s a chance that people will start living to be 100+ and a 50 year-old will be in the same physical shape as a 30 year-old in a few decades.


Having babies in your early 40s or late 30s may become the norm because it would be the equivalent of having them in your early 20s in the future.

My grandfather was a physician for 55 years and told me all about this right before he passed a few years ago and he was right.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 11:29 am
Posted by Lizardman2
Member since Jan 2024
2763 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:47 am to
That's simply a result of women being more "evolved" with regard to being more career-minded and independent IMHO.

If anything, I'd like to applaud the % of that 52% that have absolutely zero business EVER bringing a child into the world and being a parent.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13542 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

What is your place?


Well, let's examine the biological reality of the situation.

Men are biologically better suited to physically survive and defend attacks, and as a collective, it's not close. That's why it's a man's place to do things like be subject to a military draft in which they would serve in combat roles. That's a man's duty based on the biological reality of the world. To exert force—and risk life and limb doing so—to defend themselves and others and establish order in society, enforce rights, etc..

Women can do one thing that men can't do. They can give birth to offspring.

Seems like society depends on that duty being fulfilled just like it depends on the man's duty to enforce and defend being fulfilled.

But for some reason everyone acts like women are the ones who are enslaved even though they—as a voting bloc—can elect leaders who will start wars that they do not have to fight and die for; that men—by law—are compelled to die for, in fact, yet there is no corresponding societal mandate that they fulfill their own biological role and give birth to/rear children.

In fact, society cheers when they refuse that role.

You seem to be one of those cheering.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13542 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

and he was right.


Based on what?

Who is living to over 100 in any significant numbers?

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13542 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

There's been a plan ever since at least the 1970's to turn women into something that the overwhelming majority of them were never meant to be.


Try since the 1800s.

I don't know why everybody believes that feminism only became radically opposed to the nuclear family in the 3rd and 4th wave. It was there from the beginning.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55587 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Men are biologically better suited to physically survive and defend attacks, and as a collective, it's not close. That's why it's a man's place to do things like be subject to a military draft in which they would serve in combat roles. That's a man's duty based on the biological reality of the world. To exert force—and risk life and limb doing so—to defend themselves and others and establish order in society, enforce rights, etc..

It certainly used to be that way. I’m 63 and never served. There is no draft. War is now being fought with drones. We are in a major war with Iran right now and have suffered only 13 deaths. Women can fulfill most military roles as well as men. Obviously they can’t do the special forces roles as well, but sitting on a ship looking at a screen?
quote:

In fact, society cheers when they refuse that role.

You seem to be one of those cheering.

I have four children and I’m expecting my 14th grandchild. And I’ve often decried, on this board, the low birth rates of the rest of you slackers.

I believe each of us should be free to determine our own role. If a man wants to be a stay-at-home father, or a woman wants to be a warrior, so be it, so long as they have the wherewithal to fill the requirements.

When my wife retired from her professional job, at age 24 to raise her children, she encountered a lot of social pressure from women saying, “I cold never do that.” That was in 1987. I don’t like that kind of pressure, neither against staying home, nor against having a career. Just let people do what they want. As you pointed out, nature will then sort things out.
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16913 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Based on what? Who is living to over 100 in any significant numbers?


I’m talking particularly about the increase in stem cells and TRT being used to increase the quality of life amongst middle age groups. It’s happening as we speak.

50 years old today is not 50 years old during the 70’s.

The people living past 100 often is predicted to happen within the next century.

You don’t agree that the life expectancy will increase in our lifetime?
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 1:22 pm
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20907 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

You see a difference between "not having kids" and "not having kids yet"? They both equal to not having kids.


They’re not equal.

The OP tweet and many feminist child free advocates are celebrating this statistic as if it’s a liberation a women from the patriarchal constraints of motherhood. The statistic just says 52% women between 20 and 39 haven’t had kids. It says nothing about their stance on having kids.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 1:30 pm
Posted by Judnnc
Member since Jun 2025
631 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Women can do one thing that men can't do. They can give birth to offspring.


Nonsense! Just ask any leftist doctor or politician!
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram