- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:27 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:27 am
you cannot make a single logical argument why we would lie about that.
The entire word was watching the Space Race 24/7, and at the height of the propaganda driven Cold War, the Russians never said the United States is lying.
Not to mention, not a single person that had to be on it has ever come forward to say it was faked...
ETA: thanks for all the pathetically embarrassing responses you fools are making. I needed a good laugh.
The entire word was watching the Space Race 24/7, and at the height of the propaganda driven Cold War, the Russians never said the United States is lying.
Not to mention, not a single person that had to be on it has ever come forward to say it was faked...
ETA: thanks for all the pathetically embarrassing responses you fools are making. I needed a good laugh.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 1:14 am
60
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:32 am to TigerGman
That doesn’t prove anything.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:36 am to TigerGman
Totally wrong.
And…..we can’t get a human being to the moon now. You think they could do it in the late 60’s though???
Radiation would’ve fried the living daylights out of those guys.
So, I will just leave you w one question. Have you watched the press conference after the astronauts returned from the Moon? Those people are plainly lying their asses off.
And…..we can’t get a human being to the moon now. You think they could do it in the late 60’s though???
Radiation would’ve fried the living daylights out of those guys.
So, I will just leave you w one question. Have you watched the press conference after the astronauts returned from the Moon? Those people are plainly lying their asses off.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:48 am to TigerGman
quote:
you cannot make a single logical argument why we would lie about that.
Um.. sure an argument could be made, logical at that.
quote:
The entire word was watching the Space Race 24/7
Watching.... what?
quote:
and at the height of the propaganda driven Cold War, the Russians never said the United States is lying.
Does it amaze you that despite our terrestrial differences, we get along in space?
I don't know or care one way or the other- but don't act like there isn't room for some skepticism.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:59 am to TigerGman
Let me give you some factual data to compare with your “astronaut TV” from the 1960’s.
In order to reach the surface of the Moon from the surface of the Earth, the Apollo astronauts would have had to travel a minimum of 234,000 miles.
Since the last Apollo flight allegedly returned from the Moon in 1972, the furthest that any astronaut from any country has traveled from the surface of the Earth is about 400 miles. And very few have even gone that far. The primary components of the current U.S. space program – the space shuttles, the space station, and the Hubble Telescope – operate at an orbiting altitude of about 200 miles.
But in the 1960’s - we just shot right up there (six times in a row) without a hiccup?
In order to reach the surface of the Moon from the surface of the Earth, the Apollo astronauts would have had to travel a minimum of 234,000 miles.
Since the last Apollo flight allegedly returned from the Moon in 1972, the furthest that any astronaut from any country has traveled from the surface of the Earth is about 400 miles. And very few have even gone that far. The primary components of the current U.S. space program – the space shuttles, the space station, and the Hubble Telescope – operate at an orbiting altitude of about 200 miles.
But in the 1960’s - we just shot right up there (six times in a row) without a hiccup?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:03 am to SallysHuman
There is a lot to be skeptical of. The radiation issues, the lost technology, some of the strange things said by former astronauts. I believe we went, but they are not doing themselves any favors by being aloof as they are with details as well as why would they scrap all the original plans/blueprints as well as all the research that went into it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:04 am to TigerGman
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:05 am to SallysHuman
quote:
The entire word was watching the Space Race 24/7
Watching.... what?
Stop embarrassing yourself.
You don't even know what the Space Race was --
Where's your logical argument you claim can be made? DO tell!
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 1:12 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:07 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
But in the 1960’s - we just shot right up there (six times in a row) without a hiccup?
Without a hiccup? LOL!
Idiot. You just showed how little you know --
And your logical argument is, it was hard? lol
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:08 am to TigerGman
I mean there are literal satellite images of footprints and the flags.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:11 am to czechtiger
quote:
we can’t get a human being to the moon now. You think they could do it in the late 60’s though???
Radiation would’ve fried the living daylights out of those guys.
So we haven't been back to the Moon means We can't? Got a Link?
Got a link to your crack pot Radiation frying cluelessness?
Elon Musk isn't worried about "radiation".
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 1:17 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:16 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
That doesn’t prove anything.
So where's your reasoning why that would not have happened?
And where's YOUR argument why we didn't make it?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:18 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
without a hiccup?
You do realize the Apollo missions were based on all the other missions before that right? From the Explorer, Mercury, Gemini to the Apollo missions, pretty sure they had quite a few hiccups.
Did you not see Apollo 13 …..
Houston, we have a problem…. Remember that?
But I guess that was faked as well…
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 1:24 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:24 am to Hangover Haven
You know, I always think people who don't believe we've gone to the moon ar just being tongue in cheek assholes, then I see discussions like this.
Yes, you can lose the machine tooling/manufacturing ability to return to massive unique case built engineering projects. Yes, it can be easily re-established, but at such a prohibitive cost that no one cares to undertake it and try to justify it for a handful of uses again. You can't exactly repurpose it, to make a commercial product after the science/military application phase is complete.
Yes, you can lose the machine tooling/manufacturing ability to return to massive unique case built engineering projects. Yes, it can be easily re-established, but at such a prohibitive cost that no one cares to undertake it and try to justify it for a handful of uses again. You can't exactly repurpose it, to make a commercial product after the science/military application phase is complete.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:17 am to TigerGman
The simplest and most logical explanation is most often right: It simply didn’t happen.
Piece it together:
Apollo 13: Nine trips, no problem.
All technology destroyed: Why?
56 YEARS later: Not a single person, business, government, country has figured anything out.
The greatest technological advancements in history have happened after a pocket calculator got 9 missions to the moon with 6 landing on the surface and back, no prob.
All signs point to > Never happened to begin with.
Piece it together:
Apollo 13: Nine trips, no problem.
All technology destroyed: Why?
56 YEARS later: Not a single person, business, government, country has figured anything out.
The greatest technological advancements in history have happened after a pocket calculator got 9 missions to the moon with 6 landing on the surface and back, no prob.
All signs point to > Never happened to begin with.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:19 am to TigerGman
quote:
you cannot make a single logical argument why we would lie about that.
The logical argument is that our govt has been lying to us since the beginning of time.
But hell let’s say 58 yrs ago we did land on the moon. Ok, now what? What significance does it make to the avg American in 2025?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:21 am to TigerGman
I can’t believe that we breathe the same air as these moon deniers.
I can’t think of anything else that is more moronic than this bullshite that we didn’t go to the moon.
It’s the same idiots who swallow the communist, propaganda, hook line, and sinker.
I can’t think of anything else that is more moronic than this bullshite that we didn’t go to the moon.
It’s the same idiots who swallow the communist, propaganda, hook line, and sinker.
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News