- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
There is a full on insurgency in Mexico extremely close to our borders
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:40 am
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:40 am
When are we going to do something to take action against this? Mexico is a total and complete failed state with either no capacity to deal with this level of escalation or way too corrupt to do it.
This cannot be allowed so close to our country if we want to take the Monroe doctrine seriously in a modern form
This cannot be allowed so close to our country if we want to take the Monroe doctrine seriously in a modern form
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:41 am to td01241
Nah, let them kill each other as long as it doesnt spill over
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:41 am to td01241
quote:
This cannot be allowed so close to our country if we want to take the Monroe doctrine seriously in a modern form
Internal issues in Mexico has literally nothing whatsoever to do with the Monroe Doctrine. Both it and the Roosevelt Corrollary are aimed at European interference in LA.
quote:
When are we going to do something to take action against this?
What do you want to happen? Put half a million troops in Mexico for two decades?
This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 11:42 am
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:42 am to Cosmo
quote:
as long as it doesnt spill over
And you’re comfortable taking this risk? What will you say or tell the peoples families who will be brutally killed if and when it does cross over?
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:42 am to td01241
Nope, let them take care (ie. kill each other) of their own turf. For now! We'll watch, observe, and be prepared to defend our homeland.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:42 am to td01241
Let them fight and then those left can petition to be our 53rd state after Greenland and Canada, and then we can help.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:42 am to Indefatigable
quote:
What do you want to happen? Put half a million troops in Mexico for two decades?
I’d be content with heavily militarizing the border at the very least.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:43 am to Cosmo
As long as it doesn’t spill over? So Americans won’t die until it spills over? Then what? Then go in?
I’m not suggesting it is time now, but you cannot wait until it spills over before taking action.
I’m not suggesting it is time now, but you cannot wait until it spills over before taking action.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:43 am to td01241
Mexico should arm their population.
This latest situation has proven to show the populace is at a distinct disadvantage when the bad guys are the only ones with guns.
Look at auto-defensas. Cartels are hesitant to frick around with these guys b/c they're armed.
This latest situation has proven to show the populace is at a distinct disadvantage when the bad guys are the only ones with guns.
Look at auto-defensas. Cartels are hesitant to frick around with these guys b/c they're armed.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:43 am to td01241
Panama has a short sea to sea border to guard than the rio grande. I see where you are going with this.
Maybe even a shorter border at Veracruz.
Maybe even a shorter border at Veracruz.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:44 am to td01241
we should tell our citizens to cease all travel to mexico since mexico cannot offer proper safety for our tourists. if you go to mexico, do not expect american help.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:44 am to td01241
quote:The Monroe doctrine only applies to foreign countries interfering with countries in the Americas.
if we want to take the Monroe doctrine seriously
I made a "A" in American history.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:44 am to Deplorableinohio
This will end like it always does. CIA picks a side, that side wins, peace returns
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:46 am to LSURussian
I know what it is dude. I stipulated modern form for a reason.
The cartels ARE the power and the state in mexico. They interfere with us domestically in many ways from benign to deadly as well as heavily threaten our interest all over the hemisphere
I would consider this part of the Monroe doctrine taking into account the way things stand now
The cartels ARE the power and the state in mexico. They interfere with us domestically in many ways from benign to deadly as well as heavily threaten our interest all over the hemisphere
I would consider this part of the Monroe doctrine taking into account the way things stand now
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:47 am to td01241
Let Sheinbaum handle it. It's going to get messy. But this is something that SHE needs to do.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:48 am to td01241
quote:
When are we going to do something to take action against this? Mexico is a total and complete failed state with either no capacity to deal with this level of escalation or way too corrupt to do it.
Do we have to do everything? Jesus Christ. Some of yall expect something for every single event. It’s tiring.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:48 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Let Sheinbaum handle it. It's going to get messy. But this is something that SHE needs to do.
She can’t and doesn’t have the capacity assuming she wanted to.
Mexico has a pretty small amount of elite marines and special forces who aren’t corrupt and mostly act on American intelligence, just as they did when they killed the guy that kicked all of this off.
This is not an army or the type of force capacity you need to combat open insurrection
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:50 am to jizzle6609
I just said we should do something.
I said I’d be content with heavily militarizing the border for now.
I swear many of you guys are so far gone at this point into the “muh we can never use military force for any reason or it’s bad” camp you don’t seem to understand what the supposed main purpose of an army even is
I said I’d be content with heavily militarizing the border for now.
I swear many of you guys are so far gone at this point into the “muh we can never use military force for any reason or it’s bad” camp you don’t seem to understand what the supposed main purpose of an army even is
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:52 am to td01241
To have an insurgency you first must have a surgency.
Mexico hasn't had one since the Maya's.
Mexico hasn't had one since the Maya's.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 11:53 am to td01241
Well, shite. I'm leaving Wednesday for Arizona for a week and will be a couple of hours north of the border. Of course a fricking border war has to break out a few days before.

This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 12:00 pm
Popular
Back to top

34








