- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
12 year worldwide meta-analysis study revealed Chemotherapy has a 97% failure rate.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:11 pm
34
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:12 pm to Ailsa
and the FDA banned vitamin C drip
ETA: FDA or whoever...
ETA: FDA or whoever...
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:15 pm to Ailsa
As a family that, unfortunately, has needed to use chemo for a family member, we are grateful for its existence and, in our case, effectiveness. 97% seems like an extremely high failure rate and many advances have been made in how targeted it is, how toxic, etc.
I would need to read the small print details of this 'meta-analysis' but I firmly believe it is money well spent. We have many other areas where abuses need to be eradicated.
I would need to read the small print details of this 'meta-analysis' but I firmly believe it is money well spent. We have many other areas where abuses need to be eradicated.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:17 pm to Ailsa
While I believe Big Pharma is evil, I do not believe anyone whose degree is ND.
ETA: ND is Doctor of Naturopathy. There is zero legitimacy to it.
ETA: ND is Doctor of Naturopathy. There is zero legitimacy to it.
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:18 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
As a family that, unfortunately, has needed to use chemo for a family member, we are grateful for its existence and, in our case, effectiveness. 97% seems like an extremely high failure rate and many advances have been made in how targeted it is, how toxic, etc.
I would need to read the small print details of this 'meta-analysis' but I firmly believe it is money well spent. We have many other areas where abuses need to be eradicated.
There are cures but they will not release them as cancer is too profitable.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:20 pm to LintLicker
quote:
While I believe Big Pharma is evil, I do not believe anyone whose degree is ND.
I know two researchers that both found cures for cancer but when they presented their findings they were told to bury them...cancer is too profitable.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:23 pm to Ailsa
There’s so much more money in chronic disease managed pharmacologically than cured pharmacologically or naturally.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:24 pm to LintLicker
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:32 pm to Ailsa
That just cannot be factual.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:37 pm to LintLicker
quote:
There is zero legitimacy to it.
Classic Ailsa post
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:38 pm to Ailsa
We have Cancer healing medicine. But big pharma will not let it come to market.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:40 pm to Ailsa
Ok show proof
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:41 pm to Tigertittie
Proof?! We got a another Ailsa Twitter link post. What more do we need?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:44 pm to Ailsa
frick cancer
I don’t believe that number. I do believe there are fricked up doctors out there that are selling “hope” and over shooting peoples chances.
Close family member had a VA doctor run every chemical possible through his veins. He spent two years like a zombie and covered in sores before he had enough. At least he had another year or so of normal decent life before the cancer itself took over.
I don’t believe that number. I do believe there are fricked up doctors out there that are selling “hope” and over shooting peoples chances.
Close family member had a VA doctor run every chemical possible through his veins. He spent two years like a zombie and covered in sores before he had enough. At least he had another year or so of normal decent life before the cancer itself took over.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:50 pm to Ailsa
Yeah...that's bullshite.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 6:53 pm to Ailsa
Life has a 100% fatality rate. The question is whether they gain some time and quality of life.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 7:01 pm to Ailsa
But at least you get to suffer a lot before dying anyway.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 7:02 pm to Ailsa
quote:
There are cures but they will not release them as cancer is too profitable.
Seriously, I’ve been hearing this since I was a child. I’m almost 60 now.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 7:08 pm to Ailsa
Watch the water
Patriots in control
Lullaby
The Cure
You have more than you know
Patriots in control
Lullaby
The Cure
You have more than you know
Posted on 2/14/26 at 7:09 pm to High C
I mean…. I think people underestimate the value of a literal cure to cancer.
The problem is people think a “cure”
to cancer means we just don’t get it anymore
As we age our DNA breaks down and we develop cancer. that will always happen and always has. We have 3000 year old human remains with signs of metasticized cancer.
The problem is people think a “cure”
to cancer means we just don’t get it anymore
As we age our DNA breaks down and we develop cancer. that will always happen and always has. We have 3000 year old human remains with signs of metasticized cancer.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News