- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Engineers of the OB needed (bridge advice)
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:27 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:27 am
Gents, I have a 12’ span that I think will be easier to build a small bridge over rather than redo the blocked culvert and place a new bigger one then fill over it. My question is, will (2) 16 foot long, 8” in diameter pilings support 6k pounds for a 12’ span? I plan on spacing them 70” apart to be directly below my tractor tires and having 2 feet on each side in the dirt. TIA
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:38 am to magicman534
I'm not an engineer but I would have 4, 2 on either side.
6k is a lot of weight for 8"
6k is a lot of weight for 8"
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:14 am to bbvdd
does it need to be emergency vehicle accessible? how did you arrive at 6k lbs?
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 11:15 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:18 am to Jmcc64
quote:
how did you arrive at 6k lbs?
The weight of my tractor, FEL, and rotary cutter
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 am to magicman534
See if you can find a used flat rack shipping “container”
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:20 am to magicman534
I doubt there is a span table for a piling/round post because they aren’t conventionally used for that. I couldn’t even find a span table for a 8x8 timber which is odd. There is a very rough rule of thumb to use 1” of thickness and width for every foot you are spanning, which would be a true 12x12 timber, but that’s not with a 6k rolling load. 8” piles are way light.
Spent my career in construction and Eng, and I have multiple bridges on my land in MS, and also low water crossings which support loaded log trucks (80k lb). Bridges that I drive my tractors over, 1 has 18”x24” beams with 3x12 decking and the other is an 18 wheeler float trailer.
If it was mine, I’d use 18x12 (18” in vertical) minimum with 3x12 decking, all treated at .80 pcf. And make sure the bridge is in a straight section of the creek, or it will wash out. Broken concrete or rip rap on the upstream side of the bridge will help it not wash but it still should be in a straight run of the creek.
Spent my career in construction and Eng, and I have multiple bridges on my land in MS, and also low water crossings which support loaded log trucks (80k lb). Bridges that I drive my tractors over, 1 has 18”x24” beams with 3x12 decking and the other is an 18 wheeler float trailer.
If it was mine, I’d use 18x12 (18” in vertical) minimum with 3x12 decking, all treated at .80 pcf. And make sure the bridge is in a straight section of the creek, or it will wash out. Broken concrete or rip rap on the upstream side of the bridge will help it not wash but it still should be in a straight run of the creek.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:27 am to magicman534
I would say maybe/probably depending on the soil and other parameters (slope of bank, depth of creek/ditch. How would you drive them? If you're going to press them in the ground with an excavator then maybe not as it's hard to get them in straight without disturbing the skin friction.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:29 am to magicman534
Some guys I know bought an old flat bed semi trailer that was in rough shape. Cut the axels off and drug it across the creek they were crossing with a tractor and FEL.


Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:54 am to Clyde Tipton
^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^
It doesn't have to be an 18 wheeler trailer, any flatbed should work, gooseneck down to bumper pull will span 12 ft
It doesn't have to be an 18 wheeler trailer, any flatbed should work, gooseneck down to bumper pull will span 12 ft
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:02 pm to magicman534
There was actually an Auburn masters thesis done for just what you want….they studied how you could build a forestry bridge for skidders using harvested trees. You might be able to google and find it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:09 pm to subMOA
quote:da Vinci invented the self supporting bridge in the 15th century
There was actually an Auburn masters thesis done for just what you want….
OP, get a flat trailer and use that. It should last forever or close to it
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:27 pm to magicman534
I bought an old flat bed frame from the DOD. Works great
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:34 pm to diat150
quote:
See if you can find a used flat rack shipping “container”

Posted on 12/22/25 at 3:00 pm to magicman534
Not an engineer but if you are able to drive pilings and put bridge on top you would increase strength tremendously
Posted on 12/22/25 at 3:59 pm to magicman534
We have a few bridges like this in the woods. None are only 2.
Dig in 24inches. Sill plates on each end. Three 8x8s laying on gravel parralel to the ditch. Four 8x8s on top running across the span. 3x12 lumber on top. Use bolts or large spikes to attach these cross boards... Which will also greatly increase the beam load capacity.
It will support 6k easy.
I would add significant blocking between the beams just to avoid any racking.
Edit: not an engineer. I had a german grandfather with a penchant for tasking his young and teen grandsons with constructing projects like these. In his words, an engineer is for when you care about material cost. We built a wooden bridge that was able to support a john deere 550 dozer routinely.
I believe the oldest of us was 16 at the time.
Dig in 24inches. Sill plates on each end. Three 8x8s laying on gravel parralel to the ditch. Four 8x8s on top running across the span. 3x12 lumber on top. Use bolts or large spikes to attach these cross boards... Which will also greatly increase the beam load capacity.
It will support 6k easy.
I would add significant blocking between the beams just to avoid any racking.
Edit: not an engineer. I had a german grandfather with a penchant for tasking his young and teen grandsons with constructing projects like these. In his words, an engineer is for when you care about material cost. We built a wooden bridge that was able to support a john deere 550 dozer routinely.
I believe the oldest of us was 16 at the time.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:53 pm to magicman534
Timber pilings?
What kind of decking on top?
What kind of decking on top?
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:30 pm to magicman534
Using an old trailer or container is going to save you time, money, and doing it twice. If you insist on building it, the foundation on each end will be what makes or breaks the project over time. If it moves or twists at the ends, it won't matter what size timber you use. You avoid this problem with the old trailer because its already engineered to support the weight in its own design.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:06 pm to subMOA
quote:you fill the depression with cull logs, include at least one holler log aka “culvert”.
Auburn masters thesis done for just what you want….they studied how you could build a forestry bridge for skidders using harvested trees.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:07 pm
Popular
Back to top
11








