- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:44 am
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:44 am
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:46 am to RelicBatches86
Because we refuse to regulate any of it
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:49 am to Powerman
quote:
Because we refuse to regulate any of it
If we had a Monopoly on the technology then our regulation of it could be effective.
But since we don't there will be multiples of AI in other countries that will escape regulation.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:51 am to RelicBatches86
This era of AI scare tactics seems to be more of a boogeyman to cede to authoritarianism in government more than an actual threat to humans.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:52 am to RelicBatches86
Ah yes the “AI could become way too powerful” huckstering from an AI huckster.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:52 am to Decatur
To be fair to Elon, he's always had issues with AI and was a late adapter due to market forces. He's just doing it better than almost anyone else because he and his team are l337
Posted on 11/10/25 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This era of AI scare tactics seems to be more of a boogeyman to cede to authoritarianism in government more than an actual threat to humans.
I think you are being remarkably naive.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This era of AI scare tactics seems to be more of a boogeyman to cede to authoritarianism in government more than an actual threat to humans.
I still stand by my prediction that I will die of old age before what we currently call "AI" makes the leap to a true AGI. Broadly speaking, people have a grossly overestimated view of what current AI is and the kind of technological leaps that are required before it becomes actual intelligence.
I'm 41.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:21 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I still stand by my prediction that I will die of old age before what we currently call "AI" makes the leap to a true AGI. Broadly speaking, people have a grossly overestimated view of what current AI is and the kind of technological leaps that are required before it becomes actual intelligence.
I'm 41.
I'm on Grok quite a bit. I'm not familiar with X AI's standing in the world of development, but Grok is relatively unintelligent. It's not even close to being ready to lead the world. I suppose if it were built to do one task, it would be remarkable, but right now, it's terrible at being the Jack of all Trades.
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 8:23 am
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:22 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I still stand by my prediction that I will die of old age before what we currently call "AI" makes the leap to a true AGI. Broadly speaking, people have a grossly overestimated view of what current AI is and the kind of technological leaps that are required before it becomes actual intelligence.
This.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:26 am to RelicBatches86
No shite. What’s the timeline 10 years? I’ll move to some remote island in the pacific
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:29 am to RelicBatches86
"Self driving cars will be everywhere in 5 years!" - 10 years ago, 5 years ago, now.
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 8:30 am
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This era of AI scare tactics seems to be more of a boogeyman to cede to authoritarianism in government more than an actual threat to humans.
Completely agree
AI is just a tool that takes input from some human, so it all depends upon the source entity not the method
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:33 am to RelicBatches86
We heard these same "scares" when computers came into being. Adapt, adjust.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:34 am to RelicBatches86
And humans will invite it along....
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:36 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
people have a grossly overestimated view of what current AI is and the kind of technological leaps that are required before it becomes actual intelligence
I don't pretend know the timeline, but this will progress faster and faster.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:39 am to RelicBatches86
GOD is in charge. But go ahead and believe in an intelligence called Artificial.

Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:40 am to RelicBatches86
One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise. It’s even more reason why the liberal mindset is so dangerous
Posted on 11/10/25 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
AI as an existential threat is very very real.
It's more real than any Nuclear threat during the height of the cold war.
That doesn't mean it's a foregone conclusion, and it hinges on a lot of assumptions about the nature of consciousness.
Our best guess is that sentience and will arise out of systems that are complex enough - the human brain has ~86 billion neurons and the next most complex brain on Earth is a chimp with ~28 billion neurons. If that's true, we simply need to keep on the current path we are on and AI will become super intelligent. After that we are merely observers of the future AI will craft.
It's more real than any Nuclear threat during the height of the cold war.
That doesn't mean it's a foregone conclusion, and it hinges on a lot of assumptions about the nature of consciousness.
Our best guess is that sentience and will arise out of systems that are complex enough - the human brain has ~86 billion neurons and the next most complex brain on Earth is a chimp with ~28 billion neurons. If that's true, we simply need to keep on the current path we are on and AI will become super intelligent. After that we are merely observers of the future AI will craft.
Popular
Back to top

17













