Started By
Message

WWYD: 401K and Roth IRA

Posted on 3/19/26 at 4:08 pm
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
3134 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 4:08 pm
So I’m 40, make 135K and have next to nothing for retirement. I figured best to max out my 401K at $24,500 in an S&P Index and then use a Roth and max that out at $7,500.

Anything else I should look at doing?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40590 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 4:32 pm to
Is your health insurance plan HSA compliant? If so, max out an HSA.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
24221 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:30 pm to
If you can afford to do that, it sounds like a great plan.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26430 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Anything else I should look at doing?


Im 48. I am starting to look at brokerage accounts.

Follow your plan. Max HSA.
And at some point in the near future, start adding to a brokerage account too.

I am feeling that it is a key component to early retirement and income (tax) management.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3073 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:46 pm to
Max 2025 Roth IRA while you still can before April 15th. Only after that, start your 2026 Roth IRA
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3073 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 6:52 pm to
Max HSA and if you can afford to pay medical expenses out of pocket do so and keep receipts for future tax free HSA withdrawals but let it stay on HSA as long as you can for tax free growth.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
1008 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:03 pm to
If you truly have nothing invested for retirement at age 40, then in my opinion you should maximize your traditional tax deferred savings before doing any Roth. The reason is that when you retire, at least some of your income will be taxed in the lowest brackets, whereas if you contribute to Roth now it will be taxed at your highest marginal rate.

There are other ways of looking at it, and we never know what future tax rates will be, but you'd be paying 22-24% Fed on your Roth savings now, but maybe only have an effective tax rate of 12% in retirement. Doesn't mean not to save in the Roth, just that your bang for the buck right now is maximum tax deferred before you do any Roth.

The Roth has many advantages which go beyond just the tax issues, so it's not always about the math, but at 40 years old and no savings and a good income.....defer.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91605 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:02 pm to
If you don’t need the money and your marginal rate is 22% or higher, consider doing traditional IRA and then invest the tax savings from that and your 401k into a brokerage account. $32,000 pre-tax at 22% marginal rates should let you invest an additional $7,040 in a regular tax account.

Do the HSA like they recommended too. Also see if your 401k allows after tax contributions that you could convert to a Roth in plan. That would be better for the aforementioned $7,040 if allowed.
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
3134 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Is your health insurance plan HSA compliant? If so, max out an HSA


I have a really solid health insurance plan. Lowest deductible I’ve ever had. What is the advantage of having an HSA as well?
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6894 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:37 am to
quote:

If you truly have nothing invested for retirement at age 40, then in my opinion you should maximize your traditional tax deferred savings before doing any Roth. The reason is that when you retire, at least some of your income will be taxed in the lowest brackets, whereas if you contribute to Roth now it will be taxed at your highest marginal rate.

There are other ways of looking at it, and we never know what future tax rates will be, but you'd be paying 22-24% Fed on your Roth savings now, but maybe only have an effective tax rate of 12% in retirement. Doesn't mean not to save in the Roth, just that your bang for the buck right now is maximum tax deferred before you do any Roth.

The Roth has many advantages which go beyond just the tax issues, so it's not always about the math, but at 40 years old and no savings and a good income.....defer.
Which again makes the HSA the best of both
Posted by CenlaLowell
Alexandria, la
Member since Apr 2016
1274 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:45 am to
Max the 401k
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
3688 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 8:07 am to
Good plan. If you have to choose, I would fund Roth first, then traditional 401k. There are Roth income limits to consider. The real value of Roth comes from many years of tax free growth on the earnings. You also want to fund your HYSA.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40590 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I have a really solid health insurance plan. Lowest deductible I’ve ever had. What is the advantage of having an HSA as well?


HSA's are only available with deductibles over 1,700 single 3,400 family and out of pocket can't exceed 8,500 single and 17,000 family.

HSA is triple tax advantaged. Contributions are deducted from your income and reduce your taxable income, you can invest the contributions and they will grow tax free, and you can withdraw the funds tax and penalty free at any time for qualified medical expenses, which is a really wide range of things that count. Hell, I think a peleton bike is a qualified HSA expense

Once you hit 65 though, you can withdraw the funds as retirement income as well, though you will pay normal tax as if it was a 401k. However, any use for medical expenses in retirement, the funds will still be completely tax free, wich is really nice as you get older and medical expenses go up.

So, if only looking at retirement uses, it acts as an additional tax advantaged retirement vehicle similar to a traditional 401k (some employers even will match contributions similar to a 401k) to incentivize the employees to go with the lower cost health insurance plans.

Order of operations here for you should be to contribute to the 401k to whatever level gets the maximum match from your employer, then max out an IRA and HSA, and then the remainder of your 401k if you can.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 9:54 am
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6527 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:43 am to
No judgement but you may also want to start putting extra in after tax accounts after you max all tax saving ones. 25 years left
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 9:45 am
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
3134 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:35 am to
quote:

HSA's are only available with deductibles over 1,700 single 3,400 family and out of pocket can't exceed 8,500 single and 17,000 family. HSA is triple tax advantaged. Contributions are deducted from your income and reduce your taxable income, you can invest the contributions and they will grow tax free, and you can withdraw the funds tax and penalty free at any time for qualified medical expenses, which is a really wide range of things that count. Hell, I think a peleton bike is a qualified HSA expense Once you hit 65 though, you can withdraw the funds as retirement income as well, though you will pay normal tax as if it was a 401k. However, any use for medical expenses in retirement, the funds will still be completely tax free, wich is really nice as you get older and medical expenses go up. So, if only looking at retirement uses, it acts as an additional tax advantaged retirement vehicle similar to a traditional 401k (some employers even will match contributions similar to a 401k) to incentivize the employees to go with the lower cost health insurance plans. Order of operations here for you should be to contribute to the 401k to whatever level gets the maximum match from your employer, then max out an IRA and HSA, and then the remainder of your 401k if you can.


I appreciate the information. And my company does offer an HSA. But then I would spend more with a HDHP. My current deductible is $600. And it’s open access so I can basically see anyone I want. Coverage on Rx is amazing as well. Seems like I could just invest on my own with my current plan.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40590 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

But then I would spend more with a HDHP


Would you? The HDHP should be less expensive as far as premiums go. If you are someone that has a lot of medical expenses already, perscriptions, etc, then yea going to an HSA qualified plan may not be a good option depending on how much you'd be spending per year out of pocket compared to the other plan vs the premium savings and tax savings. They really work best if you get in one when you are young and healthy and can contribute for a number of years before you start having more costly medical expenses on a yearly basis, then at that point you can almost self-fund yourself.

quote:

Seems like I could just invest on my own with my current plan.

Yes, you absolutely can, you just won't get any tax advantages.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 11:49 am
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21874 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

But then I would spend more with a HDHP. My current deductible is $600.


How much annually do the premiums cost on your current plan? How much are the annual premiums on the HDHP?

What is the max-out-of-pocket for each plan? This is where HDHP can be highly beneficial for folks. I have had a few jobs where the cheaper premiums and a lesser MOOP made the HDHP the more affordable choice and that didn't even get into the tax savings with the HSA.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
1008 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Which again makes the HSA the best of both


I agree, but he asked about 401K
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
3688 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Order of operations here for you should be to contribute to the 401k to whatever level gets the maximum match from your employer, then max out an IRA and HSA, and then the remainder of your 401k if you can.


Good post, but OP should focus on Roth vs traditional 401k in his situation. He is still below Roth income limits and has many years of tax free earnings. Not sure that he will use backdoor Roth when income requires it, which makes Roth higher priority vs traditional presently. The callout on the triple advantage of HSA is spot on!

A simple strategy of HSA, Roth, then traditional 401 will serve him well. Any company matches are also in the mix. Always take the matches in whatever form they are offered. I once worked at a company that offered a match on traditional, but not Roth. Not sure if that is environment is still around.
Posted by TX_Tiger23
Seabrook, Texas
Member since Aug 2013
129 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 6:13 pm to
This is correct…HSAs are underutilized
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram