Started By
Message

SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.

Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:05 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136875 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:05 am
Just came down.


This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 9:49 am
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6587 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:05 am to
Ok. And?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139892 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:05 am to
Posted by bradygolf98
Member since Jan 2021
3485 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:06 am to
They ruled against Trump since OP didn't say
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83414 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:06 am to
Posted by Tower_Tiger12
Member since Jan 2021
1180 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:06 am to
They ruled against 250 years of Tariffs
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136875 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:06 am to
Sounds like its "nuanced" 170 pages.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
5750 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:06 am to
Struck down.

Disappointing
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139892 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:07 am to
What now?
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8499 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:07 am to
Roberts, Barrett, and Gorsuch going with the majority.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
180792 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:08 am to
This country is finished

The globalists won
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6587 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:08 am to
Well, frick.
Posted by Root_User
Member since Dec 2025
193 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:09 am to
Wow, so pathetic!
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6587 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:09 am to
quote:

This country is finished

The globalists won


Nah. He's said there are other ways he can get it done. This is disappointing though.
Posted by SnacknGold06
Member since Oct 2025
94 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:09 am to
This is great for multinationals since their end user price is already anchored higher. Massive margins embedded.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128833 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:10 am to
What anyone should have expected. They were almost certainly illegal under the particular statute he used.

However...he can just now use a different statute and start the clock again, most likely.
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
16612 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:10 am to
There’s most likely a work around for this.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139892 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Nah. He's said there are other ways he can get it done.


Yeah, I suspect there is a shite ton of nuance in the ruling that Trump can work around.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9792 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

This is great for multinationals since their end user price is already anchored higher. Massive margins embedded.


!00% prices aren't coming down.
Posted by Reagan80
Earth
Member since Feb 2023
2242 posts
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:10 am to
Trade deals based on tariffs undone too?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram