Started By
Message

Kingdom of Heaven Director’s Cut

Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:48 am
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12604 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:48 am
Is the Director’s Cut markedly better than the theatrical release? The theatrical release was fine but not a good movie. Seems like so much was left on the cutting room floor. It was disjointed and the hero was almost a Mary Sue. Whereas the Director’s Cut seems to build his story more.

Is that accurate? Been a while since I’ve seen it and I might watch it tonight.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22530 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:51 am to
Yes the theatrical release is dogshit- legitimately a terrible movie- and Ridley's cut is one of the best films ever made.

If anyone ever asks you what editing is, the contrast between the two is a masterclass
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 5:58 pm
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3197 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:05 am to
Yes and there is multiple threads on this topic as well.
Ridley Scotts Directors cut was great.
They get pretty good in depth about the film and even some of the horstical content behind it.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474977 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Is the Director’s Cut markedly better than the theatrical release?

Uh, yeah.

I still remember walking out of that movie in the theater saying like it felt like we were missing an entire movie, only to find out a few months later that was 100% correct.

The movie still has flaws, but the DC adds so much depth both in the introduction and in Jerusalem.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
42933 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 10:38 am to
Yep. Such a great movie. There needs to be more Crusades’ movies. The first 30 minutes of Kingdom of Heaven are up there with the opening of Gladiator in Germania vs the goths. Just peak Ridley cinematography. I would’ve watched a movie just following Liam and his crew around Europe on their way to Jersualem.


I actually did a re watch a few weeks ago and never realized Jamie Lannister is the Sheriff that comes after them in the woods.

Guy de Lusignan is also a very underrated antagonist and the fight between him and Balian should’ve never been cut.


Ridley Scott with the Game of Thrones source material would’ve been incredible. Maybe he can direct a spin off movie when they eventually decide to run GoT spin offs into the ground.


1. Kubrick
2. Nolan
3. Denis
4. Ridley (but at his best is THE best imo)
5. Malick (even though his movies bore me to tears)
6. Wes Anderson
7. Tarantino

This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 10:51 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474977 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:

There needs to be more Crusades’ movies. The first 30 minutes of Kingdom of Heaven are up there with the opening of Gladiator in Germania vs the goths. Just peak Ridley cinematography. I would’ve watched a movie just following Liam and his crew around Europe on their way to Jersualem.


I'd suggest you try out this book: Pilgrim: A Medieval Horror



quote:

A German knight and his companions journey home after seven years in the Holy Land, facing horrors inspired by Arabic, Christian, and pre-Islamic traditions.




I didn't finish it b/c it got a bit repetitive and it's pretty dense. However, I ran through the first half (or so) of the book. It's very historically accurate and even at the exact time of KOH (Baldwin is a child in the book, IIRC). They spend a good bit of time in Jerusalem early on and it goes into excruciating detail about living in the city and what the crusades were like.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4336 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 12:29 pm to
It’s infinitely better than the original version. Way more immersive and makes the viewer feel like he or she is going on a journey throughout the Middle East with Orlando Bloom’s character.

Ridley Scott in the 2000s was untouchable. Dude should have just called it quits 10 to 15 years ago when his peak was clearly over
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12604 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:23 pm to
I’m not going to, but your point was made. Sorry I made you reply again
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474977 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Dude should have just called it quits 10 to 15 years ago when his peak was clearly over


I think he has multiple movies in the queue and he's pushing 90
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24311 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:02 am to
Made by someone who actually understands the Crusades -- Ridley does not.
Posted by QC Reb
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2022
199 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 12:13 pm to
There are a few problems with Kingdom of Heaven. One is that it very clearly tries to push the crusades as an act of Christian aggression against the peaceful Muslim native inhabitants of the land.

The protagonist and other characters who are meant to be the good guys are shown to be openly agnostic and cynical while the characters who are deeply Christian are shown to be blood thirsty villains. Think back to the scene of when the Knight of Hospitaller tells Balian "I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of God". It is a good quote but is completely ahistorical. It is adding modern sensibilities into characters who existed in the 12th century.

Meanwhile Saladin is shown to be righteous and Godfearing. His faith isn't treated as dangerous or violent and they don't feel the need to downplay his faith by having him act like a skeptic. He is depicted as wise and tolerant despite the fact that the real Saladin was a jihadist through and through. His ultimate goal was to spread Islam to the entire world by the sword.

There are other examples that show this, but when it boils down to it, it really seems like Ridley Scott is trying to place the blame of all the atrocities of the crusades on the Christians and portray Christianity as the more dangerous of the two religions. This is despite the fact that by the time of the First Crusade, Islam had conquered and forcibly converted nearly 2/3rds of the Christian world.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65124 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Yes the theatrical release is dogshit- legitimately a terrible movie- and Ridley's cut is one of the best films ever made.

I've heard this before. I keep meaning to watch it but I never do.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474977 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:22 pm to
It's not one of the best movies ever made but it's a vastly superior movie and experience.

It's in the very good with flaws, range.

The theatrical is just a slog
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60328 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:26 pm to
The director’s cut is 100% worth a watch
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
1744 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:27 pm to
One movie I think could have deserved a prequel. Liam Neeson and Jeremy Irons characters
.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65124 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:48 pm to
Well, here it is for free on YT if anyone wants to watch it.

Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
42933 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile Saladin is shown to be righteous and Godfearing. His faith isn't treated as dangerous or violent and they don't feel the need to downplay his faith by having him act like a skeptic. He is depicted as wise and tolerant despite the fact that the real Saladin was a jihadist through and through. His ultimate goal was to spread Islam to the entire world by the sword.


Yeah this is my main gripe with the movie as well. In that vein, Kingdom of Heaven was about 15 years ahead of schedule with white Christian male bad, everyone else good
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19418 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 5:01 pm to
Is the director's cut available anywhere for streaming, or do you have to buy it?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474977 posts
Posted on 4/20/26 at 5:49 pm to
It's available every once in awhile on Prime, but typically you have to buy it. Ago at a used Blu-Ray store for like $5
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram