- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kid writes 25 lines of code that can unredact all of the Epstein files in less than 30sec
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:01 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. And then suddenly the human Ken doll Thune... calls to redact all the Epstein files...
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:03 pm to cajunangelle
I don't think that's real.
Eta: Why JUST the Epstein files? Why wasn't this done with JFK Files?
Eta: Why JUST the Epstein files? Why wasn't this done with JFK Files?
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:05 pm to cajunangelle
Yeah, that's bull shite.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:06 pm to cajunangelle
Ehhhhhhhhh. If these files are copies made after the redaction... that can't be done. Not with 5, 25, or 1,025 lines of code.
If these are pdfs that were redacted and then just put out there in pdf form, I wouldn't doubt that could be done.
If these are pdfs that were redacted and then just put out there in pdf form, I wouldn't doubt that could be done.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:07 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Yea I doubt this.
This would be a gross negligence type of thing. Someone would had to have wanted the information released.
Digitally redacting info on documents is basic and impossible to undo.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:07 pm to cajunangelle
Should have said “grown man falls for clickbait bullshite and reposts it without doing any due diligence but feels like he’s dunked on 47”
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:09 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Should have said “grown man falls for clickbait bullshite and reposts it without doing any due diligence but feels like he’s dunked on 47”
Or more accurately long time Trump supporter and adult woman...
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:11 pm to LuckyTiger
That Mario guy that Is often retweeted by Elon... Posted this this morning but he's made so many posts I can't find it.
So I presumed it was true. Who knows?
So I presumed it was true. Who knows?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:14 pm to cajunangelle
Alright KID - release the damn NAMES!
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:15 pm to sidewalkside
I also Presumed This Was believable because the last batch was easy to unredact
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:18 pm to cajunangelle
That's not how that works.
99% of software that does redaction type annotations will create a separate image of the document with the annotation - it's not any type of "layer" that can be removed or anything of the sorts.
99% of software that does redaction type annotations will create a separate image of the document with the annotation - it's not any type of "layer" that can be removed or anything of the sorts.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:20 pm to Pickle_Weasel
This is why unfettered social media sucks
AI is just going to make this worse for older people.
AI is just going to make this worse for older people.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:28 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
If these are pdfs that were redacted and then just put out there in pdf form, I wouldn't doubt that could be done.
If you can write a few lines of code to unredact the documents, you can certainly write a few lines of code that digitally redacts the names.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:43 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
If you can write a few lines of code to unredact the documents, you can certainly write a few lines of code that digitally redacts the names.
If you have access to pdf and the document, you wouldn't need any code. You could just place the redactions. There is a function for that. But I imagine all that stuff is pretty controlled as it relates to those files.
But if these documents were redacted in .pdf.. and then scanned or printed. No code is going to unredact that. Even just going from pdf to an image file. There is no data left to work with after that.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 3:45 pm
Popular
Back to top

7








