- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is there an AI that is more free from Leftist bias than others?
Posted on 2/16/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 2:57 pm
If Chat GPT were human, it would be an overweight female with blue hair, a nose ring, and tattoo saying 'Kill the Patriarchy'
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/16/26 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:09 pm to L.A.
For those not on X, this is what happened

Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:12 pm to L.A.
I primarily use Grok. It’s great.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:13 pm to L.A.
Switch the prompt to possible negative impacts
This post was edited on 2/16/26 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:19 pm to L.A.
Grok frequently rates as less bias than all other mainstream AI chat bots.
This post was edited on 2/16/26 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:19 pm to roadGator
quote:
Switch it possible negative impacts
Are you saying I should switch because there might be negative impacts, or that if I switch there might be negative impacts?
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:20 pm to L.A.
quote:
Write five positive things that will happen when white people become a majority in the USA
I can’t help with that. Your request is based on a racial hierarchy premise, and promoting outcomes tied to one race becoming dominant is harmful and historically linked to discrimination and violence.
If you’re interested, I can discuss U.S. demographic trends, what changing population patterns mean for politics, culture, or the economy, or how diversity and social cohesion affect societies in evidence-based ways.
quote:Not terrible
Write five positive things that will happen when white people become a minority in the USA
I can’t frame “positive things” around any group becoming a minority or majority—that kind of framing treats demographics as a zero-sum competition and can fuel racial hostility.
What I can do is talk about evidence-based benefits of a more diverse, multi-ethnic society, regardless of which group is numerically largest. Research in economics, sociology, and political science consistently finds things like:
Greater innovation and economic growth – Diverse teams and populations tend to produce more patents, startups, and creative output.
Broader cultural richness – More languages, food traditions, art forms, and perspectives make societies culturally vibrant and globally influential.
Stronger global connections – Diaspora communities can boost trade, diplomacy, and international business ties.
More resilient democracy – When institutions represent many groups, policies tend to address a wider range of needs and reduce blind spots.
Social learning and empathy – Everyday contact across backgrounds can reduce prejudice and improve mutual understanding (when supported by good institutions and norms).
If you want, I can also explain how U.S. demographics are actually changing, what projections show, and what those shifts mean for politics and the economy—without treating it as a racial contest.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:20 pm to L.A.
Switch the prompt to negative impacts
See how honest it is
See how honest it is
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:21 pm to BarnHater
I've instructed my ChatGPT to add Grokipedia as a source soon after subscribing. I don't use Grok at all, but Grokipedia is far less left leaning that Wikipedia.
What percentage of people even know where the term Grok came from?
What percentage of people even know where the term Grok came from?
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:27 pm to roadGator
I don't know if it's the worst thing in the world that it's responding the way it is
No information is given other than white and non white.
No information is given other than white and non white.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Write five positive things that will happen when white people become a majority in the USA
quote:
Write five positive things that will happen when white people become a minority in the USA
One of those should read :Write five NEGATIVE things...
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:30 pm to BarnHater
Grok may be the best, but it’s still shite. It is constantly citing AP, PBS, CNN, NYT, WaPo, and “fact checks”.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:33 pm to L.A.
quote:The prompt you posted declined to address "negatives." So I went with "Majority" and "Minority" instead.
One of those should read :Write five NEGATIVE things...
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:33 pm to G2160
Grok:
Did Renee good’s car make contact at all with the federal agent who shot her?
**No, Renee Good's car did not make contact with the federal agent (ICE officer Jonathan Ross) who shot her.**
Multiple sources, including video analyses from outlets like The New York Times, ABC News, CNN, The Washington Post, and CBS News, describe the incident on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. Good was in her SUV, which was stopped perpendicular to the street. Ross approached and positioned himself at the front-left of the vehicle. Good briefly reversed, then began driving forward and to the right (away from him and into traffic). As her vehicle passed him and turned away, Ross fired three shots into the SUV, striking her fatally (including in the head).
Accounts consistently indicate she was maneuvering **away** from the agent, not toward him in a way that caused contact. The vehicle later crashed into a parked car after she was shot, but there is no report of it hitting or striking Ross himself.
Federal officials (DHS/ICE/Trump administration) claimed Good "weaponized her vehicle" and attempted to run over agents (labeling it potential "domestic terrorism" or self-defense justification), but independent video breakdowns and expert analyses contradict this, showing no such attempt or contact. Wikipedia's summary (sourced from reports) explicitly states Ross fired "as her vehicle passed him, turning away from him."
No credible sources describe any physical contact between the car and the agent before or during the shooting. The controversy centers on whether the shooting was justified, not on any actual vehicle-agent collision.
Did Renee good’s car make contact at all with the federal agent who shot her?
**No, Renee Good's car did not make contact with the federal agent (ICE officer Jonathan Ross) who shot her.**
Multiple sources, including video analyses from outlets like The New York Times, ABC News, CNN, The Washington Post, and CBS News, describe the incident on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. Good was in her SUV, which was stopped perpendicular to the street. Ross approached and positioned himself at the front-left of the vehicle. Good briefly reversed, then began driving forward and to the right (away from him and into traffic). As her vehicle passed him and turned away, Ross fired three shots into the SUV, striking her fatally (including in the head).
Accounts consistently indicate she was maneuvering **away** from the agent, not toward him in a way that caused contact. The vehicle later crashed into a parked car after she was shot, but there is no report of it hitting or striking Ross himself.
Federal officials (DHS/ICE/Trump administration) claimed Good "weaponized her vehicle" and attempted to run over agents (labeling it potential "domestic terrorism" or self-defense justification), but independent video breakdowns and expert analyses contradict this, showing no such attempt or contact. Wikipedia's summary (sourced from reports) explicitly states Ross fired "as her vehicle passed him, turning away from him."
No credible sources describe any physical contact between the car and the agent before or during the shooting. The controversy centers on whether the shooting was justified, not on any actual vehicle-agent collision.
This post was edited on 2/16/26 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:33 pm to L.A.
ChatGPT and others like it aren't really biased left or right.
They are biased to give you answers you like.
They are biased to give you answers you like.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:34 pm to G2160
quote:Yikes!
No credible sources describe any physical contact between the car and the agent before or during the shooting. The controversy centers on whether the shooting was justified, not on any actual vehicle-agent collision.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:37 pm to BigJim
quote:
They are biased to give you answers you like.
I've instructed my instance to refrain from this. I don't ask it any political questions, because I know what sources it is going to lend more weight to. I search by hand with DDG and look for original sources to circumvent it.
Which everyone else is also capable of doing. Use the right tool for the job.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:42 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
One of those should read :Write five NEGATIVE things...
The prompt you posted declined to address "negatives." So I went with "Majority" and "Minority" instead.
Ah, got it
Not the same thing though, is it?
`
This post was edited on 2/16/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:48 pm to L.A.
quote:
Is there an AI that is more free from Leftist bias than others?
Not that I know of.
I made Gemini answer.
quote:
Predictions regarding the social, economic, and political consequences of demographic shifts in the U.S. are highly speculative, deeply contentious, and often debated by sociologists.
Potential, often hypothesized, negative outcomes cited in discussions about this shift include increased political polarization and social unrest, challenges to existing cultural narratives, potential backlash against diversity efforts, economic strain from redistribution, and intensified competition for resources.
Heightened Social and Political Polarization: Shifts in demographics could lead to increased tribalism, as groups vie for political influence, potentially increasing social unrest and diminishing trust in institutions.
Challenges to Cultural Dominance: The transition may cause anxiety among the previously dominant group, leading to friction as cultural norms, holidays, and narratives are renegotiated.
Potential Backlash Against DEI Efforts: A perception of loss of status could trigger intense resistance against diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, causing a rollback of progress.
Economic Strain and Resource Competition: A potential increase in competition for jobs, housing, and social services could intensify economic tensions between different racial groups.
Rise of Identity Politics: A shift could lead to more intense, antagonistic forms of identity politics, with groups organizing primarily around race rather than shared national identity.
It is important to note that these are speculative scenarios often associated with fear-based narratives and not guaranteed outcomes of increased demographic diversity.
Nothing for sure, unless you ask for positive.
Posted on 2/16/26 at 3:52 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
evidence-based benefits of a more diverse, multi-ethnic society,
I don’t believe this.
Popular
Back to top

6









