- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is officially the single dumbest clueless absurd statement in the history of mankind.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:48 am
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:48 am
There needs to be a substantial, global movement to regulate artificial intelligence (AI)
That is simply the most mind numbing, stupid fricking thing ever said.
So Congress wants to regulate artificial intelligence……..Congress.
The same body that took 47 years to regulate cigarettes wants to get ahead of something that’s evolving every six months. That’s like trying to catch a tornado with a butterfly net.
We cannot regulate ourselves out of doing things we are clearly capable of doing. That is not our history. Our history is: if a human being can do something, somewhere, one of us is already doing it in a garage, on three energy drinks, with a Discord server cheering him on.
That’s humanity. We did not split the atom and then gather respectfully in a circle to discuss emotional boundaries. We made the bomb first. The ethics meeting came in later with a slideshow.
And now people are like, “We need to regulate AI.”
Oh, absolutely. Because human beings are famous for hearing the phrase “do not” and responding with restraint.
That has always worked beautifully.
That’s why nobody speeds.
Nobody pirates movies.
Nobody takes drugs.
Nobody hacks anything.
Nobody gambles.
Nobody cheats on taxes.
Nobody owns illegal guns.
Nobody downloads a VPN and clicks “I am in Luxembourg now.”
And teenage boys have never once looked at a warning label and taken it as a personal challenge.
But sure, this time we’ll stop the most powerful technology ever invented with a committee.
You really think the people who ask their nephew how to unmute Zoom are going to regulate machine intelligence?
And even if they pass something here, and that alone is a Broadway musical in three acts, what exactly is the plan internationally?
What, we regulate it in America and then China says,
“You know what, out of respect for your bipartisan framework, we’re going to slow down too”?
Of course.
And while we’re at it, let’s ask ransomware gangs and black-market coders if they’d mind honoring the Senate markup process.
That’s the fantasy.
That the whole world is going to nod solemnly and say,
“Yes, the United States has released a thoughtful 312-page compliance framework. We will all now behave.”
No.
That is not how humans work.
That is not how nations work.
That is not how competition works.
If AI means military advantage, economic advantage, surveillance advantage, propaganda advantage, cyber advantage, corporate advantage — then everybody is pushing forward.
Everybody.
Friends, enemies, allies, rivals, corporations, criminals, bored teenagers, lunatics in basements, guys with anime avatars and a processor farm in Belarus — everybody.
That’s what makes the conversation so absurd.
People talk about regulating AI like it’s a noisy bar that can be shut down at 10 p.m.
It’s not a bar.
It’s an arms race with venture capital.
And Congress is standing there with a clipboard asking if everyone has filled out the proper forms.
It’s adorable.
It’s completely insane.
But it’s adorable.
That is simply the most mind numbing, stupid fricking thing ever said.
So Congress wants to regulate artificial intelligence……..Congress.
The same body that took 47 years to regulate cigarettes wants to get ahead of something that’s evolving every six months. That’s like trying to catch a tornado with a butterfly net.
We cannot regulate ourselves out of doing things we are clearly capable of doing. That is not our history. Our history is: if a human being can do something, somewhere, one of us is already doing it in a garage, on three energy drinks, with a Discord server cheering him on.
That’s humanity. We did not split the atom and then gather respectfully in a circle to discuss emotional boundaries. We made the bomb first. The ethics meeting came in later with a slideshow.
And now people are like, “We need to regulate AI.”
Oh, absolutely. Because human beings are famous for hearing the phrase “do not” and responding with restraint.
That has always worked beautifully.
That’s why nobody speeds.
Nobody pirates movies.
Nobody takes drugs.
Nobody hacks anything.
Nobody gambles.
Nobody cheats on taxes.
Nobody owns illegal guns.
Nobody downloads a VPN and clicks “I am in Luxembourg now.”
And teenage boys have never once looked at a warning label and taken it as a personal challenge.
But sure, this time we’ll stop the most powerful technology ever invented with a committee.
You really think the people who ask their nephew how to unmute Zoom are going to regulate machine intelligence?
And even if they pass something here, and that alone is a Broadway musical in three acts, what exactly is the plan internationally?
What, we regulate it in America and then China says,
“You know what, out of respect for your bipartisan framework, we’re going to slow down too”?
Of course.
And while we’re at it, let’s ask ransomware gangs and black-market coders if they’d mind honoring the Senate markup process.
That’s the fantasy.
That the whole world is going to nod solemnly and say,
“Yes, the United States has released a thoughtful 312-page compliance framework. We will all now behave.”
No.
That is not how humans work.
That is not how nations work.
That is not how competition works.
If AI means military advantage, economic advantage, surveillance advantage, propaganda advantage, cyber advantage, corporate advantage — then everybody is pushing forward.
Everybody.
Friends, enemies, allies, rivals, corporations, criminals, bored teenagers, lunatics in basements, guys with anime avatars and a processor farm in Belarus — everybody.
That’s what makes the conversation so absurd.
People talk about regulating AI like it’s a noisy bar that can be shut down at 10 p.m.
It’s not a bar.
It’s an arms race with venture capital.
And Congress is standing there with a clipboard asking if everyone has filled out the proper forms.
It’s adorable.
It’s completely insane.
But it’s adorable.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:50 am to Geekboy
Yup, we don't even understand where its going and we want to cripple it?
Dumb.
Dumb.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:51 am to Geekboy
Simple explanation….
There simply is no money in it FOR them.
There simply is no money in it FOR them.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:01 am to Geekboy
What is the opposite of progress?
Congress!
TY TY
Congress!
TY TY
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:03 am to Geekboy
Of course government wants to regulate something that might lead people to the truth.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:04 am to Geekboy
Those of us that survived Skynet fully understand the storm that is coming.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:05 am to Geekboy
You’re surprised by this? This is no different than the mob walking into a bodega in Brooklyn, pointing a gun at the owner, and saying “look, you can stay in business, but youz gotta pay our skim. You know, for your protection or something”
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:06 am to Geekboy
“ There needs to be a substantial, global movement to regulate artificial intelligence (AI)”(quote OP)
May as well replace AI with “War”. Or “Evil”.
It would be interesting to see how far Humanity (Bodily version) can go in regard to harnessing and redirecting the Darwinian base competitive instincts that has very efficiently got us to this level of knowledge and power.
I’m going with the Biblical Eschatological narrative and the Good Lord stepping in at the last moment, “for the sake of the Elect “ to save us from ourselves.
Our Achilles heel is not that we can’t identify our problems, but that the blind masses, misguided ‘leaders’ and outright Evil powers nullifies our ability to come together and act accordingly.
It’s coming.
May as well replace AI with “War”. Or “Evil”.
It would be interesting to see how far Humanity (Bodily version) can go in regard to harnessing and redirecting the Darwinian base competitive instincts that has very efficiently got us to this level of knowledge and power.
I’m going with the Biblical Eschatological narrative and the Good Lord stepping in at the last moment, “for the sake of the Elect “ to save us from ourselves.
Our Achilles heel is not that we can’t identify our problems, but that the blind masses, misguided ‘leaders’ and outright Evil powers nullifies our ability to come together and act accordingly.
It’s coming.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:06 am to Geekboy
Congress needs to be regulated.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:06 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Of course the government wants to regulate something that might lead people to the truth.
I worry the opposite. For the information side, its already fooled people with fake videos in politics. Soon it was be absolutely indistinguishable and whats to stop flooding the of false information? Its always been a problem in human history. Newspapers and media choose what and how to report it and aren't held liable. We'll never get any real truth in the world, i suppose.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:09 am to Geekboy
Whoooooooooo, that was a doooozie!
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:09 am to Geekboy
quote:
This is officially the single dumbest clueless absurd statement in the history of mankind.
Have you forgotten the things AOC and Nancy Pelosi has said?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:30 pm to Geekboy
I thought this was going to be a quote from TDSFP.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:32 pm to Geekboy
Meh. AI is going to completely destroy western society
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:35 pm to BCvol
quote:
China approves
Yep. This is the thing that a lot of people don't seem to understand.
As soon as we start applying unilateral constraints on AI, then everyone else will almost immediately jump ahead of us.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:54 pm to Geekboy
One of the biggest issues being discussed in working groups is how to implement effective governance without rendering it just another automation program. The concept of bounded autonomy is a hard one to nail down in practice.
By the way, if bounded autonomy becomes a buzzword in the industry, ya boy was the one that introduced it to the discussion.
By the way, if bounded autonomy becomes a buzzword in the industry, ya boy was the one that introduced it to the discussion.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:56 pm to Geekboy
The antichrist is coming to your town
Posted on 4/1/26 at 4:02 pm to Geekboy
Wow that’s a ton of hyperbole.
It depends on what they mean by regulate. We already have roboethics.
You think ethics don’t matter but bitch about vaccines, social media, regular media, food, special interests in govt, etc.
I’m excited about AI’s potential on a lot of fronts, but your absolutist anarchist rejection of discussing regulation and ethics would easily pass as a bankrolled technocrat’s agenda.
It depends on what they mean by regulate. We already have roboethics.
You think ethics don’t matter but bitch about vaccines, social media, regular media, food, special interests in govt, etc.
I’m excited about AI’s potential on a lot of fronts, but your absolutist anarchist rejection of discussing regulation and ethics would easily pass as a bankrolled technocrat’s agenda.
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 4/1/26 at 4:04 pm to Geekboy
You think those grifters are going to let an emerging technology mature without them getting rich? I THINK NOT! How else will they get kickbacks to deregulate?
Popular
Back to top


20












