It’s plain stupid to think Epstein is alive

He was or still is a HUMINT node with dirt on people. Not everything is written down, you know.

He did A LOT for Israel. They remember.

quote:

---

It’s plain stupid to think Epstein is alive

---

Unless he is alive... which is certainly within the capabilities of people that we recently thought DEFINITELY killed him.

No one alive, who has a pea sized brain thinks he killed himself.

They wanted us to think someone killed him, it seems, now. Seems clear they could easily fake his death to keep him alive.

Either way. Why would someone kill him? (or) Why would someone fake his death and export him safely to where-ever?

quote:

---

If you think that’s controversial, get a load of this: not only do I believe he’s no longer alive, but I also believe that he actually killed himself. Or at the sassiest, he enlisted his cellie to “assist” him in that endeavor. Hell baw, if he were murdered in order to keep him from sharing highly damaging information, then wouldn’t you think that the victims themselves would have probably met with that same fate? I mean, they’re pretty “threatening” sources of the same exact damaging information, eh? Perhaps even more so.

---

I generally don't read a PT post with the word "baw" in it but this was embedded in the middle. Baw, what are you trying to say...

@ asmongold. Too damn funny.

So, Jeffrey was into

- Financial and tech ventures
- Aviation and asset transactions
- young ladies.
- Funding of sciences, like eugenics
- nascar
- WoW
- Fortnite

Are your expectations too lofty to give it any attention past the use of the word “baw” (merely a touch of levity is all, by the way), or is it rather that you simply don’t like what I said and would prefer not to have to address it’s substance? Because I did have an eye on keeping it relatively simple, just to be safe. Oh, and again, I try to keep much of my commentary “light spirited,” i.e. a touch of levity here and there, so as to not come across as lecturing anyone with superior thought, such as can be seen here amongst us routinely.

quote:

---

Are your expectations too lofty to give it any attention past the use of the word “baw” (merely a touch of levity is all, by the way), or is it rather that you simply don’t like what I said and would prefer not to have to address it’s substance? Because I did have an eye on keeping it relatively simple, just to be safe. Oh, and again, I try to keep much of my commentary “light spirited,” i.e. a touch of levity here and there, so as to not come across as lecturing anyone with superior thought, such as can be seen here amongst us routinely.

---

Just think BAW is dumb and low IQ. Had trouble understanding your original post. You be as sassy as you want.. LOL just some levity.

Elvis is more likely to be alive...

quote:

---

Just think BAW is dumb and low IQ.

---

That seems a little harsh and over the top - but I’m comfortable with criticism. Although I would say that I haven’t had many complaints about not being able to decipher or understand an entire post of mine…..or I guess at least no one who’s openly admitted it.

No problem though. I’ll attempt to put it a different way, more to the point, although I find that if you skimp on context oftentimes folks will fill in the blanks themselves with, let’s just call it “non-ideal” info. Anyhow, put another way, I basically meant that it wouldn’t necessarily make sense for Epstein to have been silenced by the way of murder, yet the victims themselves are left alone despite having full possession of the same exact damaging information about the purported sexual predators as Epstein himself did. In other words, the victims are pretty glaring “loose ends” that doesn’t seem to align with the “silencing Epstein and eliminate the source of the threat” narrative.