Started By
Message

Cool illustration showing gains of the S&P over the last 50 years

Posted on 12/26/25 at 10:31 pm
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
2968 posts
Posted on 12/26/25 at 10:31 pm
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11090 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 6:16 am to
S&P 500 is the single greatest gift for investors no matter how much you put in provided you stay the course. It’s basically idiot proof.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49239 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 8:41 am to
The NASDAQ has an average of 14.95% annual return with 12 down years over the same timespan. The S&P 500 is really fricking solid and I’m a big fan, but I’m equally in love with the NASDAQ because it rewards risk with higher returns.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
3207 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 8:45 am to
I saved this yesterday. I am trying to teach my kids and grandkids about investing, and think this is a helpful view. It is a nice alternative to a graph.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16061 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 10:02 am to
Nice exhibit

2000-2003 was rough

Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
79387 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:

2000-2003 was rough


The runup from 1995-99 was more than what was justified. Had to come back to normal.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
8937 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 5:43 pm to
S&P being down 3 years in a row . Fed will never let that happen again . Money printer go boom!
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5071 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 9:41 pm to
Imagine being in your 60s and still fully in equities in 2000. Would have been a rough 3 years as you waited for the rebound.
Posted by CHGAR
Haile, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1256 posts
Posted on 12/27/25 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Nice exhibit

2000-2003 was rough


Some of my best years ever.
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5071 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 11:06 am to
Please tell us how
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46821 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Imagine being in your 60s and still fully in equities in 2000. Would have been a rough 3 years as you waited for the rebound.
so? You’d be 63 and have more money than when you were 60

Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5071 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:42 pm to
From 2000 to 2002? Maybe I don't understand what equities are but it looks like the stock market was pretty bad those 3 years. I guess some people made money investing but I assume most lost based off the OPs graphic.
Posted by CHGAR
Haile, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1256 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:12 pm to
Shorted a lot of junk.
Posted by wiltznucs
Apollo Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2005
9263 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

2000-2003 was rough


Had a very good friend who’s wife was a Corporate Trainer for WorldCom. They were living the high life. Amazing home in ATL; another in SWFL. Vacationing like nobodies business. Only the nicest cars with an Au Pair from France raising their kids. Then the company went bust; her salary was gone and the vast majority of her savings was in company stock now worth nothing. They went from paper rich to fricking destitute practically overnight. Lost everything. She ended up losing her mind; became a “sovereign citizen”; at least that’s what she told the judge, with a newly developed drug habit and then lost custody of her kids. Wild times indeed. He now lives in a small apartment in Valdosta, GA. She’s off the grid. Even the kids can’t find her.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 8:54 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46821 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:20 pm to
one of my uncles is a worldcom multimillionaire. He got out and sold his stock about a year before the collapse.
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
2968 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:34 pm to
That is one hell of a story
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86614 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

From 2000 to 2002? Maybe I don't understand what equities are but it looks like the stock market was pretty bad those 3 years. I guess some people made money investing but I assume most lost based off the OPs graphic.
only if they sold.
Posted by wiltznucs
Apollo Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2005
9263 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:51 am to
quote:

one of my uncles is a worldcom multimillionaire. He got out and sold his stock about a year before the collapse.


Willing to bet that he knew her. Sad story. I was relatively fresh out of college and didn’t know shite about investing. Watched my entire 401K disappear when I got my quarterly updates. Finally got back on my feet only to watch half of my home equity disappear only a few years later. A portion of Gen X has had a rough go of it for sure.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46821 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 10:15 am to
probably so...he was a senior VP at MCI Worldcom
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
25036 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Imagine being in your 60s and still fully in equities in 2000. Would have been a rough 3 years as you waited for the rebound.



Sequence of returns risk is so difficult to account for....even the best plans can really take a beating on this alone. Difficult (costly) to hedge all risk out of a plan.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 10:27 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram