- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Umpire C.B. Bucknor has six pitches overturned by ABS system
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:37 am
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:37 am
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:45 am to lsu xman
imagine what will happen in college baseball. the umps are way worse and are missing calls half a foot out of the strike zone
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:49 am to poncho villa
quote:
imagine what will happen in college baseball. the umps are way worse and are missing calls half a foot out of the strike zone
Please remove the human element and make the Umps field administrators of the game.
And frick the SEC home office on video reviews.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 8:52 am to BigTigerJoe
quote:
And frick the SEC home office on video reviews.
I don't pay my REC dues just to have a fair, unbiased system.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:04 am to lsu xman
quote:
There were eight challenges in the game overall, five by the Reds (5 for 5)
This is why you don't limit a teams challenges if they keep getting overturned.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:10 am to lsu xman
quote:Just not true at all. Their accuracy was actually pretty damn unreal
They been getting away with doing a shite job for so long.
quote:With the movement and speed that’s truly remarkable
MLB umpire accuracy in calling balls and strikes has generally improved over the last few seasons, reaching a high point of approximately 92.8% in 2023. While 2024 saw a very slight dip in overall accuracy to around 92.5%, performance remains near historic highs
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
With the movement and speed that’s truly remarkable
I wouldn't call 92% remarkable.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:21 am to lsu xman
I only have two issues with the ABS system.
From my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) it
1) reads a few inches in front of the plate, so a ball breaking inward could be called a ball by ABS and technically cross the plate in the zone.
2) It is a standard height (8.5 inches I believe) and doesn't adjust batter to batter. This means Aaron Judge and Jose Altuve have the same strike zone according to ABS, and not "extending vertically from the midpoint between a batter’s shoulders and the top of their pants, down to the hollow beneath the kneecap" as per the rule book.
From my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) it
1) reads a few inches in front of the plate, so a ball breaking inward could be called a ball by ABS and technically cross the plate in the zone.
2) It is a standard height (8.5 inches I believe) and doesn't adjust batter to batter. This means Aaron Judge and Jose Altuve have the same strike zone according to ABS, and not "extending vertically from the midpoint between a batter’s shoulders and the top of their pants, down to the hollow beneath the kneecap" as per the rule book.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:31 am to PJinAtl
quote:
2) It is a standard height (8.5 inches I believe) and doesn't adjust batter to batter. This means Aaron Judge and Jose Altuve have the same strike zone according to ABS, and not "extending vertically from the midpoint between a batter’s shoulders and the top of their pants, down to the hollow beneath the kneecap" as per the rule book.
Wrong. It is based on each individual players height. They were all measured in spring training.
The top of the strike zone is set at 53.5% of the player height and the bottom is set at 27%.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:47 am to PJinAtl
This is completely inaccurate and there was a video put out using these exact two players.
Aaron Judge’s strike zone is 20% larger than Altuve’s
Aaron Judge’s strike zone is 20% larger than Altuve’s
Posted on 3/29/26 at 9:55 am to lsu xman
Eventually basketball fouls should be called using multi angle sensors with officials there to aid the process.
Completely infuriating when they call different games or even halfs with different rules for contact or grabbing.
A foul in the B10 should be a foul in the ACC but it isn’t and it makes for an entirely different game.
Watch the 1H of the Bama-UM game and watch the 2H. UM was clearly a better team and deserved to win, but the point is the entire game was changed by the level of contact allowed on screens and hand checks which completely altered the pace and style of play.
Why do we allow officials whims to dictate games and in an era of massive sports betting I don’t think people realize how impacted some games might be moving forward.
Completely infuriating when they call different games or even halfs with different rules for contact or grabbing.
A foul in the B10 should be a foul in the ACC but it isn’t and it makes for an entirely different game.
Watch the 1H of the Bama-UM game and watch the 2H. UM was clearly a better team and deserved to win, but the point is the entire game was changed by the level of contact allowed on screens and hand checks which completely altered the pace and style of play.
Why do we allow officials whims to dictate games and in an era of massive sports betting I don’t think people realize how impacted some games might be moving forward.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 10:07 am to moneyg
quote:
I wouldn't call 92% remarkable.
I need to know if that 92% is all pitches… a lot are clear balls and strikes that drive up that percentage
Posted on 3/29/26 at 10:10 am to lsu xman
The Atlanta Braves pitchers years ago, including Tom Glavine, wouldn’t have gotten out of the minor leagues to play professional baseball in the majors with ABS. If they made it but were forced to throw strikes, the Braves would have been a mediocre team at best. Maybe like the Pirates today!
Not sarcasm.
Not sarcasm.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 10:35 am to Deplorableinohio
The Braves were notorious, known around the League by opposing players... "Ah, that's just the Braves, the Umps bought into the Braves idea of a strike zone" etc...
Drove fans crazy in the 90s...if it was a perfect strike as framed by the catcher, it was called a strike...nevermind that the framing of the pitch was 3-inches wide off the plate.
To Baseball's credit...the special "Braves strike zone" got tightened up in the Playoffs and it showed up in results on the field.
I think the Umpiring was generally terrible in the 90s out of Ump arrogance and the conceit to "be different" or "have your own zone"... Braves took advantage of this better than anyone. Leo Mazzone understood, if he had his pitchers consistently throw framed pitches 3-inches wide off the plate, that pitch eventually becomes a standard strike. Joe West said, the Braves dugout would heckle and bully younger Umps during games until they got the zone they wanted...there was no standard but peer pressure.
Drove fans crazy in the 90s...if it was a perfect strike as framed by the catcher, it was called a strike...nevermind that the framing of the pitch was 3-inches wide off the plate.
To Baseball's credit...the special "Braves strike zone" got tightened up in the Playoffs and it showed up in results on the field.
I think the Umpiring was generally terrible in the 90s out of Ump arrogance and the conceit to "be different" or "have your own zone"... Braves took advantage of this better than anyone. Leo Mazzone understood, if he had his pitchers consistently throw framed pitches 3-inches wide off the plate, that pitch eventually becomes a standard strike. Joe West said, the Braves dugout would heckle and bully younger Umps during games until they got the zone they wanted...there was no standard but peer pressure.
This post was edited on 3/29/26 at 10:37 am
Posted on 3/29/26 at 10:49 am to 3rdRowTailgater
I do wish they could make it three dimensional where it’s over all five points of the plate.
With the way it is, a ball could break in or out of zone and be called wrong.
With the way it is, a ball could break in or out of zone and be called wrong.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:19 am to lsu xman
Yeah, we even had two pitches BACK TO BACK we challenged yesterday, and won both.
It was fricking delightful.
It was fricking delightful.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:23 am to lsu xman
First of all, they should be held to strict health levels. There is no reason to have some obese guy trying to call strikes, lower than has gut allows him to squat. If you can't get lower, you are absolutely guessing.
But who cares, the strike zone can be easily digitally called.
But who cares, the strike zone can be easily digitally called.
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:26 am to PJinAtl
quote:
reads a few inches in front of the plate, so a ball breaking inward could be called a ball by ABS and technically cross the plate in the zone.
Had a broadcast talk about this and they were saying it’s a cube and isn’t just a 2 dimensional square.
One of those discussions where they were explaining why fans see pitches 1 way, but the umps & ABS will see it different
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:40 am to lsu xman
Being exposed for the DEI hire he is.
Popular
Back to top

12











