SCOTUS rules that bans on lgbt conversion therapy violate first amendment

quote:

---

conversion therapy,

---

For those that don't know.

quote:

---

practice that attempts to change an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression to align with heterosexual and cisgender norms.

---

The headline would've been easy to mistake if folks didn't know the intent of conversion therapy.

You're a real piece of shite if you send your kid to conversion therapy

Damn. That's a beatdown

quote:

---

Damn. That's a beatdown

---

not surprising but DEI hire was the lone dissenting vote

So, Colorado banned therapists from telling Trans wannabes what going through a transition, etc would entail.
Now, the Supreme Court says that therapists can tell these wannabes what goes on.
Is this correct?

anyone doing this to their kid should be jailed for child abuse

quote:

---

SW2SCLA

---

i think you have this backwards, at least in my understanding


conversion therapy is the therapist and doctors essentially discouraging teens and their parents from going through with any type of hormone therapy or surgery.

or at the least its them telling the patients what all it entails.

Conversion therapy is NOT trying to get people to become trans, its the OPPOSITE

now i could have it backwards too but I think i am right and understanding correctly.

this whole thread indicates how stupidly confusing the topic is.


Scotus did not address scaple/drug implementation

Scotus did tell Colorado that the state cannot ban a physiologist from talking about the ill effects of actually using the scaple/drug

Y'all are conflating gay and trans issues, per the usual.

This is abusive therapy inflicted upon gay kids by their shitheel parents to pray/beat the "gay" out of them.

From the article:

The case, Chiles v. Salazar, was brought by Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor who described herself as a practicing Christian who sometimes provides counseling informed by her faith. Chiles said she wished to offer talk therapy to minors who want to reduce feelings of same-sex attraction or feel more comfortable in their bodies.

Chiles isn’t licensed to prescribe medicine or perform surgery, so the ruling does not directly impact states’ power to regulate those sorts of interventions.

KJB's dissent was based on this person not having a license of any sort for this sort of work.