- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
These moon photos from Artemis are impressive
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:44 am
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:44 am
With that said, I don’t see any need to land on the moon
17
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:45 am to nicholastiger
Would be cool to see those pictures.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:45 am to nicholastiger
quote:
I don’t see any need to land on the moon
Egg sucker.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:46 am to nicholastiger
It feels like my radiation levels spike every time I think about them going out that far.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:48 am to nicholastiger
quote:
With that said, I don’t see any need to land on the moon
You do it because we can. It's that simple.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:50 am to nicholastiger
quote:
With that said, I don’t see any need to land on the moon
They need to test out the lander before than can shoot for Mars
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:53 am to nicholastiger
quote:
I don’t see any need to land on the moon
imagine being this uncurious about the universe in which we live
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:54 am to nicholastiger
quote:
With that said, I don’t see any need to land on the moon
Gotta land on it first before you build a base.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:55 am to nicholastiger
These photos of ops mother are impressive.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:55 am to nicholastiger
i see no evidence of prior landing in photos.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:00 am to nicholastiger
quote:
I don’t see any need to land on the moon
Why not?
As John F. Kennedy said in his speech at Rice University, "But why some say the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask, why climb the highest mountain?"
Is there no sense of exploration anymore? No sense of excitement? No sense of accomplishment?
Why not go to the Moon, or Mars, or all of the way to the moons of Jupiter? Do you want to be stuck on this planet forever?
Don't give me that "the money could be spent better solving problems on Earth" bullshite. How many trillions upon trillions have we spent on that, and where has it got us? Besides, the space budget is a spit in a rainstorm overall.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:01 am to nicholastiger
Did they get pics of all the equipment and flag etc, that we left up there?
Please share if so. Would love to see
Please share if so. Would love to see
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:10 am to nicholastiger
First time I've said BRB using imagination outside of a babe thread.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:12 am to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:14 am to Chad504boy
life on the moon has been found!
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:18 am to Chad504boy
Next time you pray to God, thank him for putting the atmosphere around our planet. Imagine if earth were getting pounded by all the meteorites that have hit the moon throughout time. Some of those craters are as big as cities.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:19 am to Chad504boy
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:26 am to BayouBengal51
article in "The Guardian" ( I know, I know) asking a British Astro physicist or whatever, if there was anything to gain by this mission. Not really. Mostly a sightseeing tour. there have been other flybys on the darkside. plenty of pictures and data about the moon already in hand. BUT, it is a neat engineering feat to do it. that was his take. (paraphrasing, of course)
This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 10:27 am
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:42 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Did they get pics of all the equipment and flag etc, that we left up there?
Please share if so. Would love to see
No, Artemis II did not get images of the Apollo landing sites because their closest approach to the lunar surface was a little over 4,000 miles, on the opposite side of the Moon from the sites. Even if they were on the correct side of the Moon, the cameras they had would not have been able to photograph the sites from that distance.
However, here are some images of the Apollo landing sites taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The sites have also been photographed by the Japanese SELENE spacecraft, India's Chandrayaan-1 and Chandrayaan-2 spacecraft, and South Korea's Danuri spacecraft. Even China has stated that they had images of the Apollo sites from their Chang'e 2 spacecraft, but have not released them.
Apollo 11
Apollo 12
Apollo 14
Apollo 15
Apollo 16
Apollo 17
Apollo 11 from Chandrayaan-2
This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 10:47 am
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:44 am to TheFonz
Moon deniers hate this 1 simple trick!
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News