- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Scott Woodward didn't notify the board of supervisors about Kelly's firing...
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:06 pm to lsufan0582
And there’s your cause….
Ironically no buyout for Scott
Ironically no buyout for Scott
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:07 pm to lsufan0582
That makes no sense based on whats been reported.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:08 pm to josh336
Idk what to believe anymore honestly.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:08 pm to lsufan0582
quote:
as Scott Woodward fired Brian Kelly without notifying the LSU Board of Supervisors.
They didn’t say thank you? He had the full buyout funded by a billionaire
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:08 pm to lsufan0582
Other than 2 hires (one in which LSU baseball sells itself), this guy seems to make terrible decision after terrible decision. He is flat out horrible with money and that's what cost him in the end. And rightfully so
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:09 pm to Adam Banks
NIce- scott gets the Will WADE treatment- could not happen to a better Democrat- i mean person
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:09 pm to lsufan0582
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:10 pm to lsufan0582
They could make a movie out of the cluster frick over the past week.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:13 pm to lsufan0582
Our good ole BR boys here will tell you SW should be here forever.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:15 pm to lsufan0582
Well that was just arrogant and dumb.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:15 pm to lsufan0582
If this was true Landry would have been shouting it from the rooftops.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:15 pm to lsufan0582
The real question is, if Scott lined up the buyout money and now Scott is gone, do those donors back out?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:15 pm to lsufan0582
Is this what caused all the confusion? Lil Scotty got him some balls.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:19 pm to mikesliveisacheater
No, if anything donors weren't happy with Scott
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:23 pm to lsufan0582
Scott didn’t go with the intention to fire Kelly on Sunday.
And do you all realize how toxic and inept Woodward thought Kelly was that he would fire him, knowing it would likely cost him his own job? The guy isn’t stupid.
And do you all realize how toxic and inept Woodward thought Kelly was that he would fire him, knowing it would likely cost him his own job? The guy isn’t stupid.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:23 pm to lsufan0582
quote:
No, if anything donors weren't happy with Scott
It’s amazing how clueless yall are. Scott Woodward is extremely close on a personal level with Todd graves, the biggest swinging dick we have
They are childhood friends level of close
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:24 pm to JimTiger72
quote:But had SW gotten committment from said billionaire to fund the buyout ahead of time? Or did said billionaire step up after BK had gotten his pink slip and some panic set in around the athletic department on how to pay BK’s buyout and still have money for a new coach?
He had the full buyout funded by a billionaire
We need a 30 for 30 on this week
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:28 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s amazing how clueless yall are. Scott Woodward is extremely close on a personal level with Todd graves, the biggest swinging dick we have
They are childhood friends
Yeah, I'm sure those donors are ecstatic about having to pay a record setting $53 MILLION buyout after having to pay a $17 MILLION buyout just a few years ago.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:29 pm to Contra
quote:Who do you think agrees to these contracts? The people that will be funding them is who
Yeah, I'm sure those donors are ecstatic about having to pay a record setting $53 MILLION buyout after having to pay a $17 MILLION buyout just a few years ago.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:29 pm
Popular
Back to top


13










