Started By
Message

Hypothetical: if the Saints have the #1 Overall Pick

Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:16 pm
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33331 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:16 pm
Let’s say Shough starts the rest of the year and doesn’t do much better than Rattler. Let’s say he wins 2 games to Rattler’s 1. I know myself and others have been adamant about trading our top 5 pick (which we seem locked for at the moment) down into the 7-8 range to accumulate more picks. The roster needs talent. The state of the roster is abysmal, though there are some bright spots.

But if you get the number 1 overall pick, you have to consider Mendoza, right? Moore has shown flashes for sure but Mendoza seems to have the edge and will probably win the Heisman. I still don’t think taking a QB with the state of the roster would be smart, but you’d still have to consider it, right?
Posted by Champs
Geaux Tigers
Member since Feb 2008
12385 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:17 pm to
If you picking 1, you obviously need qb…that’s the pick
Posted by Seeker
Member since Jul 2011
2058 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

If you picking 1, you obviously need qb…that’s the pick


I think the more successful trend is to get good pieces around a FA vet QB.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35383 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:26 pm to
This isn’t considered a strong draft. Nobody is going to want to trade up and give us extra picks to jump up to draft…who?

We need more than a QB. The QBs in this draft like Mendoza, Simpson, Mateer, etc. are likely low ceiling QBs that aren’t much better than what we have. They will fail the same way our current ones will. Sellers is the high risk/high reward QB, but you need to have patience with him and make big roster moves to make him successful.

IMO, if you have 1.1 you take the best WR (Tyson, Tate, Brazell) or best pass rusher (Bain, Faulk, Woods). If you have the 4th or 5th pick, feel free to take Downs or a CB. We need all of it.
Posted by Neilfish
Member since Jun 2006
3371 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:27 pm to
I agree, but I do not trust Mickey and his group of talent evaluators to make good draft selections.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33331 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:27 pm to
I was in favor of that strategy but with how bad Rattler has been, and how bad Shough COULD be the rest of the season, I don’t know. I feel like you still need talent on the roster and there’s no guarantee - if you pass on QB this time - that there will be a good one the following year.

If you traded the 1 pick for more picks instead of taking Mendoza, you’re essentially punting another season in hopes Arch, Sellers, Lagway or someone else develops out of the blue. And right now, it seems like all three of those guys don’t just need 1 more year but perhaps 2-3. It could all be a moot point because I think the Jets finish with the 1 but it could lead to some hard decisions if the Saints end up with the top pick
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33331 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

The QBs in this draft like Mendoza, Simpson, Mateer, etc. are likely low ceiling QBs that aren’t much better than what we have


I mean if you’ve done any amount of research and listened to any scouting podcasts you’d know that simply isn’t true, at least regarding Mendoza and Moore.
Posted by PlacerCoTiger
Placer County, CA
Member since Nov 2015
393 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:30 pm to
I think it’s more about how Shough looks and commands the offense than numbers or wins per se. if he looks comparable to Rattler, that might be good enough. Rattler has a full year more of pro experience than Shough. Have to assess Shough’s projected development in year 2.

While I like the idea of trading down, you have to find somebody who’s willing to trade up and give up what you’re looking for. That might not be easy.

I’d rather draft best available. If that’s a QB and you think you need one, great. If not, don’t force it.


This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 12:33 pm
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile, AL.
Member since May 2008
35332 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:44 pm to
It will be interesting to see if the Saints go out and sign a veteran free agent quarterback this off-season.

You know at least a quarterback that can come in and compete. Not necessarily someone that you're just going to name the starter the day you sign him

I would think after they did not do that this past off-season that they would not do it two years in a row
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13553 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

I think the more successful trend is to get good pieces around a FA vet QB.


I’ve pointed this out several times on this board.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73651 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:57 pm to
This will be said a lot between now and the draft and its simple.
If the HC and the FO believe there is a franchise QB available with the pic you don't hesitate.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463653 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

If the HC and the FO believe there is a franchise QB available with the pic you don't hesitate.
'
But their decision-making in personnel and with draft picks has shown to be questionable.

I mean in this scenario they literally burned an early 2nd on a QB just last year based on those same evals
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
174764 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:35 pm to
In order:

You draft QB1
Or Entertain Trade down
Bain Jr would be fallback.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
27273 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 2:03 pm to
If Rattler and Shough are both awful to end the season, you grab best QB.

If one of them starts to show some signs of potential to let them try another year, I'm on board to draft a beast DE if one is good enough to take early OR we trade back and accrue draft picks.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
27273 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

I think the more successful trend is to get good pieces around a FA vet QB.
quote:

I’ve pointed this out several times on this board.
I've gotten crucified for saying that I like the idea of drafting anything but QB in upcoming drafts and finding a diamond in the rough FA QB.

You see guys like Baker/D.Jones/Sam Darnold in the last year or 2 be somewhat cheap FA options that can win games on a good roster. There were other guys in the years prior to this also that were FA guys that did well on a new team.

I'm not saying that it's easy to do, but if Kellen Moore doesn't like anyone to draft top 3 this upcoming draft, it's a good option to consider looking at someone that is currently in the NFL.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73651 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 2:12 pm to
No one in or outside the org has called Tyler a “franchise QB”. Poor analogy.
Posted by Dotarian
Midwest
Member since Oct 2012
1682 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 3:37 pm to
We're rebuilding, and that's going to take more than one year. I'd rather trade down for more draft capital, build other areas of the team and hire a veteran QB until the 2027/2028 draft.

After mortgaging the team's soul for the last few years with Brees through Carr, I expected a rebuild to take 2-3 years once we actually started.
Posted by Tigeralltheway
Member since Jan 2014
2744 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 4:00 pm to
If I stay at #1, I'm picking Mendoza. Has the prototypical size to excel with development. Has had success in Cal and IU.

I can't pick Downs, Jordan, or Bain at #1. I love Bain, but he has disappeared too many times for me.

If you look at QBs in the 2027 draft... there are none besides Arch, and he sucks. We need to find a QB and hopefully draft Jeremiah Smith
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5391 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The QBs in this draft like Mendoza, Simpson, Mateer, etc. are likely low ceiling QBs that aren’t much better than what we have. They will fail the same way our current ones will.


This is retarded. The QBs we have weren’t particularly good QBs in college. Rattler is undersized with questionably leadership abilities. Shough was injury prone and inaccurate in college. Neither are capable runners to make up for these issues.

Mendoza is having an incredible college career, has ideal size, and by all accounts checks all leadership and intelligence boxes you could ask for in a QB. He is getting better each year in college. He is absolutely a guy you take 1 overall when you suck.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35383 posts
Posted on 10/27/25 at 4:29 pm to
quote:


If Rattler and Shough are both awful to end the season, you grab best QB.


Can’t wait to watch the next Zach Wilson, Josh Rosen, Blaine Gabbert, etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram