- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This perfectly illustrates the insanity of today's College Coaching Contracts.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:41 am
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:41 am
When Woody Hayes was fired in the late 70's he was making 75K a year and living in this conservative home.
That was after coaching for decades and winning multiple National Championships.
James Franking is getting $50 Million to go away.
UF is paying Billy Napier $21 Million to not coach after compiling a losing record at UF.
Clown World

That was after coaching for decades and winning multiple National Championships.
James Franking is getting $50 Million to go away.
UF is paying Billy Napier $21 Million to not coach after compiling a losing record at UF.
Clown World

Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:43 am to TheOcean
It really has lost a ton of shine.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:47 am to Long and Tall
quote:
late 70's he was making 75K a year
What percentage of the budget was that 75k ? What was the profit on OSU football in the 70s and what is it today ?
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:49 am to Long and Tall
The only positive is that maybe, just maybe, the era of these ridiculous guaranteed contracts and buyouts is coming to an end. They can't possibly be financially sustainable for the employers.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:53 am to Long and Tall
Probably a decent size house back then. And I’m sure you can find some coaches back them that did have lavish houses.
You’re right about the contracts. But I don’t think using this house to prove your point is what you need to do lol
You’re right about the contracts. But I don’t think using this house to prove your point is what you need to do lol
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:53 am to yaherrdme
quote:
What percentage of the budget was that 75k ? What was the profit on OSU football in the 70s and what is it today ?
This is how you justify coaches getting contracts that pay them 10's of Millions when they get fired for sucking ?
For God's sake, F'ing Billy Napier is getting $21 Million to not coach after compiling a losing record.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:53 am to Honest Tune
quote:
It really has lost a ton of shine.
I hate to be one of those "back in my day!" kinda guys, but it's impossible not to feel that way. I'll never give up on it since it's been such a critical and deeply embedded part of me my entire life since birth, but yeah it's just a shell of what it was.
COLLEGE football shoudl be about amateur student athletes competing against other amateur student athletes that are representing their university, more often than not by guys that grew up in that state. Now it's simply professional football. If I wanted to watch the pros I'd be an NFL guy.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:58 am to Long and Tall
quote:
This is how you justify coaches getting contracts that pay them 10's of Millions when they get fired for sucking ?
Uh...yeah. Why wouldn't you?
College football was a much smaller product when the picture in OP was taken.
It really blew up in the mid-00s and salaries tracked the popularity increase.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:01 am to Long and Tall
College football is going to come to an end faster than people think.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:01 am to Long and Tall
quote:
When Woody Hayes was fired in the late 70's he was making 75K a year and living in this conservative home.
That was after coaching for decades and winning multiple National Championships.
His last 5 years tOSU played just 17 out of 60 games on TV and 5 of those were bowls.
Comparing salaries from different eras doesn't really make sense b/c TV and sponsorship money back then was minuscule compared to now.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:01 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
COLLEGE football shoudl be about amateur student athletes competing against other amateur student athletes that are representing their university
While everyone else gets rich of course
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:01 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
I hate to be one of those "back in my day!" kinda guys, but it's impossible not to feel that way.
A large part of the appeal/magic of College Football back in the day was that it was truly regional.
90% of the players for a given team were from that state.
People took pride because it was actually our guys vs your guys.
Now it's more like the NFL.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:02 am to Long and Tall
quote:
by Long and Tall
Great thread TX Tiger and 70 other associated usernames
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:04 am to Long and Tall
Back in those days one of the top incentives was that your family members got patronage jobs like being put on the board of regents at a local bank or some no show Vice President position at Golden Flake. Now their kids don't even have to bother with that. They can just piss off somewhere and live the life of a regular trust fund baby.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:04 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
I hate to be one of those "back in my day!" kinda guys, but it's impossible not to feel that way. I'll never give up on it since it's been such a critical and deeply embedded part of me my entire life since birth, but yeah it's just a shell of what it was.
COLLEGE football shoudl be about amateur student athletes competing against other amateur student athletes that are representing their university, more often than not by guys that grew up in that state. Now it's simply professional football. If I wanted to watch the pros I'd be an NFL guy
YOU, the consumer, made it what it is today by your love for the product.
YOU, were willing to pay ever increasing ticket prices to attend the games.
YOU, loved to watch the games on TV.
The current status of college football is simply the "product" meeting the market demand. YOU, the consumer, don't really care much about men's college soccer..,.which is why it's more akin to what you think football "should" be about.
The only reason Woody Hayes wasn't making huge money was because college football, as whole, wasn't a hugely profitable entertainment business then. If it were, Hayes would have been a very wealthy man.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:04 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Great thread TX Tiger and 70 other associated usernames
Weird obsession with posters and their other usernames
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:07 am to Long and Tall
This is all driven by TV money. In 1990, the top programs in the country were bringing in around $1 million a year from TV contracts. Now, depending on the conference, that number is as much as $100 million a year.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:08 am to TackySweater
quote:
Weird obsession with posters and their other usernames
Ok
Posted on 10/21/25 at 11:19 am to WG_Dawg
Bingo. I detached emotionally from pro football long ago. LSU has been a passion project for me since the late 80s (earliest recollection of throwing an LSU football in the yard at T-giving with an uncle). Like most here, college football was very personal. The changes in the game the past 30 years, basically since recruiting services started really putting the shine on individual achievements on a national level, has made it way too commercial for me to care personally. When LSU lost to Vandy Saturday I simply turned off the tv and went to weed eat. By that evening I had all but forgotten we played.
Popular
Back to top

28







