Started By
Message

It's clear Charlie Kirk was the bulwark against the GOP going full out of touch neocon

Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:49 am
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
25890 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:49 am
Mark Levin, Randy Fine, Ben Shapiro and the rest of the never ending foreign conflicts overseas neocon crowd would not be making their power play right now and attempting to hijack MAGA and the GOP to turn it back into Bush-Romney style neoconservatism if Charlie were still alive

Trump has gone full blown boomer neocon. Without Charlie Kirk in hs ear he is making self inflicted error after self inflicted error. Importing 600k Chinese, 50 year mortgages, 15 year car loans, Biden level gaslighting about how the economy is actually great and if you disagree you just need to suck it up and pull yourself up by the bootstraps, continuing the war in Ukraine, attempting regime change in Venezuela, continuing the H1B pipeline, and endorsing the likes of Lindsey Graham

Charlie was the dam against all this neocon nonsense and his death caused the dam to break and now its a full blown neocon flood.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92279 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:51 am to
Your melts are intensifying

You should start your youtube channel again to get it all out to the masses
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
1873 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:53 am to
Retarded post is retarded.
Posted by ArHog
Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2008
38023 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:56 am to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119241 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:01 am to
We’re owning the libs with 50 year mortgages and 15 year car notes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463637 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:04 am to
quote:

We’re owning the libs with 50 year mortgages and 15 year car notes

Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92279 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:07 am to
You still havent provided a coherent answer on why a 50yr mortgage is any worse than a 30yr

I know you really think you nailed it but you didnt

And i bet the 15yr car loan is all BS
Posted by IMSA_Fan
Member since Jul 2024
542 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:11 am to
50Y mortgages and 15Y car loans are terrible ideas because they massively inflate total interest costs while slowing equity or value buildup to a crawl. A 50Y mortgage keeps borrowers paying mostly interest for decades, locking them into debt well into retirement and artificially driving up home prices. Similarly, a 15Y car loan traps people in negative equity on a rapidly depreciating asset, forcing them to pay interest and maintenance long after the car’s value has collapsed. Both products create an illusion of affordability, but in reality they erode wealth, inflate asset bubbles, and weaken overall financial stability.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 6:12 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463637 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:13 am to
It's all been explained to him. He's just going to ignore principles and the overall point and say "people will refinance" and "housing prices always go up" and ignore all of the inflationary impacts (because he's treating it like a four square at a car dealership tricking a poor into a car they can't afford) and risks involved and how that raises the potential of being an overall -EV move.

He wants people making bad overall financial decisions based on monthly budgets and the same philosophy the naysayers had about RE in 2006.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92279 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:17 am to
quote:

50Y mortgages


You cannot provide a coherent response why its bad especially when you love a 30yr. No one sits in a home loan longer than 7yrs

quote:

15Y car loans are terrible 


Just because some twitter handled tweeted this doesnt make it true. But inagree with this regardless

Doesnt change the fact that you are low iq. Now we have SFP chiming in and all he can say is Gov policy inflates RE.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
134885 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:19 am to
quote:

Without Charlie Kirk in hs ear he is making self inflicted error after self inflicted error....15 year car loans
I thought boomers were supposedly the ones gullible to internet hoaxes.

Are you a boomer?



Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92279 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:20 am to
i knew that was BS

Unusal whales post it so it must be true
Posted by DaTruth7
Member since Apr 2020
4038 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:24 am to
His American first strategy is tariff handouts to the poor haha. We are in trouble
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170130 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:29 am to
quote:


You cannot provide a coherent response why its bad especially when you love a 30yr. No one sits in a home loan longer than 7yrs


Compare the amount of equity you would put into a house for 7 years in a 50 year vs a 30 year and you have your answer
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
8672 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:30 am to
quote:

shut up Lindsey Graham is absolutely America First


OK
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5332 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:31 am to
quote:

Without Charlie Kirk in hs ear


If you think for one minute Trump was taking advice from Kirk your foolish
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92279 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:34 am to
On a 500k house at 3% appreciation in 7yrs they would have 105k in equity on a 50yr loan

On a 500k house at 3% apprecation in 7yrs they would have 105k in equity

You paying principle had nothing to do with that.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
16856 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:38 am to
“ You still haven't provided a coherent answer on why a 50yr mortgage is any worse than a 30yr”

This is about the worse idea of creating a value for ownership. You will be paying 2x or more interest than the cost of goods.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
3872 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:43 am to
quote:

You still havent provided a coherent answer on why a 50yr mortgage is any worse than a 30yr


this should be posterized as an example of why you should be summarily ignored
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
111817 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

You still havent provided a coherent answer on why a 50yr mortgage is any worse than a 30yr


Depends on who you ask.

Fabulous for lender because it would more than double the interest paid in the loan. Plus, you can bet the buyers that opt for this will be paying PMI for a while.

Purchaser gets a lower note (arguably can afford house/more house), but there wouldn't be any measurable equity for decades - which could impair refinancing to get out of that 50 to a 15/20/30 down the line.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 1:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram